EPTI personally like a sicklucker lynch. He's basically claimed third party.
Is this a townie thing to say?
Aperture Mafia 4: This Time it's Personal - Page 79
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Chezitwo
United States553 Posts
Is this a townie thing to say? | ||
|
Onegu
United States9695 Posts
Nope kill scum | ||
|
rsoultin
Netherlands15308 Posts
On March 30 2015 00:50 LightningStrike wrote: Also I more incline to say HTS is town based the fact her play does seem very similar to her play from NYE Party more so than Void when she was Mafia. yeeeah bro, think it's entirely too early and she's been entirely too inactive (something she already said pre-game would be the case day 1) to make any sort of meta reads on her | ||
|
ObiWanShinobi
United States8089 Posts
I don't see why it shouldn't be. | ||
|
Chezitwo
United States553 Posts
On March 29 2015 22:46 Damdred wrote: Quoting on phone is bad for me rs so I'll just thought dump on him. I don't like snarls specifically because of the way he approaches kita and hap in general. He pushes against any hapa sentiment and chainsaw defends to me in a few points, and his opening vote was interesting but he gave little to no reasoning or showed what towny things chez was doing. I think he's probable Scum On March 29 2015 10:03 Snarfs wrote: i'm voting chez because I think as a warrior whoever he would pick to lynch would be well explained in thread. From his posting I feel like he'd pick someone intelligently and with input from town, he doesn't seem quick to pull the trigger which is exactly what I outlined in our ideal warrior. On March 29 2015 10:49 Snarfs wrote: Why do you actually think he's scummy? I don't get the bank thing and don't realllllly care at this point. I trust him because he's pointing out things that seem to be helping town find scum rather than mislynches which seems opposite of what scum would be doing. That's the 2nd bad or lazy read Damdred made. You can agree or disagree with the reasoning Snarfs made making me town, but he very clearly gave it and more than once. And his filter isn't really long enough to miss these things. | ||
|
rsoultin
Netherlands15308 Posts
i know who said it and where you pulled it from, so i'm already tainted  but yes i've already pointed this out as interesting...not sure it's alignment-indicative though, chez | ||
|
LightningStrike
United States14276 Posts
 | ||
|
Chezitwo
United States553 Posts
On March 30 2015 01:38 rsoultin wrote: i know who said it and where you pulled it from, so i'm already tainted but yes i've already pointed this out as interesting...not sure it's alignment-indicative though, chez The other thing that I thought was potentially interesting is that in one post he said he had no read on HF, and the next post he was voting HF as supertownie man. HF had posted a lot in between, so maybe it was warranted after all. But there is this line: His lynch candidates also generally line up with mine. I'm not sure how true this is, HF hasn't seemed predisposed to lynch sl, HF finds ExO townie, and Trfel said next to nothing about Hapa. | ||
|
Chezitwo
United States553 Posts
On March 30 2015 01:41 LightningStrike wrote: Chez is Artanis Tina Bitch please. | ||
|
LightningStrike
United States14276 Posts
She loved you in Linux lol........ | ||
|
Damdred
15669 Posts
On March 30 2015 01:37 Chezitwo wrote: That's the 2nd bad or lazy read Damdred made. You can agree or disagree with the reasoning Snarfs made making me town, but he very clearly gave it and more than once. And his filter isn't really long enough to miss these things. No that doesn't disprove what I'm saying at all. Look at what is aid and look at what he said. He isn't it showing what you are doing he's making general statements without anything to back them up in his posts. So no it's not a lazy read. Also show me what are these things he's talking about if he's explaining himself well | ||
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
On March 29 2015 20:09 Holyflare wrote: probably towny Trfel Could you elaborate with this one? | ||
|
Chezitwo
United States553 Posts
On March 30 2015 01:49 Damdred wrote: No that doesn't disprove what I'm saying at all. Look at what is aid and look at what he said. He isn't it showing what you are doing he's making general statements without anything to back them up in his posts. So no it's not a lazy read. Also show me what are these things he's talking about if he's explaining himself well You literally said he gave little to no reasoning, when he was very explicit with why he was voting for me. I don't understand your point about showing what I'm doing, he doesn't have to make quotes to have a valid opinion. But I'm not going to discuss this with you anymore, because I'm not trying to convince you of anything. I'm not even sure it makes you mafia, because your comments on how he treated Hapa are fine. | ||
|
rsoultin
Netherlands15308 Posts
On March 29 2015 21:59 rsoultin wrote: yo, hf, you comfortable with truffle's "you're a good scum player i don't know how to read you" turning into a vote on you xP while saying y'all have the same scumreads but pushing a lynch of a player he believes to be a third party? kinda preaching to the choir on this one chez | ||
|
Chezitwo
United States553 Posts
On March 30 2015 02:03 rsoultin wrote: kinda preaching to the choir on this one chez Have 10 Gold Dragons | ||
|
Damdred
15669 Posts
On March 30 2015 01:57 Chezitwo wrote: You literally said he gave little to no reasoning, when he was very explicit with why he was voting for me. I don't understand your point about showing what I'm doing, he doesn't have to make quotes to have a valid opinion. But I'm not going to discuss this with you anymore, because I'm not trying to convince you of anything. I'm not even sure it makes you mafia, because your comments on how he treated Hapa are fine. No we need to discuss this. Your correct in that you don't have to quote etc. To have an opinion. I disagree that he is well or explicit in your reasoning. I find his explanation to be really generic and blanket with little reasoning. | ||
|
rsoultin
Netherlands15308 Posts
On March 30 2015 02:06 Damdred wrote: No we need to discuss this. Your correct in that you don't have to quote etc. To have an opinion. I disagree that he is well or explicit in your reasoning. I find his explanation to be really generic and blanket with little reasoning. +1 sorry chez like the whole thrust of his read appeared to be you wouldn't go rogue (lolol pun intended) and do whatever the fuck you want...like saying someone is intelligent and not pursuing (what he perceives to be) mislynches is a kinda weak townread, at least from where i'm sitting | ||
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
| ||
|
batsnacks
United States4466 Posts
| ||
|
GreYMisT
United States6736 Posts
yamato77 (1): WaveofShadow Blazinghand (0): Holyflare (4): VayneAuthority (2): VisceraEyes (1): Onegu Onegu (1): VisceraEyes ritoky (2): sicklucker, batsnacks Chezitwo (0): rsoultin (1): ExO_ Koshi (1): rsoultin Not Voting (14): justanothertownie, Keirathi, Damdred, LightningStrike, Alakaslam, Crossfire99, HalftheSky, Chezitwo, Hapahauli, Blazinghand, yamato77, ritoky, kitaman27, ObiWanShinobi Currently Holyflare is set to be elected as the fighter. Currently VayneAuthority is set to be elected as the rogue. Currently ritoky is set to be elected as the cleric. Day 1 ends in on Sunday, Mar 29 11:00pm GMT (GMT+00:00) Reminder: You may not vote for yourself. Voting is Mandatory | ||
| ||
