|
United Kingdom10443 Posts
On January 22 2015 02:29 Half the Sky wrote:Show nested quote +On January 22 2015 01:19 KelsierSC wrote:
now it's because she thought I was talking about damdred as scum...wtf
Kelsier... Show nested quote +On January 21 2015 19:31 KelsierSC wrote:
What this means is that when she is "scum hunting" and someone brings up an event that incriminates her target , which she "doesn't remember" rather than ask me about it or question that it happened. She just agrees with me and says "oh yeh that aswell" To me that is a scum mentallity
Then why did you phrase it that way? I remembered Sicklucker, I was scumreading him. Damdred wasn't my target.
what do you mean why did I phrase it that way.
This was my question to you because I wanted to know if you were for real or just going with the thread mentality.
On January 21 2015 01:25 KelsierSC wrote:Show nested quote +On January 21 2015 01:24 Half the Sky wrote:
Nope. I remembered the thing with Lian because Lian had been calling him out from the beginning. alright. you didn't mention him dodging the question about damd? that felt like a big sidestep
that is obvious i was taalking about SL dodging a question about damdred. you replied
On January 21 2015 01:29 KelsierSC wrote:Show nested quote +On January 21 2015 01:28 Half the Sky wrote:
No, not saying the question on Damd wasn't a sidestep, but the ones on Marv and Lian were the first thing that came to my mind. Also SL was trying to convince me at the beginning on Marv, but I'd taken a wait and see approach. hmm that's weird because I don't remember there being a question on Dam.
so clearly you knew i was talking about SL dodging a question damdred, you agreed with me. But that question never existed.
|
On January 21 2015 08:54 Alakaslam wrote:
Liancourt
One more dodge and I join koshi's.
Time to be mocking scumslam before townslam; you SCUMREAD me for lack of CHUPAZI.
Very well; but blindness is not a crime.
![[image loading]](https://benziher.files.wordpress.com/2013/12/burning-bus.jpg)
|
And now I go play something else. Been a stressful as fuck day for an ill Vivax.
|
On January 22 2015 02:38 Koshi wrote:Show nested quote +On January 22 2015 02:33 Half the Sky wrote:
Also switched my vote to liancourt, based on what I had said earlier. Or show me you will be useful tomorrow. What do you think about my scumpool?
Koshi, will do, will do my best. As for your scumpool, obviously I voted Lian.
Slam is generally someone I try not to read D1, he falls into the same category as VA, do I know if he's hiding behind a meta or not? In Carol, if I recall right people tried to read him D1 and were criticised for it.
Wile, I obviously don't know him, so from what I recall at face value, he has answered questions from HF and he seems to have asked some questions of people. He looked okay to me.
Oats looked okay to me until he threw out Bats' name, and again didn't explain why. Then his thing on Vivax. I questioned him on why he wanted to lynch Bats, but I don't recall a response. If he did, I missed it.
|
Koshi, to add to Slam, again same with VA, if I were to ignore meta, I would be scumreading both for doing absolutely nothing to help town.
|
On January 22 2015 02:44 Half the Sky wrote:Show nested quote +On January 22 2015 02:38 Koshi wrote:On January 22 2015 02:33 Half the Sky wrote:
Also switched my vote to liancourt, based on what I had said earlier. Or show me you will be useful tomorrow. What do you think about my scumpool? Koshi, will do, will do my best. As for your scumpool, obviously I voted Lian. Slam is generally someone I try not to read D1, he falls into the same category as VA, do I know if he's hiding behind a meta or not? In Carol, if I recall right people tried to read him D1 and were criticised for it. Wile, I obviously don't know him, so from what I recall at face value, he has answered questions from HF and he seems to have asked some questions of people. He looked okay to me. Oats looked okay to me until he threw out Bats' name, and again didn't explain why. Then his thing on Vivax. I questioned him on why he wanted to lynch Bats, but I don't recall a response. If he did, I missed it.
Can you answer more dangerously. This is all pretty boring.
|
On January 22 2015 02:46 Half the Sky wrote:
Koshi, to add to Slam, again same with VA, if I were to ignore meta, I would be scumreading both for doing absolutely nothing to help town.
Slam did some things. Nothing you found interesting? He is trying.
|
Slam and VA are clearly not playing the same style of game.
|
On January 22 2015 02:40 KelsierSC wrote:
what do you mean why did I phrase it that way.
Kels, I quoted the last section of your case, but since you responded...
On January 22 2015 02:40 KelsierSC wrote:Show nested quote +On January 21 2015 01:29 KelsierSC wrote:On January 21 2015 01:28 Half the Sky wrote:
No, not saying the question on Damd wasn't a sidestep, but the ones on Marv and Lian were the first thing that came to my mind. Also SL was trying to convince me at the beginning on Marv, but I'd taken a wait and see approach. hmm that's weird because I don't remember there being a question on Dam. so clearly you knew i was talking about SL dodging a question damdred, you agreed with me. But that question never existed.
We went through this. Did I recall? No. Did I assume? Yes. Do you really think I was going to argue or even comment on a point I didn't recall? Again, I recalled the points I was involved with, Marv and Lian.
|
United Kingdom10443 Posts
ok but in what fucking universe is it a good mentality when someone calls out someone on something you don't remember, and rather than question it or argue you just agree with me?
|
On January 22 2015 02:46 Koshi wrote:
Can you answer more dangerously. This is all pretty boring.
Alright, disregarding meta, then.
Lian, I already explained. Scumread.
Slam did press Lian and threatened to vote him if he dodged questions. On this alone, I'd townread him but that's about all he has done.
VA, disregarding meta, I'd scumread since he's not doing anything. Random votes Slam. Is he hiding behind meta? I don't know.
Wile is a null. Answered questions from HF, did do some probing of people in the game, he did ask me some questions. Nothing has stuck out as scumlike.
Oats appeared his usual self until the call for the Bats lynch and the push on Vivax. Those two actions would have me scumread him.
|
On January 22 2015 02:53 KelsierSC wrote:
ok but in what fucking universe is it a good mentality when someone calls out someone on something you don't remember, and rather than question it or argue you just agree with me?
Kels, maybe my understanding of English is different but not arguing a point with you does not mean I'm agreeing with you.
Have you considered that some people may not question something because they feel what they already have in front of them is enough?
|
I am having a really busy day at work today. Will try to catch up as quickly as possible now. Who are we lynching currently?
|
United Kingdom10443 Posts
On January 21 2015 01:29 KelsierSC wrote:Show nested quote +On January 21 2015 01:28 Half the Sky wrote:
No, not saying the question on Damd wasn't a sidestep, but the ones on Marv and Lian were the first thing that came to my mind. Also SL was trying to convince me at the beginning on Marv, but I'd taken a wait and see approach. hmm that's weird because I don't remember there being a question on Dam.
|
Nha, Kels has a good point. You should have looked it up. This was lazy from you.
I would lynch you over it as well on a blue Sunday. Or how does that saying go?
Anyway. It's lazy play. Could be town lazy though. But you got to educate the lazy townies.
On January 21 2015 08:53 liancourt wrote:Show nested quote +On January 21 2015 08:46 Half the Sky wrote:
Also Lian, you threw out a townread on Vivax early on. What do you make of him now, after all he's posted? Trying way too hard too early town
The only post in lian his filter that makes me hesitate lynching him. But tbh. Why not get rid of him? We are going to lynch him somewhere on the way. This liancourt needs more education than HTS. And we educate through lynching.
|
On January 22 2015 03:03 Wile E. Coyote wrote:
I am having a really busy day at work today. Will try to catch up as quickly as possible now. Who are we lynching currently?
Sickluster. Which is a terrible lynch. And I don't know wtf you are doing sitting on him.
|
On January 22 2015 03:05 KelsierSC wrote:
hmm that's weird because I don't remember there being a question on Dam.
[/QUOTE]
Again Kels, it goes to how you phrased your question:
On January 21 2015 01:25 KelsierSC wrote:
you didn't mention him dodging the question about damd? that felt like a big sidestep
|
Koshi, I'll acknowledge that it was. I made an assumption I should not have.
|
On January 22 2015 03:07 Koshi wrote:Show nested quote +On January 22 2015 03:03 Wile E. Coyote wrote:
I am having a really busy day at work today. Will try to catch up as quickly as possible now. Who are we lynching currently? Sickluster. Which is a terrible lynch. And I don't know wtf you are doing sitting on him.
What? Did you even read what HF/marv/me wrote about him? If he didn't start oozing town since I left I see no reason to lynch anyone over him.
|
United Kingdom10443 Posts
On January 22 2015 03:09 Half the Sky wrote:Show nested quote +On January 22 2015 03:05 KelsierSC wrote:
hmm that's weird because I don't remember there being a question on Dam.
Again Kels, it goes to how you phrased your question:
On January 21 2015 01:25 KelsierSC wrote:
you didn't mention him dodging the question about damd? that felt like a big sidestep [/QUOTE]
but you just said that you didn't agree with me you just didn't argue?
so which is it?
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
