I am getting the impression that HF is trying to fling shit at me. It seems like he is deliberately misrepresenting me what i do in his posts. For example In this first post he says I am vehemently arguing with gb. However he says im just posting fluff in the second post and in the third post he doesn't even mention my arguing with gb tho it was my defining characteristic before. He just says I have been talking solely about policy. Also I was pressuring LT to post as so far everything he posted is a joke post. He also fails to mention this as well in his sum up of me in his third post as well.
Saying I have been only posting about policy just isn't true so why does he say it?

On October 31 2014 14:09 Holyflare wrote:
there's literally nothing more to talk about on that subject and it's pretty weird that jay is vehemently arguing with gb about it when it's irrelevant game speculation

On October 31 2014 22:43 Holyflare wrote:
jay why is it bad that his posts are fluff when all of yours are the same?

On October 31 2014 23:52 Holyflare wrote:
1) ObiWanShinobi <--- random town reads based off of almost nothing and talking about useless crap
2) Lord Tolkien - useless spam all game, making things up about me to justify vote (still dont even know if it was a joke)
5) risk.nuke - 0 posts
7) Seuss
10) Oatsmaster - aggression but no real commitment and looks really behind when he returns to question things already answered, dunno might take him off
11) Alakaslam - 0 posts
12) Blazinghand - 0 posts (wouldn't be surprised if he was somehow the cat)
13) Damdred - don't really know what he's thinking at all
14) liancourt - potentially could take off he looks jokey enough and has some of his trademark basic reads but meh
17) jaybrundage - cat policy, 3 policy, ?????? policy king

op list post, please contribute to shrinking it

On October 31 2014 14:44 jaybrundage wrote:

Show nested quote +

Dude all of your posts srsly suck you haven't even tried to engage in conversation with anyone.
Every. Single. One. is just trash. and completely unrelated to the thread.

##Vote Lord Tolkien

[QUOTE]On October 31 2014 22:25 jaybrundage wrote:
[QUOTE]On October 31 2014 15:28 Lord Tolkien wrote:
[QUOTE]On October 31 2014 14:44 jaybrundage wrote:
[QUOTE]On October 31 2014 14:40 Lord Tolkien wrote:
[QUOTE]On October 31 2014 14:28 Holyflare wrote:
also LT completely different and i mean COMPLETELY different from his fanfic game and all he's done is talk about useless things that the op contradicts (alignment/role stuff) and wants to lynch/joke lynch me based off of something when he knows that im busy doing something else (he came and saw me playing league) also super weird unvote after gb made a post and then disappearing[/QUOTE]
20 points to gryffindor[/QUOTE]
Dude all of your posts srsly suck you haven't even tried to engage in conversation with anyone.
Every. Single. One. is just trash. and completely unrelated to the thread.

##Vote Lord Tolkien[/QUOTE]
(the point of my post)------>

(your head)

+ Show Spoiler +

aka, HF make very townie read on me, am happeh

[/QUOTE]
@LT Oh sorry, did i miss the point of your post. As far as i could tell it just seemed like fluff.

Oh wait, nope still fluff.

jaybrundage

United States3921 Posts

October 31 2014 19:08 GMT

#484

Reformatted the last two quotes that didn't come out right. That's what i get for not previewing >.<

On October 31 2014 14:44 jaybrundage wrote:

Show nested quote +

Dude all of your posts srsly suck you haven't even tried to engage in conversation with anyone.
Every. Single. One. is just trash. and completely unrelated to the thread.

##Vote Lord Tolkien

On October 31 2014 22:25 jaybrundage wrote:

Show nested quote +

@LT Oh sorry, did i miss the point of your post. As far as i could tell it just seemed like fluff.

Oh wait, nope still fluff.

Alakaslam

United States17336 Posts

October 31 2014 19:14 GMT

#485

HF always likes to put words & intent into posts that weren't ever there.

Does this as both alignments.

jaybrundage

United States3921 Posts

October 31 2014 19:19 GMT

#486

BTW Alakaslam last two games we played you tunneled me as scum and as town. Do you plan to continue this tradition or......

Alakaslam

United States17336 Posts

October 31 2014 19:20 GMT

#487

I don't even remember u phuul

I don't even know what is up with you so I want cat to speak

VisceraEyes

United States21170 Posts

October 31 2014 19:35 GMT

#488

Hi guys.

So who are we lynching eh? I vote for this guy.

On October 31 2014 19:37 risk.nuke wrote:
So have anyone heard of just saying, 'I want to analyze this player'. And then not immediately locking your analyze vote.
The Cat feel super much like third party. And hi.

##Vote: risk.nuke

I find that commenting on something like Bigglesworth being third party as his sole contribution before fucking off to be highly suspect. Like, he was following closely enough to mention the Cat but not enough to mention his reads on anyone? Like, I haven't done much, but people talking about me without looking at risk.nuke need to have their heads examined.

VisceraEyes

United States21170 Posts

October 31 2014 19:36 GMT

#489

Here kitty kitty...what does "Analyze" do, hmmmmm?

Holyflare

United Kingdom30775 Posts

October 31 2014 19:44 GMT

#490

Jay your posts are all policy and i don't need to include you arguing with gb because you were again arguing over policy so there's that, then you also make a giant case thing on me which apparently has no relevance because you're voting for the person I've called mafia...? So not only does that entire post say nothing but you don't even follow through with the nothing on me.

Holyflare

United Kingdom30775 Posts

October 31 2014 19:46 GMT

#491

I didn't even see risk posted when was that

Alakaslam

United States17336 Posts

October 31 2014 19:55 GMT

#492

Hey so like wasn't he massively afk before though?

Why is he scum versus anyone else who is largely inactive?

...

I mean hey he is a better target than me go for it

jrkirby

United States1510 Posts

October 31 2014 19:56 GMT

#493

On November 01 2014 04:36 VisceraEyes wrote:
Here kitty kitty...what does "Analyze" do, hmmmmm?

He told us:

On November 01 2014 00:02 Mr. Bigglesworth wrote:
To clarify things:

I am a player from outside the game. I was summoned by a townie who I must keep in secret.
I'll analyse a player as any player would. This means I will read the thread, focus on that player's posts, and say what I think about him, i.e., make a case.

Talking about me will lead nowhere. I am town aligned but I'm not a killable player. Which means you will gain nothing trying to know who I am or if I am town, mafia or 3rd party, for I'm none.

This is my last post until the first analysis. Meow.

jrkirby

United States1510 Posts

October 31 2014 19:57 GMT

#494

Knowing that, I wouldn't mind an analyse on GB or jay. It's hard to get good reads on them.

Alakaslam

United States17336 Posts

October 31 2014 19:57 GMT

#495

So vote to analyze jay, after all he h8s the cat

jrkirby

United States1510 Posts

October 31 2014 20:05 GMT

#496

Current Analyse counts:

GlowingBear: Suess (1)
Circumstance: Misder (1)
Oatsmaster: Circumstance (1)
JayBrundage: Alakaslam (1)

If either GB or Jay get more anaylse votes, I'll jump on them.

Alakaslam

United States17336 Posts

October 31 2014 20:16 GMT

#497

VE vote jay vote jay

Everyone vote Jay vote jay