|
On March 25 2014 06:29 Hopeless1der wrote:
it's currently 6v2 but you could also consider it 4v4 "confirmed" vs non confirmed and we have first lynch. (Town are rayn koshi palmar me)
and like hell there's a doc rayn, you should have figured that out.
I am pretty sure there is because the setup was 11-4 (which is a bit scum favored) and mafia had all 3 roles.
|
First Titanic mafia had doctor too and the same setup.
|
On March 25 2014 06:30 raynpelikoneet wrote:
no it's 7-2
oh yeah slam derp
On March 25 2014 06:33 raynpelikoneet wrote:
First Titanic mafia had doctor too and the same setup.
well i'll shut my pretty mouth then.
|
yeah, we kill 1 today, 1 tonight, 1 tomorrow (and lose 1 townie for it)
That leaves 5 people alive. so we get the 4th kill, which is lylo if we somehow haven't hit mafia before that, otherwise we get another lynch the day after that
assuming hopeless's claim is true we have slam/rayn/hopeless/koshi clear, one of them will die tonight. that's 3 confirmed townies even in case in the 5 man possible lylo, so it cannot be a lylo, and even then we have 2 confirmed people in the 3 man lylo that follows because scum can only kill 2 out the 4 confirmed.
|
so this is basically gg.
No need for doc to claim today.
|
I have no opinion on the order we kill ve/oats/dp/poof in.
|
I volunteer as tribute so people shut up about me.
|
On March 25 2014 06:47 VisceraEyes wrote:
I volunteer as tribute so people shut up about me.
No you don't you stop bitching and start playing.
|
I'm still fine with an Oats lynch. I can't BELIEVE they killed thrawn I was all about a thrawn lynch too, so that leaves like...Poof?
Actually I'll do Poof before Oats. For science!!!
|
And hopeless why in BALLS have you never checked me?! What the eff?
|
On March 25 2014 06:52 VisceraEyes wrote:
And hopeless why in BALLS have you never checked me?! What the eff?
are you kidding me? look at my checks and tell me they're bad.
|
I have no problems with starting with VE
Killing VE is a fun activity for all the family.
|
On March 25 2014 06:33 raynpelikoneet wrote:
First Titanic mafia had doctor too and the same setup.
who was vig in titanic 1?
|
On March 25 2014 06:50 VisceraEyes wrote:
I'm still fine with an Oats lynch. I can't BELIEVE they killed thrawn I was all about a thrawn lynch too, so that leaves like...Poof?
Actually I'll do Poof before Oats. For science!!!
Case kthanksbye.
You can't just say you want to lynch someone without a case.
It's time to start playig VE if you are town.
On March 25 2014 06:53 Hopeless1der wrote:Show nested quote +On March 25 2014 06:52 VisceraEyes wrote:
And hopeless why in BALLS have you never checked me?! What the eff? are you kidding me? look at my checks and tell me they're bad.
Well i think Holyflare check was... not so good. 
but that's just me, for " considering everyone and their reads in the game" it was not a bad check.
|
On March 25 2014 07:00 Hopeless1der wrote:Show nested quote +On March 25 2014 06:33 raynpelikoneet wrote:
First Titanic mafia had doctor too and the same setup. who was vig in titanic 1?
shhhhhh...
|
On March 25 2014 07:01 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On March 25 2014 06:50 VisceraEyes wrote:
I'm still fine with an Oats lynch. I can't BELIEVE they killed thrawn I was all about a thrawn lynch too, so that leaves like...Poof?
Actually I'll do Poof before Oats. For science!!! Case kthanksbye. You can't just say you want to lynch someone without a case. It's time to start playig VE if you are town. Show nested quote +On March 25 2014 06:53 Hopeless1der wrote:On March 25 2014 06:52 VisceraEyes wrote:
And hopeless why in BALLS have you never checked me?! What the eff? are you kidding me? look at my checks and tell me they're bad. Well i think Holyflare check was... not so good. but that's just me, for " considering everyone and their reads in the game" it was not a bad check.
from the point of view that HF was being a sillypants and shitting up the thread with DP it made sense. I'd have checked DP tonight if not for slam.
|
|
|
On March 25 2014 06:39 Palmar wrote:
so this is basically gg.
No need for doc to claim today.
I am interested in this Palmar because if there is a medic CLAIM we win this 100%.
It does not mean they have to be the real medic.
So you might want to elaborate on this statement.
|
if we have a doc they should absolutely 100% claim. That's my opinion anyways.
|
On March 25 2014 07:40 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On March 25 2014 06:39 Palmar wrote:
so this is basically gg.
No need for doc to claim today. I am interested in this Palmar because if there is a medic CLAIM we win this 100%. It does not mean they have to be the real medic. So you might want to elaborate on this statement.
I have no idea
Why would the doc claim? I mean unless he's about to get lynched, but in any case, why not let him take a shot at protecting tonight?
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT![[image loading]](http://i59.tinypic.com/2lbz5fr.png)
