EPT/in
I got time coming up I actually liked the setup just hope i get poisoner thi stime
Fantasy Football Mafia Mini 2
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Damdred
15669 Posts
/in I got time coming up I actually liked the setup just hope i get poisoner thi stime | ||
|
Damdred
15669 Posts
| ||
|
Damdred
15669 Posts
| ||
|
Damdred
15669 Posts
 but i'll be fine | ||
|
Damdred
15669 Posts
Trololol just like old tims | ||
|
Damdred
15669 Posts
| ||
|
Damdred
15669 Posts
| ||
|
Damdred
15669 Posts
| ||
|
Damdred
15669 Posts
Storr is my other scumlean just feels forced, the tunnel things feels off as well I'll have to reread another game I played with him but he says he doesn't tunnel as town. | ||
|
Damdred
15669 Posts
Storr in the first fantasy game you said tunneling is not part of your town meta you just scum hunt basically. But you say its a joke now since its what happened last game with lian however your tone feels a bit off. And you do feel a bit forced and insincere | ||
|
Damdred
15669 Posts
On October 23 2014 22:22 StorrZerg wrote: yeah lets not have discussion day 1. so who be that town read Why does it have to be giving town reads=discussion on day 1? I think the correlation isn't their necessarily whats important is asking questions and actually talking not throwing out "oh hey this person is town". That doesn't work for the way I like to play I have my note pad with my town notes in it on people otherwise I talk to people in the thread and question and scum read people. Its pretty obvious who my town read is....not sure why you even have to ask. | ||
|
Damdred
15669 Posts
| ||
|
Damdred
15669 Posts
On October 23 2014 22:56 raynpelikoneet wrote: Giving out townreads is just as important than giving out scumreads. It helps people to figure out your alignment and reduces the chance of mislynchable ppl in case your read is correct. Maybe so if you are fighting for that person later on, but just right now based on nothing why should people be throwing out town reads? I don't think its helpful And why hf? | ||
|
Damdred
15669 Posts
| ||
|
Damdred
15669 Posts
| ||
|
Damdred
15669 Posts
On October 23 2014 23:12 StorrZerg wrote: sorry got buried by kush can you explain "doing things" honestly seems no effort from you in doing anything with your reads. I think you are being obtuse for no reason, JAT is pressuring people giving thoughts on the thread and is helping shape the thread. Its pretty obvious that JAT is doing things that are pro-town and is town so far from his play. Not sure what you want me to be doing with my reads currently? | ||
|
Damdred
15669 Posts
And to be honest, rolling scum is tiring you have to fake everything can't post to much or give things away. Hard to fake reads etc, so yea I really wanted to play my last game and couldn't so i'm happy i finally get to play a game instead of sitting on the sidelines if that makes sense. @Storr, I was asked what my scum leans were I said who and why. They were both legitimate reasons and the reasons I lean'd you as scum haven't changed at all your tone still sounds fake, feels like you are just going through the motions. And I actually you know found the game where you talked about your tunneling and if it was a town tell or not. @HF could you tell me what you th ink of robiks post? | ||
|
Damdred
15669 Posts
On October 23 2014 23:38 liancourt wrote: no you were pretty serious with jat for some reason What do you think from this observation? | ||
|
Damdred
15669 Posts
Why are you telling people to move on and ignore someone when they are doing scummy things to that person? Talk about Robik and his posts if you would hf | ||
|
Damdred
15669 Posts
On October 23 2014 23:57 Holyflare wrote: because talking about one person repeatedly isn't alignment indicative in the slightest and i'd rather he fleshed out some more reads so we can get a better read on him? don't want to comment specifically on individual robik posts but i agree with what he's saying so far Ok to your first point you made me feel dumb, I didn't think about that. Do you agree with all of his reads so far? Such a blanket statement hard to respond to you on that one | ||
| ||
