|
On April 03 2014 12:21 Killing wrote:Show nested quote +On April 03 2014 12:19 justanothertownie wrote:On April 03 2014 12:14 Killing wrote:On April 03 2014 12:04 justanothertownie wrote:On April 03 2014 11:58 Killing wrote:On April 03 2014 11:51 justanothertownie wrote:On April 03 2014 11:49 Killing wrote:On April 03 2014 09:55 justanothertownie wrote:On April 03 2014 09:51 yamato77 wrote:
Dandel's post makes me want to kill him, too.
Rayn's reads are shitty because there's no reason to go "YEP HE'S TOWN" 5 minutes into the game unless you're mafia trying to make friends. I disagree. So the actual reads are not the problem here? Can you explain what this means? I don't think there is no reason to post early gut reads. It is much more useful than proposing a random lynch for example. So you think gut reads are better than just saying nothing and random lynching yet you've said nothing? I think everything you've said so far has been incredibly fluffly. You had the smiley read that was incredibly random and then your explanation for why you asked the reasoning for WoS vs Robik was bad as well. You stated that you asked for the reason on the WoS read because robik opened the exact same way. On April 03 2014 09:33 justanothertownie wrote:On April 03 2014 09:27 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Robik your read on Wave is wrong. Troll or serious? Then why do you prod him about it if you get where he's coming from. After that you go into traffic cop mode trying to settle the dispute between DI and Rob. You're my top scumread so far so I'd love to actually hear some content rather than all of this fluff. Seriously dude? You are contradicting yourself in the first part of your post... if I give a random read then that is more than most people here did. Maybe you should explain why my reasoning is bad instead of just throwing shit. I don't even know what you are talking about here. I never said WoS and Robik opened the same way?! You wanted to know the reasoning of the WoS read but never asked for the robik one. I never said that you read them the same way. It seemed that you were curious about the WoS read but then you didn't really care about why he read Rob town. Your only read has been that you liked the smiley thing so I wouldn't agree than "that is more than most people here did". I did ask because I did not follow the WoS read while I thought I understood the robik read. Like I already said. Maybe you should read what I say. I also never said that I like the smiley read I just know that it is a thing for them. Why is it scummy for me to only question one of rayns reads? Explain. You care about the reasoning of one but not the other is weird.
I won't explain it a third time.
So now it is weird? I swear a few minutes ago it was scummy.
|
On April 03 2014 12:23 LSB wrote:Show nested quote +On April 03 2014 12:11 VisceraEyes wrote:
I'm going to say I want to push the button. CATASTROPHE or CATASTROPHE?? Excellent point VE, it is important to establish lexiconically that CATASTROPHE is the official correct way to describe the result of pressing the button. Catashrophe is acceptable as a short hand, as well as "The town initiative for a better tomorrow" For example: We must push the town button so we can cause CATASTROPHE for the betterment of the town.
Anything not button related to say?
|
On April 03 2014 12:27 Killing wrote:Show nested quote +On April 03 2014 12:22 justanothertownie wrote:On April 03 2014 12:21 Killing wrote:On April 03 2014 12:19 justanothertownie wrote:On April 03 2014 12:14 Killing wrote:On April 03 2014 12:04 justanothertownie wrote:On April 03 2014 11:58 Killing wrote:On April 03 2014 11:51 justanothertownie wrote:On April 03 2014 11:49 Killing wrote:On April 03 2014 09:55 justanothertownie wrote:
[quote]
I disagree. So the actual reads are not the problem here? Can you explain what this means? I don't think there is no reason to post early gut reads. It is much more useful than proposing a random lynch for example. So you think gut reads are better than just saying nothing and random lynching yet you've said nothing? I think everything you've said so far has been incredibly fluffly. You had the smiley read that was incredibly random and then your explanation for why you asked the reasoning for WoS vs Robik was bad as well. You stated that you asked for the reason on the WoS read because robik opened the exact same way. On April 03 2014 09:33 justanothertownie wrote:On April 03 2014 09:27 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Robik your read on Wave is wrong. Troll or serious? Then why do you prod him about it if you get where he's coming from. After that you go into traffic cop mode trying to settle the dispute between DI and Rob. You're my top scumread so far so I'd love to actually hear some content rather than all of this fluff. Seriously dude? You are contradicting yourself in the first part of your post... if I give a random read then that is more than most people here did. Maybe you should explain why my reasoning is bad instead of just throwing shit. I don't even know what you are talking about here. I never said WoS and Robik opened the same way?! You wanted to know the reasoning of the WoS read but never asked for the robik one. I never said that you read them the same way. It seemed that you were curious about the WoS read but then you didn't really care about why he read Rob town. Your only read has been that you liked the smiley thing so I wouldn't agree than "that is more than most people here did". I did ask because I did not follow the WoS read while I thought I understood the robik read. Like I already said. Maybe you should read what I say. I also never said that I like the smiley read I just know that it is a thing for them. Why is it scummy for me to only question one of rayns reads? Explain. You care about the reasoning of one but not the other is weird. I won't explain it a third time. So now it is weird? I swear a few minutes ago it was scummy. There's a few possible scenarios if you're scum. You could be waiting for someone to give a read that might end up being wrong in the end if they flip scum, you might want to pidgeon hole them into a read that you hope will make them look scummy. You're still my top scum read because of the amount of fluff and the feigning participation you've done.
|
Sorry didn't mean to hit post there...
Maybe it's because it is really late and I am tired but I don't understand what you are saying at all. You think I ask for only one read to bait someone else into giving a wrong read on what exactly? Seems pretty stupid to me.
|
On April 03 2014 12:31 Killing wrote:Show nested quote +On April 03 2014 12:30 justanothertownie wrote:
Sorry didn't mean to hit post there...
Maybe it's because it is really late and I am tired but I don't understand what you are saying at all. You think I ask for only one read to bait someone else into giving a wrong read on what exactly? Seems pretty stupid to me. I don't think it's stupid at all. I do that shit all the time. If you're town, you should move on and play townie because that's the only thing that will change my mind tbh.
If you think that I am responding to this because I want to convince you about my alignment then you are mistaken friend. I want to know how you try to justify this bullshit to read YOU.
|
Like, please explain to me exactly how this scenario you invented works because I honestly don't understand what you are saying joey.
|
On April 03 2014 12:38 Killing wrote:Show nested quote +On April 03 2014 12:37 justanothertownie wrote:
Like, please explain to me exactly how this scenario you invented works because I honestly don't understand what you are saying joey. Dude, you called my reasoning stupid and I really could give a shit if you think it's stupid. I'm not interested in arguing over it at this point.
Neither am I but as long as you can't explain it to me I think you are just trying to throw shit on me.
|
On April 03 2014 12:47 Keirathi wrote:
It seems like Killing's basic argument boils down to something like this:
*Teacher puts 2 math problems on the board*
Guy 1: "Can you explain that first one again? I don't get it."
Teacher: "Okay, here you go!"
Guy 1: "Thanks, I got it now."
...................
Guy 2: "Wait, why didn't you ask for the explanation to both the problems? WHAT IS GOING ON WHY ARE YOU FAKING IT?"
Guy 1: "Because I only didn't understand the first one."
Guy 2: "DIE SCUM LIAR".
Ok, but Guy 2 is a tool then.
|
On April 03 2014 12:51 VisceraEyes wrote:Show nested quote +On April 03 2014 12:50 justanothertownie wrote:On April 03 2014 12:47 Keirathi wrote:
It seems like Killing's basic argument boils down to something like this:
*Teacher puts 2 math problems on the board*
Guy 1: "Can you explain that first one again? I don't get it."
Teacher: "Okay, here you go!"
Guy 1: "Thanks, I got it now."
...................
Guy 2: "Wait, why didn't you ask for the explanation to both the problems? WHAT IS GOING ON WHY ARE YOU FAKING IT?"
Guy 1: "Because I only didn't understand the first one."
Guy 2: "DIE SCUM LIAR". Ok, but Guy 2 is a tool then. He's not a tool he's just spirited! Don't be rude.
The problem is if Guy 2 is not a tool then he should be able to explain why Guy 1 is a scum liar for what he did instead of yelling.
|
On April 03 2014 12:53 raynpelikoneet wrote:
But how does the situation differ if the teacher put the problem on a table instead?
Now you are being silly. 
|
On April 03 2014 20:31 Koshi wrote:
I am currently on page 16 and there is a giant cat holding a taxi. I will be looking at that picture for the next 5 hours. Then I will be able to read the thread.
Don't ever change.
|
On April 03 2014 20:25 Holyflare wrote:Let's win then! Tell me what the most fun tl game mechanic was!
How does that help win the game?
|
On April 03 2014 21:36 Holyflare wrote:Show nested quote +On April 03 2014 21:33 justanothertownie wrote:On April 03 2014 20:25 Holyflare wrote:On April 03 2014 20:24 Palmar wrote:
Holy, we're the bosses of this town. Let's win then! Tell me what the most fun tl game mechanic was! How does that help win the game? What is the most fun tl mafia game mechanic jat?
What's the deal?
I probably missed the really fun mechanics because I never played in the heavily themed games besides hogwarts.
|
On April 03 2014 21:44 raynpelikoneet wrote:
I dunno. I don't think Robert is mafia. marv will be clearer read laterz.
But austin.. man dat red star!
Ok, that's the third time you mention it. Could you show the post you are talking about and explain?
|
On April 03 2014 21:45 Palmar wrote:Show nested quote +On April 03 2014 21:44 IAmRobik wrote:On April 03 2014 21:40 Palmar wrote:
rayn marv and robik basically confirmed mafia. let's kill them. you forgot your VE read Palmar doesn't forget, palmar intentionally leaves out.
What does Palmar think about rayn then? He defended scumbrik and scumarv, you know.
|
On April 03 2014 21:57 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On April 03 2014 21:50 justanothertownie wrote:On April 03 2014 21:45 Palmar wrote:On April 03 2014 21:44 IAmRobik wrote:On April 03 2014 21:40 Palmar wrote:
rayn marv and robik basically confirmed mafia. let's kill them. you forgot your VE read Palmar doesn't forget, palmar intentionally leaves out. What does Palmar think about rayn then? He defended scumbrik and scumarv, you know. Could you point out where did i defend marv?
You postponed your read on him. I was mainly joking - didn't expect Palmar to give useful answer tbh,
|
On April 03 2014 22:02 marvellosity wrote:Show nested quote +On April 03 2014 21:56 raynpelikoneet wrote:On April 03 2014 14:23 austinmcc wrote:Hello, friends! I believe you'll find that I am currently Quetzacoatl, Bird God of Lightning and Other Things I Decide to be God Over. You can find my credentials elsewhere. yamato's bit on rayn not making townreads 5 minutes in reads like yamato town, silly thing to say if scum, and not in a good-silly way. Carefree comment, nonsense read based on nonsense reads, town. Especially since rayn thinks/thought that yamato might be mafia for being serious, yamato super town.keirathi hello! + Show Spoiler +On April 03 2014 10:11 Keirathi wrote:Show nested quote +On April 03 2014 10:09 iamperfection wrote:On April 03 2014 10:06 raynpelikoneet wrote:
iamp i don't really think townreading people because of their reaction to obvious joke post was as easy comment is legit. Uh ok. I use it a ton and I don't really get burned by it. Not really worried about it anyway as Yamato is super easy to read. But lets not try and give iamp advice he kind of knows what he is doing. But do you know how to bake a pretty cake? I believe it's a piece of cake, if the way is hazy. I was once told that I had to "do the cooking by the book" and also ordered to "break it down bitch ... drop dat ass down low then pick that muthafucka up" gumshoe remarkably overzealous. everything else when skimmed does nothing for me or my pee-pee. red part: nono. yamato would try to read me as town but he would also "try to read me" as scum. either a lie or a very lazy comment green part: another good one, or rather.. bad one. yamato's read or "read" is not nonsense. my reads are definitely not nonsense because i already said i am srs. so austin are you calling me a liar? or are you making the same lazy "didn't read properly, didn't think for a second and i admit it, but anyways i am taking a stance" opening post you made in last game? blue part: how does me thinking yamato is serious make yamato more town? this makes no sense. best lynch 2014. I noticed this too and found it pretty strange. But I don't see why it's mafia-strange. austin is prone to making really stupid reads based on nothing (sorry my love). And of all the things to give a townread for, that one seems particularly stupid. So stupid in fact that making it as mafia seems far-fetched, because surely it's going to get you flak. So while I can agree that the paragraph is poo-poo, you'll have to tell me exactly why it's red poo-poo.
So you are leaning towards the brainz explanation I take it.
|
On April 03 2014 22:05 Palmar wrote:Show nested quote +On April 03 2014 22:01 justanothertownie wrote:On April 03 2014 21:57 raynpelikoneet wrote:On April 03 2014 21:50 justanothertownie wrote:On April 03 2014 21:45 Palmar wrote:On April 03 2014 21:44 IAmRobik wrote:On April 03 2014 21:40 Palmar wrote:
rayn marv and robik basically confirmed mafia. let's kill them. you forgot your VE read Palmar doesn't forget, palmar intentionally leaves out. What does Palmar think about rayn then? He defended scumbrik and scumarv, you know. Could you point out where did i defend marv? You postponed your read on him. I was mainly joking - didn't expect Palmar to give useful answer tbh, Why not I am helpful!
Based town hero!
|
On April 03 2014 22:16 Palmar wrote:
Townies who are also good at this game:
snb
hf
palmar
iamp
wos
scraps
Jesters:
rayn
Scum:
marv
ve
robik
Robik - bussing like a mofo.
|
On April 03 2014 23:24 marvellosity wrote:Show nested quote +On April 03 2014 23:23 iamperfection wrote:
But since your here balla anything to say? if your mafia don't post accept your fate of course. NO. I am *so* bored of mafia rolling over.
And still you complain if I say your games have been boring to observe.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
