|
On October 25 2014 09:14 Damdred wrote:
For someone who is trying to use my filter to show in scummy are you sure you read it GB?
I asked for clarification about a post you made about me talking to robik and asking about thawn
On I thought you were talking about the vote on you.
Can you quote the post please? I don't know which one you're talking about now.
|
On October 25 2014 08:10 kushm4sta wrote:
imo d1 lynches should have a strong policy component to them, just because of how much uncertainty there is d1.
I know where this is headed
On October 25 2014 08:20 kushm4sta wrote:Show nested quote +On October 25 2014 08:12 DrParnassus wrote:
kush what makes you think slam parking his vote on me is a scum tactic? he did that many times as town on omgus regardless of my alignment its a lazy vote regardless
Well an absent person cannot work
On October 25 2014 08:21 DrParnassus wrote:Show nested quote +On October 25 2014 08:20 kushm4sta wrote:On October 25 2014 08:12 DrParnassus wrote:
kush what makes you think slam parking his vote on me is a scum tactic? he did that many times as town on omgus regardless of my alignment its a lazy vote regardless do you expect more from him?
In light of how I know where this is going this is really funny
Tell this to Gorf
|
On October 25 2014 09:13 Fecalfeast wrote:
GB, to clarify, that post that says "Damdy" and then a single quote is your entire case on damdred?
Mostly.
|
batsnacks
+ Show Spoiler +-useless "fight" with slam. I can appreciate lighthearted fun but there's always a difference between a townie having fun and mafia pretending to be a townie having fun. When a townie is joking with another player there is often a hint of suspicion underneath the trolling, as if the townie might actually just be playing good cop in order to catch another player off guard. When mafia pretends to bea townie having fun, the emphasis is 100% on the fun without any hint of possible scumhunting hidden underneath the fun. batsnacks seems to be forcing his jokes on top of that. -I think kush's wk post makes sense. There is no reason for batsnacks to flatter robik so much unless bat is scum and robik is town. -uselss questions as someone else pointed out. maybe holyflare? stuff like this: On October 24 2014 07:20 batsnacks wrote:Show nested quote +On October 24 2014 07:18 Fecalfeast wrote:
Storr are you saying you have not found lian scummy at all this game and your vote was actually just because he said he was baiting you?
I missed your post where you accepted him as a new player, so I guess I have been skimming a little but I read your post more serious.
FF you said that something about Liam preferring anti-town arguments but he never said that, this is what he said: Show nested quote +I ll take on any argument regardless of motivation whether it be pro town anti town because i enjoy the debating side of it. So did you skim that post or are you just reaching for reasons to scum read the guy who's "shitposting"? He may as well ask "Are you town or mafia?" -other than the unhelpful questions that won't find mafia, he's spent most of the game talking about fecalfeast I think all the above has been covered already. I have one more thing though: On October 24 2014 06:56 batsnacks wrote:Show nested quote +On October 24 2014 06:52 DrParnassus wrote:On October 24 2014 06:50 batsnacks wrote:
I think robik looks pretty solid. I like how he's posting; he's focused, not all caps, consolidated, no personal dramas, that stuff is what reminds me of hard to get along with robik. @DrParnassus what about robik this game seem hard to cooperate with? Could you quote an example? You did say -everything about the way he's playing- reminds you of that. it's his attitude in general, his arrogance Is it arrogance or non-cooperativeness? Or is his arrogance making him hard to cooperate with? I asked robik a question he apparently has already answered and he answered it again for me and didn't even call me dumb. Are you sure you're not just biased because he said you were mafia? The bolded part suggests batsnacks knows I'm town. I wouldn;t be biased in the way batsnacks suggests if I was mafia. His statement only works if he's pretty sure about me being town.
|
On October 25 2014 08:23 kushm4sta wrote:Show nested quote +On October 25 2014 08:21 DrParnassus wrote:On October 25 2014 08:20 kushm4sta wrote:On October 25 2014 08:12 DrParnassus wrote:
kush what makes you think slam parking his vote on me is a scum tactic? he did that many times as town on omgus regardless of my alignment its a lazy vote regardless do you expect more from him? on omgus he just won an endgame as the only scum left. so im extra wary of him atm.
BOOM HEADSHOT lol
First post of te next page
|
On October 25 2014 08:42 justanothertownie wrote:Show nested quote +On October 25 2014 08:15 liancourt wrote:On October 25 2014 08:10 kushm4sta wrote:
imo d1 lynches should have a strong policy component to them, just because of how much uncertainty there is d1. who would you policy lynch? i'd go for elvis or superbia if it were for policy. Why on earth would you policy lynch superbia?
hasn't done much since he's been replaced or is there a grace period for replacees
|
Canada11355 Posts
Ok parnassus ibget it you're not mafia I'll unvote when i go inside
|
On October 25 2014 09:13 justanothertownie wrote:Show nested quote +On October 25 2014 09:10 Alakaslam wrote:
About page 57 I think I want to Unvote thrawn. It is a shame Rayn has left
Decal feast you may want to look at GB
Rayn if you get back before deadline you too
For now I just UNVOTE and continue reading Explain the GB thing. The thrawn unvote is probably a good idea.
GlowingBear was all over Thrawn shouting some shit like WHO IS SCUM
Well Kush can tell you one way I bought Ez TOWNCRED was to push the current town lynch by saying to him "but who is scum then?"
All so familiar.
Nonetheless as town I have asked the same question so it could be a coincidence. This is why I am not voting him yet
|
On October 25 2014 09:18 liancourt wrote:Show nested quote +On October 25 2014 08:42 justanothertownie wrote:On October 25 2014 08:15 liancourt wrote:On October 25 2014 08:10 kushm4sta wrote:
imo d1 lynches should have a strong policy component to them, just because of how much uncertainty there is d1. who would you policy lynch? i'd go for elvis or superbia if it were for policy. Why on earth would you policy lynch superbia? hasn't done much since he's been replaced or is there a grace period for replacees
Man, he just voted for FF and peace'd out.
|
|
|
i wouldn't lynch storr (superb) i don't think. At least not yet. I think his 5 pages of pseudo content is good enough for me for now. We'll let superbia take over and decide on the role from there.
I think kush and batsnacks would probably be my top 2 choices right now. I think that there is very little opposition to a thrawn lynch and that scares me.
Conversely, I could probably lynch thrawn because he's kinda scummy.
Just my quick thoughts as the day winds down
|
On October 25 2014 09:14 Fecalfeast wrote:
i decided I don't quote on phone anymore and outside frying my brains
Sson I will teach you the art
For I am on the phone as I type this.
You hold it sideways or straight up?
Btw Unvote thrawn
|
On October 25 2014 09:22 Alakaslam wrote:Show nested quote +On October 25 2014 09:13 justanothertownie wrote:On October 25 2014 09:10 Alakaslam wrote:
About page 57 I think I want to Unvote thrawn. It is a shame Rayn has left
Decal feast you may want to look at GB
Rayn if you get back before deadline you too
For now I just UNVOTE and continue reading Explain the GB thing. The thrawn unvote is probably a good idea. GlowingBear was all over Thrawn shouting some shit like WHO IS SCUM Well Kush can tell you one way I bought Ez TOWNCRED was to push the current town lynch by saying to him "but who is scum then?" All so familiar. Nonetheless as town I have asked the same question so it could be a coincidence. This is why I am not voting him yet
Lol slam.
I asked because I need his reads and reactions to evaluate him and he wasn't answering me.
|
Oh shit. Yeah. I'd also lynch Rayn. He hasn't really done anything. Bunch of false promises and self-overexaggerations about the quality of his play
|
Canada11355 Posts
I hold it straight up i should try horizontal
|
On October 25 2014 09:18 DrParnassus wrote:batsnacks+ Show Spoiler +-useless "fight" with slam. I can appreciate lighthearted fun but there's always a difference between a townie having fun and mafia pretending to be a townie having fun. When a townie is joking with another player there is often a hint of suspicion underneath the trolling, as if the townie might actually just be playing good cop in order to catch another player off guard. When mafia pretends to bea townie having fun, the emphasis is 100% on the fun without any hint of possible scumhunting hidden underneath the fun. batsnacks seems to be forcing his jokes on top of that. -I think kush's wk post makes sense. There is no reason for batsnacks to flatter robik so much unless bat is scum and robik is town. -uselss questions as someone else pointed out. maybe holyflare? stuff like this: On October 24 2014 07:20 batsnacks wrote:Show nested quote +On October 24 2014 07:18 Fecalfeast wrote:
Storr are you saying you have not found lian scummy at all this game and your vote was actually just because he said he was baiting you?
I missed your post where you accepted him as a new player, so I guess I have been skimming a little but I read your post more serious.
FF you said that something about Liam preferring anti-town arguments but he never said that, this is what he said: Show nested quote +I ll take on any argument regardless of motivation whether it be pro town anti town because i enjoy the debating side of it. So did you skim that post or are you just reaching for reasons to scum read the guy who's "shitposting"? He may as well ask "Are you town or mafia?" -other than the unhelpful questions that won't find mafia, he's spent most of the game talking about fecalfeast I think all the above has been covered already. I have one more thing though: On October 24 2014 06:56 batsnacks wrote:Show nested quote +On October 24 2014 06:52 DrParnassus wrote:On October 24 2014 06:50 batsnacks wrote:
I think robik looks pretty solid. I like how he's posting; he's focused, not all caps, consolidated, no personal dramas, that stuff is what reminds me of hard to get along with robik. @DrParnassus what about robik this game seem hard to cooperate with? Could you quote an example? You did say -everything about the way he's playing- reminds you of that. it's his attitude in general, his arrogance Is it arrogance or non-cooperativeness? Or is his arrogance making him hard to cooperate with? I asked robik a question he apparently has already answered and he answered it again for me and didn't even call me dumb. Are you sure you're not just biased because he said you were mafia? The bolded part suggests batsnacks knows I'm town. I wouldn;t be biased in the way batsnacks suggests if I was mafia. His statement only works if he's pretty sure about me being town.
Hmm, yeah I disliked that last quote too. Still can't really decide which one of this guy and FF is scummier.
|
On October 25 2014 09:23 IAmRobik wrote:
i wouldn't lynch storr (superb) i don't think. At least not yet. I think his 5 pages of pseudo content is good enough for me for now. We'll let superbia take over and decide on the role from there.
I think kush and batsnacks would probably be my top 2 choices right now. I think that there is very little opposition to a thrawn lynch and that scares me.
Conversely, I could probably lynch thrawn because he's kinda scummy.
Just my quick thoughts as the day winds down
Gentlemen, here's an example of fluff.
"I wouldn't lynch storr I think"
"Kush and batsnacks my top 2 scums but I don't know..."
"I'm afraid to lynch thrawn but I would lynch town but I don't know..."
|
On October 25 2014 09:23 raynpelikoneet wrote:
lol. Lymch hf.
I still don't get why you want this bro, I don't understand how your case is about alignment indicative stuff
Nonetheless if I cannot find a better one I am with you on this
|
On October 25 2014 09:18 liancourt wrote:Show nested quote +On October 25 2014 08:42 justanothertownie wrote:On October 25 2014 08:15 liancourt wrote:On October 25 2014 08:10 kushm4sta wrote:
imo d1 lynches should have a strong policy component to them, just because of how much uncertainty there is d1. who would you policy lynch? i'd go for elvis or superbia if it were for policy. Why on earth would you policy lynch superbia? hasn't done much since he's been replaced or is there a grace period for replacees
You would lynch the slot that had the biggest filter at some point for inactivity? r u srs?
|
On October 25 2014 09:26 GlowingBear wrote:Show nested quote +On October 25 2014 09:23 IAmRobik wrote:
i wouldn't lynch storr (superb) i don't think. At least not yet. I think his 5 pages of pseudo content is good enough for me for now. We'll let superbia take over and decide on the role from there.
I think kush and batsnacks would probably be my top 2 choices right now. I think that there is very little opposition to a thrawn lynch and that scares me.
Conversely, I could probably lynch thrawn because he's kinda scummy.
Just my quick thoughts as the day winds down Gentlemen, here's an example of fluff. "I wouldn't lynch storr I think" "Kush and batsnacks my top 2 scums but I don't know..." "I'm afraid to lynch thrawn but I would lynch town but I don't know..."
Yes. I'm mafia. You caught me. You're awesome. High five. Now go bury yourself in a hole cause you don't know what you're doing/saying
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
