|
On October 31 2014 19:37 risk.nuke wrote: So have anyone heard of just saying, 'I want to analyze this player'. And then not immediately locking your analyze vote. The Cat feel super much like third party. And hi.
That's what I did. Also, I agree, the cat does seems to be like a third party ability or something. And hi.
|
I dont think it matters whether its 3rd party. It matters how it analyzes
|
On October 31 2014 15:28 Lord Tolkien wrote:Show nested quote +On October 31 2014 14:44 jaybrundage wrote:On October 31 2014 14:40 Lord Tolkien wrote:On October 31 2014 14:28 Holyflare wrote: also LT completely different and i mean COMPLETELY different from his fanfic game and all he's done is talk about useless things that the op contradicts (alignment/role stuff) and wants to lynch/joke lynch me based off of something when he knows that im busy doing something else (he came and saw me playing league) also super weird unvote after gb made a post and then disappearing 20 points to gryffindor Dude all of your posts srsly suck you haven't even tried to engage in conversation with anyone. Every. Single. One. is just trash. and completely unrelated to the thread. ##Vote Lord Tolkien (the point of my post)------> (your head) + Show Spoiler +aka, HF make very townie read on me, am happeh @LT Oh sorry, did i miss the point of your post. As far as i could tell it just seemed like fluff.
Oh wait, nope still fluff.
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
jay why is it bad that his posts are fluff when all of yours are the same?
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
i mean yes you did "analyse" gb's post but it didn't really say anything about anyone at all other than "yeh gb's post is probably wrong it's too early" and the rest of the game is cat fluff
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On October 31 2014 15:08 Seuss wrote: He basically jumped hard on the first person to post anything remotely suspicious. The post in question wasn't fantastic but it seemed really opportunistic to me.
so you admit that it's at least remotely suspicious and that he drove the discussion forward on this point, why is it scummy then?
|
Holyflare why must you make so much sense.
Actually, what do you think of VE?
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
i dunno ve has pretty basic reads but i actually agree with them and they aren't super obvious reads so that's a plus for now
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
also i don't like how you just threw away circumstances case on you, it was pretty good and it's certainly not about you being aggressive it's that you don't particularly have your own insights onto alignments and are just saying things
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
On October 31 2014 14:31 jaybrundage wrote: If third party wins does it mean that town and mafia lose? or does third party win condition, have an objective they have to fufill so they can win with either Mafia or town?
You don't know. Hence: ?????
On October 31 2014 14:08 Misder wrote: Will mods answer questions about the mechanics of Mr. Bigglesworth?
Mr. Bigglesworth is allowed to post in the thread and is not a mod.
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
##vote lord tolkien
just gonna do this till he stops trolling
|
On October 31 2014 15:21 VisceraEyes wrote: I like HF and Misder too.
HF and Misder making posts that make me think they're thinking about the game critically. I think they town.
Me HF Misder and GB town.
JayB maybe trying to pocket me. He might just like my vernacular, but him saying #yoloswagtownmayor in response to a one-liner townread feels.....excessive I guess.
I'm sorry, I don't get your read on Misder. He is basically throwing random questions everywhere which leads to nowhere.
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
i had the same feeling as ve that misder looks like he's trying to figure things out even if it is kind of broken into parts
|
On October 31 2014 14:25 Holyflare wrote:Show nested quote +On October 31 2014 14:23 Oatsmaster wrote: Use it on the scummiest person. End of discussion.
If we dont use it, no loss.
Hey Holyflare, has anything popped out as being interesting to you? misder giving me some weird feels 1. went role fishing 2. questioned gb uselessly about his vote being in an illegitimate format 3. talking about the cat repeatedly 4. wants to analyse obi specifically when he hasn't even been here when there's multiple others that are the same
What changed from this?
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
he answered all of them are you even reading the thread??
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
it was his answers that obviously gave me the not scummy lean because they actually showed a thought process behind whatever he was saying even if it is a little bit misguided at times
|
On October 31 2014 23:15 Holyflare wrote: he answered all of them are you even reading the thread??
Not again, HF... Yes, I'm reading the thread, yes, he answered. I want you to specifically point out what on his answers/latest posts made you change your mind.
Like, it just looks like you're just sheeping VE.
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
well then that's too fucking bad i'll sheep ve on his super pro read then
|
Also, I'm voting Slam because in not giving lurkers a chance.
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
we are most probably going to analyse slam so use a vote on who you actually think is scummy instead please
|
|
|
|