|
This Thread needs more Koshi!
|
On April 03 2014 23:53 Holyflare wrote:Show nested quote +On April 03 2014 23:52 marvellosity wrote:On April 03 2014 23:52 Holyflare wrote:
And they aren't insults it's construtive. You keep targeting people in this game to come to no conclusion whatsoever. What's the point of that? do you seriously think Robik is mafia?? No i actually think you are though
Then you should probably question marv and not robik, hm?
|
On April 04 2014 00:09 IAmRobik wrote:Show nested quote +On April 04 2014 00:08 strongandbig wrote:On April 04 2014 00:04 raynpelikoneet wrote:On April 04 2014 00:02 strongandbig wrote:On April 03 2014 23:43 Oatsmaster wrote:On April 03 2014 23:23 Keirathi wrote:
Anyways, for the record, I'm not really interested in lynching Balla right this minute. Mostly because everything he's done has fit with his pre-game "roll".
Random lynch = 100% neutral. He rolled true neutral.
I don't think it was constructive and the whole bit was dumb, but I just see it as more of him having fun with his roll than being scum.
Totes okay with waiting until he says more.
Nah i totally disagree with this. What better way to play as scum saying "i said I would do this pregame". I feel like townBalla would have more responsibilty as town than to play like this. so your read on balla is a meta-read based on the fact that you think he would roleplay as scum and not as town? can you give me some evidence or reasoning to back up this meta read? i have never played with balla before. other than this metaread i dont see anything in balla's filter that looks actively scummy rather than just not playing the game, and it's early enough in the day that we don't have to start worrying about that yet Balla's meta is that he plays as town. If he is mafia he either does not play or if he tries he gets caught. if it didnt come across in my sandrojism comment i dont like people like that syllo is playing for real so far this game though so i should stop needling him. my b anyway i still don't think killing is town. who's with me? Killing is DEFINITELY town. If you think otherwise, go read Foundations.
Wut? He was scum that game and hasn't played a town forum game afaik. Bad approach to meta him like that.
On April 04 2014 00:08 strongandbig wrote:Show nested quote +On April 04 2014 00:04 raynpelikoneet wrote:On April 04 2014 00:02 strongandbig wrote:On April 03 2014 23:43 Oatsmaster wrote:On April 03 2014 23:23 Keirathi wrote:
Anyways, for the record, I'm not really interested in lynching Balla right this minute. Mostly because everything he's done has fit with his pre-game "roll".
Random lynch = 100% neutral. He rolled true neutral.
I don't think it was constructive and the whole bit was dumb, but I just see it as more of him having fun with his roll than being scum.
Totes okay with waiting until he says more.
Nah i totally disagree with this. What better way to play as scum saying "i said I would do this pregame". I feel like townBalla would have more responsibilty as town than to play like this. so your read on balla is a meta-read based on the fact that you think he would roleplay as scum and not as town? can you give me some evidence or reasoning to back up this meta read? i have never played with balla before. other than this metaread i dont see anything in balla's filter that looks actively scummy rather than just not playing the game, and it's early enough in the day that we don't have to start worrying about that yet Balla's meta is that he plays as town. If he is mafia he either does not play or if he tries he gets caught. if it didnt come across in my sandrojism comment i dont like people like that syllo is playing for real so far this game though so i should stop needling him. my b anyway i still don't think killing is town. who's with me?
You have my axe.
|
On April 04 2014 00:17 marvellosity wrote:Show nested quote +On April 04 2014 00:16 justanothertownie wrote:On April 04 2014 00:09 IAmRobik wrote:On April 04 2014 00:08 strongandbig wrote:On April 04 2014 00:04 raynpelikoneet wrote:On April 04 2014 00:02 strongandbig wrote:On April 03 2014 23:43 Oatsmaster wrote:On April 03 2014 23:23 Keirathi wrote:
Anyways, for the record, I'm not really interested in lynching Balla right this minute. Mostly because everything he's done has fit with his pre-game "roll".
Random lynch = 100% neutral. He rolled true neutral.
I don't think it was constructive and the whole bit was dumb, but I just see it as more of him having fun with his roll than being scum.
Totes okay with waiting until he says more.
Nah i totally disagree with this. What better way to play as scum saying "i said I would do this pregame". I feel like townBalla would have more responsibilty as town than to play like this. so your read on balla is a meta-read based on the fact that you think he would roleplay as scum and not as town? can you give me some evidence or reasoning to back up this meta read? i have never played with balla before. other than this metaread i dont see anything in balla's filter that looks actively scummy rather than just not playing the game, and it's early enough in the day that we don't have to start worrying about that yet Balla's meta is that he plays as town. If he is mafia he either does not play or if he tries he gets caught. if it didnt come across in my sandrojism comment i dont like people like that syllo is playing for real so far this game though so i should stop needling him. my b anyway i still don't think killing is town. who's with me? Killing is DEFINITELY town. If you think otherwise, go read Foundations. Wut? He was scum that game and hasn't played a town forum game afaik. Bad approach to meta him like that. On April 04 2014 00:08 strongandbig wrote:On April 04 2014 00:04 raynpelikoneet wrote:On April 04 2014 00:02 strongandbig wrote:On April 03 2014 23:43 Oatsmaster wrote:On April 03 2014 23:23 Keirathi wrote:
Anyways, for the record, I'm not really interested in lynching Balla right this minute. Mostly because everything he's done has fit with his pre-game "roll".
Random lynch = 100% neutral. He rolled true neutral.
I don't think it was constructive and the whole bit was dumb, but I just see it as more of him having fun with his roll than being scum.
Totes okay with waiting until he says more.
Nah i totally disagree with this. What better way to play as scum saying "i said I would do this pregame". I feel like townBalla would have more responsibilty as town than to play like this. so your read on balla is a meta-read based on the fact that you think he would roleplay as scum and not as town? can you give me some evidence or reasoning to back up this meta read? i have never played with balla before. other than this metaread i dont see anything in balla's filter that looks actively scummy rather than just not playing the game, and it's early enough in the day that we don't have to start worrying about that yet Balla's meta is that he plays as town. If he is mafia he either does not play or if he tries he gets caught. if it didnt come across in my sandrojism comment i dont like people like that syllo is playing for real so far this game though so i should stop needling him. my b anyway i still don't think killing is town. who's with me? You have my axe. It's precisely the reason I have him marked as light town as well, actually
Well that's funny because Robik didn't even give an explicit reason.
|
On April 04 2014 00:21 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On April 04 2014 00:20 Keirathi wrote:
I liked Killing's first few posts. They were carefree and fun loving.
Then he went all weird and nonsensical when he was questioning jat.
Idgi He thought he found something and got caught in the moment of distraction. Pretty obvious.
He couldn't even explain whatever it was he was thinking...
|
On April 04 2014 00:25 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On April 04 2014 00:24 justanothertownie wrote:On April 04 2014 00:21 raynpelikoneet wrote:On April 04 2014 00:20 Keirathi wrote:
I liked Killing's first few posts. They were carefree and fun loving.
Then he went all weird and nonsensical when he was questioning jat.
Idgi He thought he found something and got caught in the moment of distraction. Pretty obvious. He couldn't even explain whatever it was he was thinking... That's not true.
Ok. Tell me.
|
On April 04 2014 00:34 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On April 04 2014 00:26 justanothertownie wrote:On April 04 2014 00:25 raynpelikoneet wrote:On April 04 2014 00:24 justanothertownie wrote:On April 04 2014 00:21 raynpelikoneet wrote:On April 04 2014 00:20 Keirathi wrote:
I liked Killing's first few posts. They were carefree and fun loving.
Then he went all weird and nonsensical when he was questioning jat.
Idgi He thought he found something and got caught in the moment of distraction. Pretty obvious. He couldn't even explain whatever it was he was thinking... That's not true. Ok. Tell me. Just because he is wrong / you think he is stupid and/or saying bad doesn't mean he didn't explain himself because he quite clearly did.
Well, what did he say then rayn? You seem to know.
|
On April 04 2014 00:41 Dandel Ion wrote:
at this point in time i should add
Maybe your radar is off. Or it is because people don't townread me that early most of the time. Foundation was an exception there.
|
On April 04 2014 00:44 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On April 04 2014 00:39 justanothertownie wrote:On April 04 2014 00:34 raynpelikoneet wrote:On April 04 2014 00:26 justanothertownie wrote:On April 04 2014 00:25 raynpelikoneet wrote:On April 04 2014 00:24 justanothertownie wrote:On April 04 2014 00:21 raynpelikoneet wrote:On April 04 2014 00:20 Keirathi wrote:
I liked Killing's first few posts. They were carefree and fun loving.
Then he went all weird and nonsensical when he was questioning jat.
Idgi He thought he found something and got caught in the moment of distraction. Pretty obvious. He couldn't even explain whatever it was he was thinking... That's not true. Ok. Tell me. Just because he is wrong / you think he is stupid and/or saying bad doesn't mean he didn't explain himself because he quite clearly did. Well, what did he say then rayn? You seem to know. He said you caring about the reasoning on one read but not the other is weird. Then he said you might be scum for it because you could be waiting for someone to give a read that might end up being wrong in the end if they flip scum, you might want to pidgeon hole them into a read that you hope will make them look scummy. You're still my top scum read because of the amount of fluff and the feigning participation you've done. I think that's a pretty clear explanation to what he thinks.
If I want to read what he said I can look that up myself. The point is that it makes no sense. I don't see the connection between asking for one read and the baiting part - I don't understand it at all and no, he didn't explain it. Am I being dumb here?
|
On April 04 2014 00:50 raynpelikoneet wrote:
EBWOP: ..or does it make sense or not. That was not where i was commenting on because i don't think he was on the same page with you. But he DID explain himself, that's what i was saying, not that he made sense..
My point was that he wasn't explaining what I just asked you. Whatever, I will drop it for now and see what he does next.
|
On April 04 2014 00:52 Dandel Ion wrote:
from my experience, what you should be looking for is whether he does something next or not
Really?
|
On April 04 2014 00:52 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On April 04 2014 00:51 justanothertownie wrote:On April 04 2014 00:50 raynpelikoneet wrote:
EBWOP: ..or does it make sense or not. That was not where i was commenting on because i don't think he was on the same page with you. But he DID explain himself, that's what i was saying, not that he made sense.. My point was that he wasn't explaining what I just asked you. Whatever, I will drop it for now and see what he does next. Well maybe you are on page 1 he is on page 2 and i am on page 3. idk. Anyways if you have a problem with him ask him. lynch austin? i have a really good case on him.
Your case didn't really convince me to be honest. But I expect more from town austin than what he did this game.
|
On April 04 2014 01:03 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On April 04 2014 00:54 justanothertownie wrote:On April 04 2014 00:52 raynpelikoneet wrote:On April 04 2014 00:51 justanothertownie wrote:On April 04 2014 00:50 raynpelikoneet wrote:
EBWOP: ..or does it make sense or not. That was not where i was commenting on because i don't think he was on the same page with you. But he DID explain himself, that's what i was saying, not that he made sense.. My point was that he wasn't explaining what I just asked you. Whatever, I will drop it for now and see what he does next. Well maybe you are on page 1 he is on page 2 and i am on page 3. idk. Anyways if you have a problem with him ask him. lynch austin? i have a really good case on him. Your case didn't really convince me to be honest. But I expect more from town austin than what he did this game. What's wrong in my case?
You point out inconsistencies/a weak read but I don't see how they have to come from mafia necessarily.
|
On April 04 2014 01:13 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On April 04 2014 01:09 justanothertownie wrote:On April 04 2014 01:03 raynpelikoneet wrote:On April 04 2014 00:54 justanothertownie wrote:On April 04 2014 00:52 raynpelikoneet wrote:On April 04 2014 00:51 justanothertownie wrote:On April 04 2014 00:50 raynpelikoneet wrote:
EBWOP: ..or does it make sense or not. That was not where i was commenting on because i don't think he was on the same page with you. But he DID explain himself, that's what i was saying, not that he made sense.. My point was that he wasn't explaining what I just asked you. Whatever, I will drop it for now and see what he does next. Well maybe you are on page 1 he is on page 2 and i am on page 3. idk. Anyways if you have a problem with him ask him. lynch austin? i have a really good case on him. Your case didn't really convince me to be honest. But I expect more from town austin than what he did this game. What's wrong in my case? You point out inconsistencies/a weak read but I don't see how they have to come from mafia necessarily. I pointed out behavior that shows austin is giving his thoughts on something he doesn't even think through properly. That is scummy. Not necessarily enough to make him 100% mafia but him showing this exact same behavior in his last mafia game points even more towards him being mafia.
In his last mafia game he was really obvious. I don't see that yet - he needs to post more before I am able to read him.
|
On April 04 2014 01:21 marvellosity wrote:
rayn is pretty town.
Agreed.
|
On April 04 2014 01:30 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On April 04 2014 01:28 justanothertownie wrote:On April 04 2014 01:21 marvellosity wrote:
rayn is pretty town. Agreed. You shouldn't have said this Plammer is gonna put you into scumpile. 
Oh shit. Do I get lynched now? 
|
On April 04 2014 01:36 Keirathi wrote:Show nested quote +On April 04 2014 01:33 Palmar wrote:On April 04 2014 01:32 raynpelikoneet wrote:On April 04 2014 01:32 IAmRobik wrote:On April 04 2014 01:28 GreYMisT wrote:
Balla24 is being replaced. This will happen in the next few hours. We should just lynch the person who replaced balla. Balla clearly wanted out because he didn't want to be scum and made up some bullshit reasoning to GreYMisT (kidding, but not really) Maybe he was drown in the shower. Or maybe he was drive over by a car? I don't love it when you do it. Faker!
Instant scumpile.
|
On April 04 2014 01:37 Palmar wrote:Show nested quote +On April 04 2014 01:36 Keirathi wrote:On April 04 2014 01:33 Palmar wrote:On April 04 2014 01:32 raynpelikoneet wrote:On April 04 2014 01:32 IAmRobik wrote:On April 04 2014 01:28 GreYMisT wrote:
Balla24 is being replaced. This will happen in the next few hours. We should just lynch the person who replaced balla. Balla clearly wanted out because he didn't want to be scum and made up some bullshit reasoning to GreYMisT (kidding, but not really) Maybe he was drown in the shower. Or maybe he was drive over by a car? I don't love it when you do it. Faker! I am foreigner too. Much to learn in this language. I must pledge myself to my studies. I must not falter, one day I will become like my master... ... OatsMASTER.
Not Kushmasta?
|
On April 04 2014 02:40 Koshi wrote:Show nested quote +On April 04 2014 02:38 raynpelikoneet wrote:On April 04 2014 02:38 Koshi wrote:
can I be totally not interested the first 2 days? I will be superKoshi when the good players are dead. only if you sheep me im totes will smith I am going to make sure my vote is on correct place. I will just be not very active. Living on the edge.
No, I am not a fan.
|
On April 04 2014 04:02 raynpelikoneet wrote:
I told jat and marv, who were following the last game, that in my opinion they should pay more attention to what i say.
Not that it makes you scum austin. my case is what it is.
It is that you comment on things that you have not thought through. You make conclusions based on something you have not read properly. If you post conclusions on somthing i would expect you to think why people say what they do (in this case yamato and me). You are clearly not doing so, but you are STILL posting conclusions.
If you think I am not paying attention to what you are saying then you are just wrong. You aren't always right/what you say doesn't always make sense.
The austin post in question and your case just didn't give me anything. You could be right on marv but I will reserve judgement until he does something.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
