Ask tehpoofter's and he will tell that his check says not-town rather than mafia. Why would I possibly claim tracking a claimed third party to a kill as mafia?

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

April 06 2014 22:09 GMT

#3363

I can check one person every night and he kindly claimed a third party

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

April 06 2014 22:17 GMT

#3370

I PMed you because that's how someone who had actually tracked you would have acted.

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

April 06 2014 22:54 GMT

#3377

Good night,

##nuke Tehpoofter

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

April 07 2014 08:12 GMT

#3434

For the record, I'm mafia and would appreciate if all third parties would contact me.

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

April 22 2014 04:33 GMT

#6134

I wish we had shot JAT for not contacting us on day 2, he seemed a bit confused about his win con. The only third party who even remotely played like one was Amiko, although a bit disappointed by him/her attempting to help town in the end.

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

April 22 2014 04:51 GMT

#6136

I had just nuked a cop who claimed not-town check on me and claimed mafia in the thread, I can assure you if I'm ever a townie trying to trap a traitor that I couldn't possibly even know existed, my plans would't be that elaborate.

To be fair, I should have pushed you more since you were clearly hinting at it

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

April 22 2014 07:00 GMT

#6137

So Foolishness, SnB, Paper and WoS (the ring) protected Sandro on 1, I've to say we were quite perplexed by the fact everyone thought he was town.

FOUR N1 protections on a single mafia

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

April 22 2014 07:32 GMT

#6140

On April 22 2014 16:27 justanothertownie wrote:

Show nested quote +

Yeah, wouldn't that have been a great idea?! Hey dude, I am 3P and my wincon is to shoot your scumbuddy so let's cooperate! Also I thought I would have won by the end of day2 so why bother.
Not my fault that apart from sandroba scummers were scumming hardcore.

Show nested quote +

Must have been someone else who was CONVINCED the game was lost in the obs qt. ^_^

You almost certainly thought Sandro was town on day 2 and cooperating with mafia to kill him was the natural thing to do.

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

April 22 2014 07:40 GMT

#6150

It's a shame we didn't know which of you was delivering the KP, we roleblocked Austin instead of Koshi

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

April 22 2014 07:44 GMT

#6154

So another reason for Sandro to be considered confirmed town, too bad we had to kill people who were in the town circle due to them being confirmed town due to their roles (I strongly dislike this by the way) or their play

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

April 22 2014 07:51 GMT

#6157

On April 22 2014 16:49 Koshi wrote:

Show nested quote +

Yeah but that's a big one. Should have saved LSB. Dat role was so strong.

I know he said he almost RBed you instead, but I gues he wasn't paying enough attention to what you were doing to realize that you had revealed that you would be delivering the kp.

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

April 22 2014 12:40 GMT

#6168

I had a red check on me, Oats claimed mafia, VE claimed mafia

I give you credit for Iamp and LSB

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

April 22 2014 12:42 GMT

#6170

On April 22 2014 21:41 Holyflare wrote:

Show nested quote +

List was made far before any of them claimed mafia.

It was a game of clearing people based on claims, roles and activity

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

April 22 2014 12:47 GMT

#6174

On April 22 2014 21:43 Holyflare wrote:

Show nested quote +

So like every game of mafia then.

Most themed games yes, I do that too, but I think hosts should give the subject more serious thought. Hopeless, Palmar, you, koshi, WoS and some others were essentially innocent children due to their roles and someone like JAT could almost never be mafia because his claim was too perfect (there really were insane people).

The game was very light on analysis after day 1.

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

April 22 2014 13:45 GMT

#6202

There were a ton of confirmed townies to kill and your protections weren't an issue since you had to claim them. We tried to kill you on the night with no kills, but, I assume, Geript RBing Oats blocked both of our shots. Oats was supposed to RB you and shoot someone else while Sandro was supposed to shoot you.

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

April 22 2014 14:59 GMT

#6213

Allowing JAT to RB+shoot Sandro was a pretty terrible idea considering it would have led to town loss had Sandro been town and if mafia had more than 1 kp (which they did) or more than 1 member left.

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

April 22 2014 15:13 GMT

#6215

We considered having Oats kill WoS on the night he was supposed to use the invention. That, too, would have likely won us the game, but at the time it seemed a bit too brazen to have both inventions simultaneously go missing.

Prev 1 2 3 4 Next All

Please or register to reply.

Live Events Refresh