|
On February 21 2014 23:17 marvellosity wrote:Show nested quote +On February 21 2014 23:16 prplhz wrote:On February 21 2014 23:11 marvellosity wrote:On February 21 2014 23:07 prplhz wrote: he was never scum tier material, i just thought he was acting a little odd but i accept that it could just have been a "vote this and lets see what happens" kind of thing, i think he's done that plenty of times before
he seems like he's in a very jolly mood and i think that points at town. i think he likes town more than scum.
also this toad lynch is more yours than his yes I said "his" because you were attacking Palmar and Palmar is championing toad, not because Palmar specifically started the lynch. it wasn't really an attack, it was just a "bah i don't like railroading anyone, not even toad, lets see if something odd is happening that i can prod at" and then palmar did something odd and i pointed it out. maybe he is championing it but i really still consider it your lynch because he's using your arguments. i guess in reality it the arguments' lynch but they're your arguments so it's kind of your lynch. doesn't matter all that much whose lynch it is though i guess. what do you think about oats? is he another "leave him be and we'll figure him out"? yes it's irrelevant, i was explaining why i said his. ergo you said palmar was shady and palmar was championing toad. literally nothing more to it. i have no idea about oats at all. not sure we'll figure him out eventually either.
I suggest the rope+tree investigative method.
100% success rate.
|
On February 21 2014 23:19 marvellosity wrote: problem is you get lynched in that scenario palmar
challenge accepted.
|
On February 21 2014 23:22 marvellosity wrote: I wouldn't even rage though, it'd be no fun. yeah, it needs to be an actual challenge for it to be fun.
|
On February 21 2014 23:31 CuteFluffyPuppy wrote:Show nested quote +On February 21 2014 20:40 marvellosity wrote: ok, just carrying on looking through Smurf's filter. The biggest problem I have at the end of it is that after all his catchup posts he actually has no conclusions about anything, at all.
I have no real idea what Smurf thinks about anything. That's because I didn't really have any scumreads at the end. Strongest suspicion was on Suki. Currently it's on Toad. Too many scummy things, something that happened in Shadow as well yet everyone decided to not lynch him for it. The contradiction and his focus on defending himself, calling you a liar but not scum, all counts in for it. ##Unvote ##Vote Toadesstern
|
On February 21 2014 23:38 suki wrote: Great. You go ahead and sheep your way to victory. I should try that some time instead of wasting all this effort.
I'd be all for you spending time on the game if you were doing something useful with your time.
List of not useful things: Calling me scum.
|
On February 21 2014 23:43 CuteFluffyPuppy wrote:Show nested quote +On February 21 2014 23:38 Palmar wrote:On February 21 2014 23:31 CuteFluffyPuppy wrote:On February 21 2014 20:40 marvellosity wrote: ok, just carrying on looking through Smurf's filter. The biggest problem I have at the end of it is that after all his catchup posts he actually has no conclusions about anything, at all.
I have no real idea what Smurf thinks about anything. That's because I didn't really have any scumreads at the end. Strongest suspicion was on Suki. Currently it's on Toad. Too many scummy things, something that happened in Shadow as well yet everyone decided to not lynch him for it. The contradiction and his focus on defending himself, calling you a liar but not scum, all counts in for it. ##Unvote ##Vote Toadesstern I thought suki and Toad were suspicious, but I didn't have a strong inclination at the time which was why my vote was on myself. Is that so strange?
can you believe this guy?
|
|
|
That's not why I did the headexplode thing.
|
On February 22 2014 00:03 suki wrote: I don't like oats.
No one likes oats.
|
On February 22 2014 00:08 suki wrote:Show nested quote +On February 22 2014 00:08 Palmar wrote:On February 22 2014 00:03 suki wrote: I don't like oats.
No one likes oats. What's the point in you and marv bringing this up?
You have known me for 50 pages now. Do you not already know better than to keep asking if there is a point to what I do?
|
|
On February 22 2014 00:08 marvellosity wrote: TOO SLOW
I went afk to get some coke, and then I had to actually do work for like 3 minutes.
My bad
|
On February 22 2014 00:11 VIVAX420 wrote: I will quit mafia forever if toad is town I'm holding you to that.
|
On February 22 2014 00:17 prplhz wrote:Show nested quote +On February 22 2014 00:03 suki wrote:I don't like oats. On February 21 2014 11:47 Oatsmaster wrote:On February 21 2014 11:28 Balla24 wrote:On February 21 2014 10:53 Oatsmaster wrote: why do you care suki?
Can you explain the motivation behind this oats? It seems like suki is set on calling rayn town so I dont see why she cares about what rayn has to say about marv considering its almost certaintly gonna be wrong. Oats sees me as scum. Rayn is voting marv and trying to make an association case of me and marv. Why is what rayn says about marv 'almost certainly going to be wrong'? This made sense to me at first because I'm like, 'I'm town, rayn's town pushing scum marv/suki so probably wrong', but if Oats sees me as scum how is rayn's push almost certainly wrong? On February 21 2014 11:23 Oatsmaster wrote: yeah yeah lets lynch palmar gogogogogo vote. On February 21 2014 11:54 Oatsmaster wrote:On February 21 2014 11:18 prplhz wrote:On February 21 2014 11:15 Oatsmaster wrote: why would Palmar do that as scum.
what do i know maybe he doesn't want to push a guy to a lynch who is town or maybe he likes a toad lynch better or whatever make something up don't you think it's weird that palmar is making bad associative reads? I dont think palmar is making 'bad' associative reads, I think that associative reads day 1 are bad but Palmar is perfectly justified for not being sure when like all of his scumreads jump on someone he thinks is scum. Why is he saying lets lynch Palmar gogogo after prplhz me and Balla bring up that Palmar's been odd, and then a few posts later completely defending Palmar. There's no cohesion in his thoughts. the lynch palmar gogogoo was ironic
I don't actually know english, but I think that was sarcastic, not ironic.
|
Maybe, I wouldn't know. Ég er talsvert betri í íslensku en ég er í ensku.
|
On February 22 2014 00:27 VIVAX420 wrote: Omg Palmer you tried to sound smart and you failed
I never try to sound smart.
|
On February 22 2014 00:29 prplhz wrote: i didn't know either so i looked it up on wiktionary which says that irony can be "A statement that, when taken in context, may actually mean something different from, or the opposite of, what is written literally; the use of words expressing something other than their literal intention, often in a humorous context." and the then i thought that the "different from, or the opposite of" part fitted quite well
Yes, I'm reading up on it now and it seems like irony is basically when the result is the opposite of the expected result. Sarcasm is what Oatsmaster did, but it is somewhat of a subset of irony, in the sense that it still relies on a result being opposite of what's expected (he said x, but he meant !x)
|
I said I think with with disclaimer that I don't english.
Í raun ættum við sem erum ekki alin upp við að tala ensku að fá einhvers konar forskot í þessum leik. T.d. væri ég til í að vera með byssu til að skjóta alla þá sem segja heimskulega hluti eða á annan hátt eiga það skilið.
|
On February 22 2014 02:12 Oatsmaster wrote:What do you think of smurf being so super sure that palmar is town? Show nested quote +Accusing Palmar for instance is something I wouldn't expect you to do as scum, and your thought process aligned with plprhz on whom I have a strong townread, which is another point in your favour, so right now I'm leaning town. Like if palmar is scum then this point is totally moot but smurf never mentions palmar at all which is interesting considering his read is so strong.
Good post, I'm impressed.
|
|
|
|