TL Mafia LXIV: The Restart - Page 4

On January 27 2014 15:59 Skanjab1s wrote:


I meant to say "untrusting", I wasn't calling anyone untrustworthy, I just used the wrong word.


Are you just trying to hurt me, is that what this is

On January 27 2014 16:18 Alakaslam wrote:
BH what's going on

U make best mayor why u have to tack ve

On January 27 2014 16:21 Mocsta wrote:

Thanks for the <3

One day you will respect me.

On January 27 2014 16:51 Alakaslam wrote:
YOU KNOW WHAT?

## Unvote

##Vote: Alakaslam

You were right, GGTeMpLaR! We need a friggin confirmed townie. If I'm not conftown to you you are closed minded. I am not much benefitted by protection but I am definitely town! I am getting so frustrated not knowing who is scum!

I would lynch the player with the fewest posts, weighed against their contribution in those posts!

On January 26 2014 17:41 Blazinghand wrote:
btw if people want to vote me for mayor that's a-ok by me but ideally i think i'm just gonna figure out someone who's town and better at looking/being useful than I am and vote for them. things I would do as mayor:

A) threaten people with the hammer all the time, because I love abusing power (just ask marv!)
B) use my D1 lynch choice to slap someone in the face with my e-peen. that someone is going to be whoever is posting the least content. Normally this would be me, but since i'm not gonna lynch myself, it's going to be someone else. Right now it's skanjab. note that content =/= number of words. who I lynch will be determined entirely by me for reasons that may seem arbitrary. note, however, that they are not arbitrary simply because I do not share them with you peos.
C) anyone who wants to PM me can.
D) i can't take back the words i never said

Original Message From Blazinghand:
oh yeah. that's totes suspicious. so slam claimed (<veteran>) to me in pms just now, and i'm wondering if perhaps he fell for ggtemp's fishing earlier and ggtemp is trying to get him removed via lynch? the thing is, if that were the case slam would have said so... I think.

On January 27 2014 03:49 Blazinghand wrote:
QuantumPope is probably not scum. He made a worthless fluffly list post, but he provided a little bit of follow-up, and if he is scum, this following reasoning for his post is probably the most chutzpah i've ever seen in a human being:

This is consistent with him posting the post he posted earlier. If he's scum faking this mindset, I will stand corrected, but I don't really see a scum player getting pressure for a list post writing that long posts are bad and then attacking his attacker in this fashion. QP as scum could have easily changed course (especially this early in the day) in response to town pressure. this kind of stubbornness would be sub-optimal for scum.

On January 27 2014 04:05 Blazinghand wrote:


don't bother with giving me towncred for defending QP. just realize that QP is an "easy" lynch, and not because he's scummy, but because his thought process, which seems internally consistent to me, is foreign to other players. He's the kind of guy who can get lynched D1, flip town, and we'll go into D2 basically going "well, that happened" because that's what happens to players like QP. just don't lynch him today, see how it goes. If he's still unreadable in a day, we have more lynches. I look at QP and I see a wagon that is suspiciously easy, if that makes sense.

On January 27 2014 04:02 Blazinghand wrote:
Hm, well I'd say right now I'm not a huge grack fan. he has been opting out of the general discourse of "who should we lynch" and "who should we elect to be mayor" with his farcical mayoral campaign-- it's obvious he's not going to win, and not putting any effort into trying to win. That being said, it's just trolly enough to dismiss as "trolling" without him showing up on people's radars. Barring some extreme lurker still lurking at the end of D1, I'd say Grack is my most solid lynch choice today. He also sent me a PM asking who we should shoot tonight, which I assume was trolling as well. Regardless: he's opting out. probably scum.

On January 26 2014 18:12 Blazinghand wrote:
cause let's be real here there's only one reason to vote for me and one to vote against me

1. vote for me cause i'm freakin awesome and you want more bh in th egame. bh catches scum. bh is terrific. yay
1. you personally don't like bh

but i gotta give all kinds of fake reasons and shit cause that's what people expect. you see, people won't just vote me cause i'm awesome though maybe they should, i have to play the role of someone that people would vote for. this means making bold claims about what to do with my vote, and who i will lynch today. this means making the right kinds of noises so that people have the feeling that they're doing the right thing when they vote for me.

I hosted ET and at least skimmed every post in it, but i don't remember what happened other than that scum won.