|
On July 06 2015 07:20 Clarity_nl wrote: Hype! And already information.
Holyflare claiming VT is interesting. Doesn't seem something scum would do or think of this quickly after PMs went out/daypost went up.
Not lynching him today. strange entry post, why would you believe a first-post-of-the-day-VT-claim?
|
On July 06 2015 20:19 KelsierSC wrote:Show nested quote +On July 06 2015 20:16 boxerfred wrote:On July 06 2015 07:20 Clarity_nl wrote: Hype! And already information.
Holyflare claiming VT is interesting. Doesn't seem something scum would do or think of this quickly after PMs went out/daypost went up.
Not lynching him today. strange entry post, why would you believe a first-post-of-the-day-VT-claim? i'm confused why you are asking about the first post clarity made now when you have already commented on this point which came afterwards Show nested quote +On July 06 2015 16:54 boxerfred wrote:On July 06 2015 08:28 Clarity_nl wrote:On July 06 2015 08:26 KelsierSC wrote:On July 06 2015 08:24 Clarity_nl wrote:On July 06 2015 08:23 rsoultin wrote:On July 06 2015 08:21 Clarity_nl wrote:On July 06 2015 08:19 KelsierSC wrote:On July 06 2015 08:17 Clarity_nl wrote:On July 06 2015 08:16 KelsierSC wrote: [quote]
do you have anymore town? Don't really see the point in giving a ton of townreads, but no, no strong reads. ok, it just confuses me because you gave a townread on hf after 1 post, then you haven't established reads on other people. I suppose if you haven't played with hf then maybe you can meta out a reason but it feels inconsistent. what is the answer to your hf and I (grammar) can't be scum? I said we can't both be scum Seems like a really weird thing for two scum to do early on, no? I just realized it after I made my first post and figured it's a good way to start talking about something useful. -squints at- lol you do realize how little sense this actually makes, right? You're replying a lot to me rsoultin but saying very little. I think it makes sense. If HF and me are both scum, I feel we would basically never have that interaction a few minutes into day 1. Do you disagree? what do you mean by interaction though you called hf town and then you reference how because of this "interaction" you cant both be scum OK I want to move past this as it's not really worth spending a lot of time on. If me and HF both roll scum, and HF enters the game going "Lol I thought I rolled cop but it's just the VT flavor" do you think I, as scum, would call my scum partner "totes town not lynching today"? What do you think of rsoultin? Specifically the way she's replied to me. overly defensive shit plus attentionshift on rsoulting not liking that that came to my mind when someone said he's needlessly sheeping people, on the last page. i remembered his entry post, reread it and decided to not like it.
##vote clarity_nl
|
On July 06 2015 19:46 Oatsmaster wrote: What a needless sheep post clarity. None of those are serious questions lol.
here this one
|
to this one:
On July 06 2015 19:43 Clarity_nl wrote:Show nested quote +On July 06 2015 19:14 Oatsmaster wrote: Out of everything that has happened in the thread so far clarity, you mention marv?? Do you have any reads at all?
Read the thread please? I came back, commented on trfl and then marv showed up so I said hi. Show nested quote +On July 06 2015 19:40 boxerfred wrote: I dont like first day claims at all. just creating more confusion and more "maybes". how serious were the cop claims btw? pure lel? I think self-aware wandered claim is fine. The cop claims were obviously just people being silly,
|
On July 06 2015 20:24 marvellosity wrote: I'm not ganging up on him. why not
|
well kelsier it was like this:
I read up to page 20 I skimmed through the rest till 40 I did not like the sheep that was pointed out I remembered the first post (which I did not read too deep into before), read it and was not liking that he instabelieved the VT claim.
the overly defensive + attentionshift post was not taken into consideration for my vote. thanks for reminding me, makes me dislike him even more.
|
|
also Palmar did not vote on Clarity yet. Why?
|
On July 06 2015 20:50 Clarity_nl wrote:Show nested quote +On July 06 2015 20:48 boxerfred wrote: well kelsier it was like this:
I read up to page 20 I skimmed through the rest till 40 I did not like the sheep that was pointed out I remembered the first post (which I did not read too deep into before), read it and was not liking that he instabelieved the VT claim.
the overly defensive + attentionshift post was not taken into consideration for my vote. thanks for reminding me, makes me dislike him even more. My first post was basically the entire discussion for the first 5 pages or whatever, how can you only just now have formed an opinion on it? that's a lie, page 16-21 are not all about your entry post. they are about a bit of "lel that claim", lots of shittalking and other stuff. nothing on you sheeping the VT claim.
|
You have been following the VT claim blindly, which is sheeping.
|
On July 06 2015 20:55 Clarity_nl wrote:Show nested quote +On July 06 2015 20:54 boxerfred wrote: You have been following the VT claim blindly, which is sheeping. So I'm sheeping myself? Nice. Luckily it's a big game and me saying I'm not lynching holyflare (which hasn't changed) isn't really gonna affect day 1. What?
On July 06 2015 07:19 Holyflare wrote: "sweet i got investigator!" *checks op* *oh.... " => VT Claim by Holyflare. That's at least how I take it.
On July 06 2015 07:20 Clarity_nl wrote: Hype! And already information.
Holyflare claiming VT is interesting. Doesn't seem something scum would do or think of this quickly after PMs went out/daypost went up.
Not lynching him today. You sheeping his claim. You're not sheeping yourself. Thefuck are you talking about?
On July 06 2015 20:54 marvellosity wrote:Show nested quote +On July 06 2015 20:53 Oatsmaster wrote: Im not gonna bother voting in the voting thread, just assume my vote is on clarity.
Even boxer who isnt even you knows what im talking about clarity. I and everyone else will assume your vote is NOT on Clarity until you put it on Clarity.
+ Show Spoiler +
|
On July 06 2015 21:00 marvellosity wrote: that's not "sheeping" his claim, that makes no sense. that's "believing". okay, I'll refrain from the term then. Excuse my misuse please.
|
45 pages of close to nothing
|
|
In Not themed, kelsier was town and that was clear for anyone since day One. Are his other games similar in that regard? The xP stuff has been and is pure bullshit imo
|
On July 06 2015 23:05 boxerfred wrote: In Not themed, kelsier was town and that was clear for anyone since day One. Are his other games similar in that regard? The xP stuff has been and is pure bullshit imo Sorry, i meant himalaya not Not themed. Point still stands, anyone able to give a meta read into ksc?
|
Marv is really Holding himself back, dropping lines but not really entering conversations. I dunno about pages 20 to 40 since i only skimmed.
Is that normal or at least okayish for him?
|
Yep sorry, just contributing from mobile in the Bus, throwing out ideas. Yeah and im no cop.
|
HtS, you dropped quite a lot of opinions. Who's your top scum read?
|
I don't like the Miller claim that HtS spewed out, like he doesn't give a fuck. Reads more like a backup (which is sadly NAI), claiming Miller makes sense as scum and as town. He's threwing out cases and opinions without going too hard for someone. He did the same in the Himalaya game after he got in via replacement, he was scum in there.
I just want to say that before people start sheeping him.
|
|
|
|