|
On January 14 2015 01:49 marvellosity wrote:
yw. you've not had to deal with a mad vivax and you seem no closer yourself, so how is asking me that question helping you find scum today?
see i can do it too.
Had the answer been enlightening, it might've provided me with an additional reason to read you as townie. As it stands I don't really see a reason for the unvote other than you both being scum and as such you don't want the lynch to end up on Palmar today.
|
On January 14 2015 01:52 GlowingBear wrote:Show nested quote +On January 14 2015 01:43 Artanis[Xp] wrote:On January 14 2015 01:30 GlowingBear wrote:
You look Turkish, Artanis. That's probably the lighting. Is there any reason we shouldn't lynch you today GB? Yes I'm town
Any reason that doesn't require us to have perfect information?
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
pretty doubtful, unless something comes up that's better than what i've seen.
to an extent I agree with Plam that Damdred has been less assertive than I might expect, but the difference is nowhere near what i'm seeing. his push on Superbia d2 was pretty good and actually quite assertive, in some ways it was bad luck (?) that it didn't yield results that day. Also similarly with his VE push (even though wrong)
and a couple of little things like how he questioned sl on his greencheck on him
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On January 14 2015 01:53 Artanis[Xp] wrote:Show nested quote +On January 14 2015 01:49 marvellosity wrote:
yw. you've not had to deal with a mad vivax and you seem no closer yourself, so how is asking me that question helping you find scum today?
see i can do it too. Had the answer been enlightening, it might've provided me with an additional reason to read you as townie. As it stands I don't really see a reason for the unvote other than you both being scum and as such you don't want the lynch to end up on Palmar today.
you've repeatedly banged the (correct) filter size argument for me.
If the answer to that question was what you require to additionally read me as town, you're doin the game wrong.
|
On January 14 2015 01:56 marvellosity wrote:Show nested quote +On January 14 2015 01:53 Artanis[Xp] wrote:On January 14 2015 01:49 marvellosity wrote:
yw. you've not had to deal with a mad vivax and you seem no closer yourself, so how is asking me that question helping you find scum today?
see i can do it too. Had the answer been enlightening, it might've provided me with an additional reason to read you as townie. As it stands I don't really see a reason for the unvote other than you both being scum and as such you don't want the lynch to end up on Palmar today. you've repeatedly banged the (correct) filter size argument for me. If the answer to that question was what you require to additionally read me as town, you're doin the game wrong.
The problem here is that a lot of people have a big filter. The game is 388 pages long. Although I consider it a strong reason to make you town, there's a bunch of things that make me doubt. The interactions between you and Palmar feel so unproductive, for example. You two have so much history together that I'd imagine if you were both town you'd have townreads on each other by this point. Similarly, if one of you was scum and the other was town (though I consider this more of a stretch) I'd expect the suspicions to be much more grounded. It feels like you're kind of avoiding reading each other much like a syllogism/sandroba scum couple would.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On January 14 2015 01:53 Artanis[Xp] wrote:Show nested quote +On January 14 2015 01:49 marvellosity wrote:
yw. you've not had to deal with a mad vivax and you seem no closer yourself, so how is asking me that question helping you find scum today?
see i can do it too. Had the answer been enlightening, it might've provided me with an additional reason to read you as townie. As it stands I don't really see a reason for the unvote other than you both being scum and as such you don't want the lynch to end up on Palmar today.
lmao. Somehow I glazed over this.
Are you serious??
rofl
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
so your contention is that I pushed my vote on to Palmar, explicitly told DP that's what we should do, and told sl to come with me on Palmar, so I could give a non-commital read later?
I'm a bloody genius!
|
You pushed on Palmar expecting him to give a valiant defense that would make both of you look good whilst simultaneously creating a reason for both of you still being alive the next day.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
if I were scum with Palmar I'd know he wouldn't give a good defence, and I wouldn't set him up in a grand fashion to have to do it either.
Get a grip.
|
On January 14 2015 02:04 marvellosity wrote:
if I were scum with Palmar I'd know he wouldn't give a good defence, and I wouldn't set him up in a grand fashion to have to do it either.
Get a grip.
Presuming you'd both be scum you could both expect him to be motivated to set up a great scumgame. Palmar might've believed it himself, then ended up not having as much motivation as he thought he would. The interactions ended up not looking as good as you were hoping for and the plan fell apart. It's really not that hard to imagine.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
ok dear. Go and join Vivax in the crazy corner like a good boy.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
like there is nothing I can say to reasonably deconstruct a conspiracy theory.
that's the nature of a conspiracy theory.
|
On January 14 2015 02:06 marvellosity wrote:
ok dear. Go and join Vivax in the crazy corner like a good boy.
That's okay. I like the company of townies more anyway.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
are you being witty or are you actually flipping your read on me based on this drivel?
|
I Count this vote pholks
Palmar (2): marvellosity, sicklucker, Artanis[Xp]
Lazermonkey (1): GlowingBear
GlowingBear (1): Lazermonkey
Marvellosity (1): Vivax
Not Voting: Chezinu, Marvellosity, Damdred, Palmar, KelsierSC
Currently Palmar is set to be lynched.
Deadline is in
|
On January 14 2015 02:08 marvellosity wrote:
like there is nothing I can say to reasonably deconstruct a conspiracy theory.
that's the nature of a conspiracy theory.
Actually, there's plenty you could do. I already figured a counterargument to my point:
Why would I (you) expect Palmar to step it up and become more active when he has been thoroughly demotivated throughout the game?
You're welcome.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On January 14 2015 02:10 Artanis[Xp] wrote:Show nested quote +On January 14 2015 02:08 marvellosity wrote:
like there is nothing I can say to reasonably deconstruct a conspiracy theory.
that's the nature of a conspiracy theory. Actually, there's plenty you could do. I already figured a counterargument to my point: Why would I (you) expect Palmar to step it up and become more active when he has been thoroughly demotivated throughout the game? You're welcome.
On January 14 2015 02:04 marvellosity wrote:
if I were scum with Palmar I'd know he wouldn't give a good defence, and I wouldn't set him up in a grand fashion to have to do it either.
ya
|
On January 14 2015 02:10 Artanis[Xp] (the better marvellosity) wrote:
Why would I (you) expect Palmar to step it up and become more active when he has been thoroughly demotivated throughout the game?
That's a good point.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
you know that's the first sign of madness, right?
|
On January 14 2015 02:12 Artanis[Xp] wrote:Show nested quote +On January 14 2015 02:10 Artanis[Xp] (the better marvellosity) wrote:
Why would I (you) expect Palmar to step it up and become more active when he has been thoroughly demotivated throughout the game? That's a good point.
So are you dropping the point on Marv?
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
