|
On April 04 2014 00:39 justanothertownie wrote:Show nested quote +On April 04 2014 00:34 raynpelikoneet wrote:On April 04 2014 00:26 justanothertownie wrote:On April 04 2014 00:25 raynpelikoneet wrote:On April 04 2014 00:24 justanothertownie wrote:On April 04 2014 00:21 raynpelikoneet wrote:On April 04 2014 00:20 Keirathi wrote:
I liked Killing's first few posts. They were carefree and fun loving.
Then he went all weird and nonsensical when he was questioning jat.
Idgi He thought he found something and got caught in the moment of distraction. Pretty obvious. He couldn't even explain whatever it was he was thinking... That's not true. Ok. Tell me. Just because he is wrong / you think he is stupid and/or saying bad doesn't mean he didn't explain himself because he quite clearly did. Well, what did he say then rayn? You seem to know.
He said you caring about the reasoning on one read but not the other is weird.
Then he said you might be scum for it because you could be waiting for someone to give a read that might end up being wrong in the end if they flip scum, you might want to pidgeon hole them into a read that you hope will make them look scummy. You're still my top scum read because of the amount of fluff and the feigning participation you've done.
I think that's a pretty clear explanation to what he thinks.
|
If you do not understand it jat it has nothing to do with if he explained it or not because it can't get much clearer from that.
He says you are not sure mafia for it. He says "there is no way i can explain that better, it does not necessarily make you mafia but i am keeping my eye on you. So if you are town drop this conversation and go scumhunt please".
Like i don't know how he can possibly explain himself better than what he did.
|
On April 04 2014 00:44 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On April 04 2014 00:39 justanothertownie wrote:On April 04 2014 00:34 raynpelikoneet wrote:On April 04 2014 00:26 justanothertownie wrote:On April 04 2014 00:25 raynpelikoneet wrote:On April 04 2014 00:24 justanothertownie wrote:On April 04 2014 00:21 raynpelikoneet wrote:On April 04 2014 00:20 Keirathi wrote:
I liked Killing's first few posts. They were carefree and fun loving.
Then he went all weird and nonsensical when he was questioning jat.
Idgi He thought he found something and got caught in the moment of distraction. Pretty obvious. He couldn't even explain whatever it was he was thinking... That's not true. Ok. Tell me. Just because he is wrong / you think he is stupid and/or saying bad doesn't mean he didn't explain himself because he quite clearly did. Well, what did he say then rayn? You seem to know. He said you caring about the reasoning on one read but not the other is weird. Then he said you might be scum for it because you could be waiting for someone to give a read that might end up being wrong in the end if they flip scum, you might want to pidgeon hole them into a read that you hope will make them look scummy. You're still my top scum read because of the amount of fluff and the feigning participation you've done. I think that's a pretty clear explanation to what he thinks.
If I want to read what he said I can look that up myself. The point is that it makes no sense. I don't see the connection between asking for one read and the baiting part - I don't understand it at all and no, he didn't explain it. Am I being dumb here?
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On April 04 2014 00:42 Dandel Ion wrote:Show nested quote +On April 04 2014 00:41 Holyflare wrote:On April 04 2014 00:33 Dandel Ion wrote:On April 04 2014 00:30 iamperfection wrote:
Very meh on that dandel. yeah i know i dont expect him to be lynched to day i do it all for the i-told-you-so cred points. Why is your vote on him then? a very good and astute question maybe you should ask it again.
Why is your vote on him then?
|
On April 04 2014 00:47 justanothertownie wrote:Show nested quote +On April 04 2014 00:44 raynpelikoneet wrote:On April 04 2014 00:39 justanothertownie wrote:On April 04 2014 00:34 raynpelikoneet wrote:On April 04 2014 00:26 justanothertownie wrote:On April 04 2014 00:25 raynpelikoneet wrote:On April 04 2014 00:24 justanothertownie wrote:On April 04 2014 00:21 raynpelikoneet wrote:On April 04 2014 00:20 Keirathi wrote:
I liked Killing's first few posts. They were carefree and fun loving.
Then he went all weird and nonsensical when he was questioning jat.
Idgi He thought he found something and got caught in the moment of distraction. Pretty obvious. He couldn't even explain whatever it was he was thinking... That's not true. Ok. Tell me. Just because he is wrong / you think he is stupid and/or saying bad doesn't mean he didn't explain himself because he quite clearly did. Well, what did he say then rayn? You seem to know. He said you caring about the reasoning on one read but not the other is weird. Then he said you might be scum for it because you could be waiting for someone to give a read that might end up being wrong in the end if they flip scum, you might want to pidgeon hole them into a read that you hope will make them look scummy. You're still my top scum read because of the amount of fluff and the feigning participation you've done. I think that's a pretty clear explanation to what he thinks. If I want to read what he said I can look that up myself. The point is that it makes no sense. I don't see the connection between asking for one read and the baiting part - I don't understand it at all and no, he didn't explain it. Am I being dumb here?
Yeah you are. Just because you don't understand his explanation does not mean he did not give an explanation. 
|
On April 04 2014 00:47 Holyflare wrote:Show nested quote +On April 04 2014 00:42 Dandel Ion wrote:On April 04 2014 00:41 Holyflare wrote:On April 04 2014 00:33 Dandel Ion wrote:On April 04 2014 00:30 iamperfection wrote:
Very meh on that dandel. yeah i know i dont expect him to be lynched to day i do it all for the i-told-you-so cred points. Why is your vote on him then? a very good and astute question maybe you should ask it again. Why is your vote on him then?
iamp meant the oats stuff, not kita.
that you were supposed to ask it again meant that i wanted you to read it again and realize your folly.
|
EBWOP: ..or does it make sense or not. That was not where i was commenting on because i don't think he was on the same page with you. But he DID explain himself, that's what i was saying, not that he made sense..
|
On April 04 2014 00:50 raynpelikoneet wrote:
EBWOP: ..or does it make sense or not. That was not where i was commenting on because i don't think he was on the same page with you. But he DID explain himself, that's what i was saying, not that he made sense..
My point was that he wasn't explaining what I just asked you. Whatever, I will drop it for now and see what he does next.
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On April 04 2014 00:49 Dandel Ion wrote:Show nested quote +On April 04 2014 00:47 Holyflare wrote:On April 04 2014 00:42 Dandel Ion wrote:On April 04 2014 00:41 Holyflare wrote:On April 04 2014 00:33 Dandel Ion wrote:On April 04 2014 00:30 iamperfection wrote:
Very meh on that dandel. yeah i know i dont expect him to be lynched to day i do it all for the i-told-you-so cred points. Why is your vote on him then? a very good and astute question maybe you should ask it again. Why is your vote on him then? iamp meant the oats stuff, not kita. that you were supposed to ask it again meant that i wanted you to read it again and realize your folly.
So you're sticking to the policy lynch then?
|
from my experience, what you should be looking for is whether he does something next or not
|
On April 04 2014 00:51 justanothertownie wrote:Show nested quote +On April 04 2014 00:50 raynpelikoneet wrote:
EBWOP: ..or does it make sense or not. That was not where i was commenting on because i don't think he was on the same page with you. But he DID explain himself, that's what i was saying, not that he made sense.. My point was that he wasn't explaining what I just asked you. Whatever, I will drop it for now and see what he does next.
Well maybe you are on page 1 he is on page 2 and i am on page 3. idk.
Anyways if you have a problem with him ask him.
lynch austin? i have a really good case on him.
|
On April 04 2014 00:52 Dandel Ion wrote:
from my experience, what you should be looking for is whether he does something next or not
Really?
|
On April 04 2014 00:52 Holyflare wrote:Show nested quote +On April 04 2014 00:49 Dandel Ion wrote:On April 04 2014 00:47 Holyflare wrote:On April 04 2014 00:42 Dandel Ion wrote:On April 04 2014 00:41 Holyflare wrote:On April 04 2014 00:33 Dandel Ion wrote:On April 04 2014 00:30 iamperfection wrote:
Very meh on that dandel. yeah i know i dont expect him to be lynched to day i do it all for the i-told-you-so cred points. Why is your vote on him then? a very good and astute question maybe you should ask it again. Why is your vote on him then? iamp meant the oats stuff, not kita. that you were supposed to ask it again meant that i wanted you to read it again and realize your folly. So you're sticking to the policy lynch then?
I don't know.
He's the best lynch for now, I couldn't begin to try to predict if a better one is going to come around or not.
|
although maybe gumshoe already is, meh
too much muddy waters.
|
On April 04 2014 00:52 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On April 04 2014 00:51 justanothertownie wrote:On April 04 2014 00:50 raynpelikoneet wrote:
EBWOP: ..or does it make sense or not. That was not where i was commenting on because i don't think he was on the same page with you. But he DID explain himself, that's what i was saying, not that he made sense.. My point was that he wasn't explaining what I just asked you. Whatever, I will drop it for now and see what he does next. Well maybe you are on page 1 he is on page 2 and i am on page 3. idk. Anyways if you have a problem with him ask him. lynch austin? i have a really good case on him.
Your case didn't really convince me to be honest. But I expect more from town austin than what he did this game.
|
On April 04 2014 00:31 iamperfection wrote:
This is getting to be a long shower balla where you at?
Just finished pg 52, but this x100. I am starting to believe balla could be scum. I think he'd be more nervous to post as scum than as town.
|
On April 03 2014 23:18 Keirathi wrote:Show nested quote +On April 03 2014 23:14 IAmRobik wrote:On April 03 2014 23:07 syllogism wrote:On April 03 2014 22:59 IAmRobik wrote:On April 03 2014 22:30 Palmar wrote:On April 03 2014 22:19 IAmRobik wrote:On April 03 2014 22:17 Palmar wrote:On April 03 2014 22:14 IAmRobik wrote:
I hate that Palmar is town this game.
I learned new term in awful foreign land. ROBIK IS TMI-ING PRETTY HARD NOW. Although I can't verify, not sure i'm town. TMI = too much info? Did I TMI when I called you out as mafia instantly? You still give me 0 fucking credit. Fucking pathetic Initially, you think I'm weak. So you call me mafia. Then you realize, I am strong. You must try to win my favor. I am sorry Robik, I don't believe in violence. But we must investigate. Investigation shall be performed using a rope and a tree. I hope this does not come between us. I mean. If you are town then you're trying to lynch another town, so that's playing against your win-con. I know mine says something along the lines of I win with town.I don't need to win anyone's favor. I'm not here to make friends. I'm not here to make anyone feel good about themselves. I'm here because I like competition and because I want to win. I am town, thus I'm trying to solve the game. I don't think you're a strong player. I was told by Mattchew that you're good, but I didn't see any good town play from you in Foundations and I was able to determine that you were mafia based off of one measly sentence in Heavyweight Champ. You are clearly smart so you know mafia is a game of incomplete information and thus townie attempting to lynch a townie is unavoidable. So why are you saying something like this? It looks off to me; something a carleess mafia is more likely to say than a smart townie. As for the rest, the best way to win as either alignment is by making friends, even if just for the duration of the game. That's all fine and dandy from your POV, but like -- I don't play that way. So you won't find me sucking up to people and trying to befriend them during the game. I'm gonna be aggressive. I'm gonna take weird fucking stances that no one is going to understand and I'm going to tell you what I'm thinking when I'm thinking it. As for the first part of what you're saying -- I know mislynches happen, but fuck that. I never wanna mislynch and I never wanna be mislynched. Just a hot tip: calling anyone who ever things you might be scum "fucking awful" and screaming about how you are "obvs 100% town" probably isn't the way to go about that. Just sayin'.
So if hes doing something that clearly doesn't help his cause, doesn't that make him town? I just get the sense from Robik's posting that hes more concerned about being right than living and you cant exactly be right in this scenario if your scum / : he had a similar outburst in cultured when Rayn attacked him early on, so this is definitely not alien behaviour from him.
|
On April 04 2014 00:54 Dandel Ion wrote:
although maybe gumshoe already is, meh
too much muddy waters.
So I take it the whole point of your post was to see who jumped on you for it? Am I scum for walking into such an obvious trap?
Question 1: would you be frowning on anyone who attacked you like I did, or was it something specific about me?
Question 2: Do you consider yourself a fan of cotton candy?
|
On April 04 2014 00:54 justanothertownie wrote:Show nested quote +On April 04 2014 00:52 raynpelikoneet wrote:On April 04 2014 00:51 justanothertownie wrote:On April 04 2014 00:50 raynpelikoneet wrote:
EBWOP: ..or does it make sense or not. That was not where i was commenting on because i don't think he was on the same page with you. But he DID explain himself, that's what i was saying, not that he made sense.. My point was that he wasn't explaining what I just asked you. Whatever, I will drop it for now and see what he does next. Well maybe you are on page 1 he is on page 2 and i am on page 3. idk. Anyways if you have a problem with him ask him. lynch austin? i have a really good case on him. Your case didn't really convince me to be honest. But I expect more from town austin than what he did this game.
What's wrong in my case?
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On April 03 2014 09:51 yamato77 wrote:
Dandel's post makes me want to kill him, too.
Rayn's reads are shitty because there's no reason to go "YEP HE'S TOWN" 5 minutes into the game unless you're mafia trying to make friends.
On April 03 2014 11:57 yamato77 wrote:Show nested quote +On April 03 2014 11:37 gumshoe wrote:I dont like how theres not a single real scum read in dandel ions whole thing / : it's all just policy lynch suggestions and uncalled for slander. Why put such a huge effort into something so pointless? You know, unless hes hoping scum impale themselves on the branches of his not for reals tree... Maybe hes deliberately playing into our idea of Dandel Ion? It definitly doesnt look like hes scum hunting. In fact he even confirms that the primary goal of his posting tonight was to get a green check from town . I'm already confirmed town anyway so my job here is done. Does that not seem iffy? for the record, this is about what one expects from Dandel anyway not that interested in him
On April 03 2014 12:07 yamato77 wrote:Show nested quote +On April 03 2014 12:02 Oatsmaster wrote:On April 03 2014 12:01 yamato77 wrote:On April 03 2014 11:58 Oatsmaster wrote:
Also robik rage voting dandel and then voting for iamp unexplained also feels bad, not noob bad but scum bad.
Like hes faking the rage against dandel right so he votes for him, then he feels like maybe he can get more support for an iamp lynch and is just testing the waters with his vote. Townies always have a reason for voting someone and its so early in the game it cant really be a trap or anything. Robik you gotta explain yourself.
that seems like a reach why? Do you really think a mafia player thinks he can get a lynch on iamp going with a vote at that time? It's a serious reach to suggest so. Show nested quote +On April 03 2014 12:02 gumshoe wrote:On April 03 2014 11:57 yamato77 wrote:On April 03 2014 11:37 gumshoe wrote:I dont like how theres not a single real scum read in dandel ions whole thing / : it's all just policy lynch suggestions and uncalled for slander. Why put such a huge effort into something so pointless? You know, unless hes hoping scum impale themselves on the branches of his not for reals tree... Maybe hes deliberately playing into our idea of Dandel Ion? It definitly doesnt look like hes scum hunting. In fact he even confirms that the primary goal of his posting tonight was to get a green check from town . I'm already confirmed town anyway so my job here is done. Does that not seem iffy? for the record, this is about what one expects from Dandel anyway not that interested in him Do you think he's incapable of playing into his own meta? What has he contributed so far in comparison to how much effort it looks like he's spent? Why do you think Rayn is scum? I don't care about Dandel atm whatsoever. I have my reasons for pursuing the Rayn read.
Let's kill yamato. He wants to kill dandel and then says he won't talk to dandel if robik is around and then wants nothing to do with dandel. All while doing nothing other than some secret plan with rayn.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
