Normal Mini Mafia: Episode I - Page 5

On January 21 2014 07:52 JonnyLaw wrote:
##unvote
##vote kushmasta


I think kush is scum. I think balla is scum. I think kush put a bus vote on balla and got an easy out when I said something. No one else will vote balla. Lynch kush.

On January 22 2014 03:01 JonnyLaw wrote:
Balla I still think you're scum.

You post essentially nothing this game. Then you pop back into the thread and pick a convenient lurker to lynch. You're not making an effort to solve this game.

How is sheeping rayn by saying he's here to move the game forward any type of acceptable play? In the last game you kept commenting oh how you play too nicely and trying to FIND SCUM while I randomly harassed people into talking.

you ask questions, but pose them doubtfully like you're not sure and don't care if they're answered. Your play this game is completely scummy. in 40 hours all you've managed to conclude is that rayn (nine pages of filter) is town and you can sheep him safely while crossfire (one page of filter) looks bad so you can post something without fear of him coming back at you with a defense.

On January 22 2014 03:56 JonnyLaw wrote:
##unvote
[b]##vote zarepath[b]

Yeah, your last post sealed it for me. Your explanation for bum being scummy is that he took his vote off VE when no one would follow his lead. You took your vote off VE when you thought it was an easy thing to do. They're not obviously different at all.




He tried to back up his case for two days and it gained no traction. You abandoned yours after two fucking minutes when VE said lynch me if I'm scum. You literally have one post saying I made a case and that's it. After that it's like total 180 and you jump on the same person VE has his vote on.

On January 22 2014 23:41 suki wrote:
You know what. Fine.

I'm sorry I tried to play the game. I'm just horrible at mafia and should just go away forever.

On January 23 2014 02:41 raynpelikoneet wrote:
VE who else than Jonny? Do you believe in "kush is mafia" theory?

On January 21 2014 02:20 bumatlarge wrote:
Sure balla



In no way is it "entirely false". Suki points out multiple lapses in VE's thought process. You can change your mind, but throwing phrases out like, "that's dumb" or "I'm indifferent" are strong blanket statements to lay down. Clearly VE is either rapidly changing his mind throughout his posts, giving us no indication of where it's going, or he is not thinking his posts through, which he shouldn't be doing as town. I say point out that VE is capable of doing this as town.



Anytime you use the word "imply", it means you are trying to read into something deeper into the post. I do mean I believed Wile, but it was because I thought VE was scummy, and I was appealing to Wile to look at it from his viewpoint if he were town.

Now, if you fail to see that I'm "implying" that I have a scum read on VE here, you wouldn't assume I was suspicious of him in the first place. Rayn did read into it that I thought VE is scum, but rather chooses to view it that I'm tripping over my own reads, which is clearly not what I'm saying, and Rayn knows this.

"I'm just working out what I can remember from VE if he posts like this as town"

Interpretation is key. I clearly mean "I think VE is scum, and the only thing making me reconsider is if he actually posts like this as town." I have played quite a few games with VE, but they were a while ago. All in all, I think Rayn misconstrued what I said here, an possibly purposefully. Townies do do this with analysis, because they want to be right, especially if an ego is present, and interpretation is where alot of analyses hit speed bumps. I do think Rayn is scum here though.

On January 23 2014 03:43 VisceraEyes wrote:

Hey, I don't care if you're the goddamn Batman. And you DO interact with Balla...and at a really strange time and for a really strange reason. The post seems contrived, and it looks like you deliberately mention Balla for some reason.

On January 23 2014 03:50 bumatlarge wrote:


This is so obnoxious, I can't believe you are still doing this. I let you slide because of stupid meta reasons, and you still want to bring up baseless arguments. New material (balla interaction) is fine, and reevaluating older things is even better. But rehashing this stuff does make me mad, and I actually don't want to repeat day 1.

Post a case, I'll defend as best I can, and if don't do it well, I get lynched then oh well.

You realize you are using the fact that I spoilered an analysis. You realize that is a considerate thing to do, no?