EPTSeason of the Witch Mafia
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
ritoky
United States6851 Posts
| ||
|
ritoky
United States6851 Posts
On September 04 2014 09:49 gobbledydook wrote: why? You have given no reason at all. why is your name so bad? | ||
|
ritoky
United States6851 Posts
seems highly relevant to me, i have to type it | ||
|
ritoky
United States6851 Posts
On September 04 2014 10:10 IAmRobik wrote: OK! Now that geript finally realizes what's wrong with Goobly's vote to give geript the grail, I'll elaborate on what's confusing me. Unless Goobly hasn't been reading geript's post, Goobly knows that geript wants to lynch him, so why would goobly give geript the grail? 1) he's mafia and he wants to get on geripts good side 2) he's town and he has faith that geript will change his opinion on him But if he's town, wouldn't he follow-up a statement like: by saying "and i'm sure by the end of today, his opinion on me will change" Unless of course he's mafia and he's basically maf!claiming that geript would use the grail well, cause geript wants to lynch him. I guess I'm biased-ly leaning towards him being mafia, but idk...maybe he's just town that has faith in geript...BUT WHY WOULD HE HAVE FAITH IN GERIPT IF GERIPT IS VOTING HIM? UGHAODSFHNAOSINGFSDOIFGN I DON'T FUCKING GET IT! really i thought his reasoning was shit for an entirely different reason. that quote to me seems like he wants to give geript the grail for ogi/preconceived reasons. "he's a good player overall"; that's great...i think many players are good players, but i wouldn't give them the grail for that reason alone. | ||
|
ritoky
United States6851 Posts
On September 04 2014 11:52 IAmRobik wrote: I think everyone should visit me tonight i think everyone sees you jerking off enough in this thread. | ||
|
ritoky
United States6851 Posts
On September 04 2014 11:47 gobbledydook wrote: Like, I asked wtf, and because he didn't respond, I came to the conclusion that he is just stirring shit up. what do you make of the fact that he is not the first person to do it. in fact yamato77 basically did the exact same thing. why didn't you question him? | ||
|
ritoky
United States6851 Posts
On September 04 2014 12:00 gobbledydook wrote: I also asked yamato why. Read my filter. ok then, here's a better question. why do you not care about people responding to your questions when you find them odd/scummy? | ||
|
ritoky
United States6851 Posts
On September 04 2014 12:53 slOosh wrote: ritoky, what should we do with the Grail? i would prefer to treat it like how we elect the mayor in cell mafia. people make campaigns for it and justify their campaign with solid reads on the game. it renders it down to less choices so we don't have a bunch of sporadic votes on random people so that later in the game we can potentially gain information from the grail vote. | ||
|
ritoky
United States6851 Posts
On September 04 2014 13:38 Sylencia wrote: God, I just realised there's no way to confirm we have more dead good guys than bad without oracle claiming  If that's the case, I'd still rather have haunt/oracle combine targets over inquisitor/oracle combo. Sure, inquisitors are going to check dubious players, but I'd rather have a checked player alive for the sake of having the confirmed players go up rather than keeping ourselves in the dark for the players who are alive. Am I making sense or am I not understanding something? can you stop talking purely about process and actually talk about players in the game and finding scum? | ||
|
ritoky
United States6851 Posts
On September 04 2014 13:41 Sylencia wrote: I would, but I'm not reading the actual thread at the moment because I'm at work - I just looked at the latest posts to see what was being said at the time so you're not posting to contribute to the game in a meaningful way or find scum, you're just posting to say "hey guys i am here, did you notice?" great welcome, you're the first person on my scum list. | ||
|
ritoky
United States6851 Posts
i don't think koshi is scum yet; but he is leaning that way. i have only played 2 games with him, and the one where he was town he wanted to actively grab the game by the balls and lead town. the fact that he doesn't want to do that and seems content passing the grail to one of his town reads in geript isn't in line w/ the previous town play i experienced of his. | ||
|
ritoky
United States6851 Posts
| ||
|
ritoky
United States6851 Posts
On September 04 2014 13:50 Sylencia wrote: No, because the proposal given is an isolated train of thought that isn't connected (as far as I know) to the rest of the game that is going on. Apparently lurking instead of tryingto expand on an idea when I can't actually do anything else is scummy though so.. ok. not using your time to find scum, even if you only have limited capabilities at the time is scummy. | ||
|
ritoky
United States6851 Posts
On September 04 2014 13:52 Oatsmaster wrote: Ritoky, why did sloosh ask you that softball question? Was there previous interaction that I missed? Sloosh is scum cause he hasn't done anything useful yet. Just asked a few useless questions. So he has the time to post a bit but doesn't do anything with that time. no idea why he asked me; probably because most of my previous posts had been joke insults against gobble and robik and he wanted me to talk about the game. but it didn't seem like a question that was posed in a way to gain any alignment indicative information...actually a couple of his other question posts are kinda like that too. | ||
|
ritoky
United States6851 Posts
On September 04 2014 13:58 Sylencia wrote: that's not the point that they're trying to make though. Basically the act of coming to the thread to check what's been posted in the latest page because I only have 15-20 minutes, posting something that is related to a proposal which is, or at least seems to be, an isolated suggestion which is not relevant to anything that happened in the past 5 or so hours and trying to expand on that is actually a negative thing. From what I understand, I'm better off posting nothing and not giving any opinion on what was suggested because entry posts are oh-so-important. why are you so defensive over this? all i am saying is that goal #1 of town is to find and lynch scum, you're not spending your time doing this; thus you're scummy. | ||
|
ritoky
United States6851 Posts
| ||
|
ritoky
United States6851 Posts
On September 04 2014 14:09 slOosh wrote: Not only that his actions are shutting down potentially good town discussion of setup. While in normal games setup talk is something scum favor because it is safe to do, this is a unique theme game, and setup talk can be very pro town. The discussion of actions, even if we don't arrive at a consensus, is a great means of developing information and reads. I think there is a distinct difference between someone ONLY talking about the set-up and theorizing about optimal play and someone who is both interacting with the thread and talking about setup. gobble and robik for example is doing the latter and i think that is just fine. whereas syl is purely talking about setup and process which i don't find fine. however oats is town as hell right now. i am town and that guy has literally had the exact same thought as me 3 times almost consecutively. i would even consider voting him for grail at this point. | ||
|
ritoky
United States6851 Posts
| ||
|
ritoky
United States6851 Posts
On September 04 2014 14:24 slOosh wrote: Some people find it really easy to ease into games while others build into it. Both as town and as scum. Furthermore it's a themed setup where everyone has a role, so maybe "playing like blue" is kicking in. My point is that shutting down things so early in a 72 hour Day 1 doesn't really help us since you don't know if you just shut down scum or town. All you know is you shut them down. I'm actually inclined to think gobbleygook and sylencia more townish for their setup discussions. agree with gobble, not sylencia. | ||
|
ritoky
United States6851 Posts
On September 04 2014 14:30 slOosh wrote: Cool. Could you elaborate on the difference you perceive? Because I'm of the opinion their approaches to it are similar. didn't i just say the difference in my previous post? like literally the post before this? (actually 2 i think) | ||
| ||
