EPTResistance 3
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Adam4167
Australia1426 Posts
| ||
|
Adam4167
Australia1426 Posts
On December 24 2013 11:45 FirmTofu wrote: What do you suggest for day 5? I'm curious why the hosts of Resistance 2 did it differently from the Wikipedia reference: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Resistance_(game), which recommends 3,4,4,5,5 for each consecutive day, respectively. hi. That was done to make the game a little easier since the spy team wrecked resistance 1, since everyone was so lost. Read the pre-game chatter in Tunnel rats, lots of confusion about the first game, what they we're meant to be doing ect. | ||
|
Adam4167
Australia1426 Posts
I'll pick a team consisting of people who are actively involved in the game and look town. I'd like to think i'm pretty good at finding townies, and I only need to find two since I'll be including myself in the team. | ||
|
Adam4167
Australia1426 Posts
So which grack am I getting this game? The trolling one from LXIII or the one I remember from Student? | ||
|
Adam4167
Australia1426 Posts
Yes. I found it pretty trolly. Can I expect more of the same here? | ||
|
Adam4167
Australia1426 Posts
On December 27 2013 09:46 Hopeless1der wrote: Hmm..i disagree with rayn about voting usually being anonymous. I guess my friends play with weird rules. I'm used to IRL voting where a choice is selected with a hidden tile and then revealed all at once, then votes are tallied and you know who voted for what and have that as information to analyze. Anyways, do you think there is ever a scenario where the leader SHOULDNT send themselves on a team? Yes, the scenario that springs to mind for me is when the entire town has someone labelled as scum and its their turn to lead, then its in their best interest to remove themselves from the team and send their top 3 townreads, as it'll just be downvoted if they include themselves. Chances are their team is getting downvoted anyway since people aren't going to trust their team, but if they send 3 people I have town reads on, I really don't care who suggests it. | ||
|
Adam4167
Australia1426 Posts
On December 27 2013 10:33 Hopeless1der wrote: Lets suppose at least 1 of those 3 go on to fail a mission. Are you, as leader, culpable in the failure? It should be a consideration, not a slam dunk. But there is at least one spy on the team, that is concrete information. So you look at the leaders motivations for sending each person on the team. | ||
|
Adam4167
Australia1426 Posts
On December 27 2013 15:04 raynpelikoneet wrote: Adam if you needed to decide the team now who'd you pick? If I had to send a team right this second - i'd be sending myself, hopeless and probably yourself. The way hopeless approached the 'leaders voting putting themselves on teams' showed more conviction and confidence than his entire filter in LXIII. While I might not agree with what he was saying, he explained himself well. You seem pretty invested in the game so far, not afraid to attack people and make waves. Your thoughts on what has been discussed up until now seem to mirror my own so that bodes well for you being town. VE, do you intend on doing something other than one-liners this game? | ||
|
Adam4167
Australia1426 Posts
On December 27 2013 18:48 Koshi wrote: Ok, let me ask a simple question so the scummers can look like they are contributing. How does the voting thingie work? 1) Leader proposes team. (Phase 1) 2) All peepz vote yay or nay, majority wins? (Phase 2) 3) if nay we go back to Phase 1 with new leader, if yay we go into nightphase. Am I correct? I believe that to be the case, yes. Majority wins. If not, we go back to phase 1. | ||
|
Adam4167
Australia1426 Posts
Which in itself is probably a tell. Do something useful instead of professing your towniness repeatedly. | ||
|
Adam4167
Australia1426 Posts
He says he wants to send people that are active, so he adds VE to his proposed team, who had a grand total of 5 lines to his filter at that point. He wants to take hopeless out of the team because he might lurk, yet VE is completely fine with 5 lines. He theorizes me and grack are scum, pushing a townie hopeless to take the fall for the mission failure, yet still removes hopeless from his team. I do not like that. I am going to stick to my proposed team of myself, hopeless and rayn. Ill submit it after I have a shower and throw down a fistful of painkillers for this hangover. | ||
|
Adam4167
Australia1426 Posts
On December 28 2013 09:14 raynpelikoneet wrote: also Adam are you here? I'm back. kind of. Feel like trash. Don't know what yall are seeing in VE's filter that'd be worth sending him on a mission. | ||
|
Adam4167
Australia1426 Posts
| ||
|
Adam4167
Australia1426 Posts
On December 28 2013 15:26 raynpelikoneet wrote: So Adam why have you not yay voted your team? Because you touch yourself at night, rayn. -_- | ||
|
Adam4167
Australia1426 Posts
When I went to bed there were 3 yes votes and no one was contesting my team, so what was I to discuss? I'm not going to bark at the people that have voted yes, their votes are in, and they've already done their bit. For everyone else, I was waiting for them to bring their objections to the thread to discuss with them. If they had no objections, there was nothing to discuss and they'd vote yes. The level of resistance this team is facing is what I'd expect from an all town team. I'll almost certainly vote yes, but we've got 4 hours still, may as well use it to discuss. | ||
|
Adam4167
Australia1426 Posts
On December 28 2013 12:04 FirmTofu wrote: I'll assume yay unless you type nay for whatever reason. How do you not read this and assume that I am yay voting my own team? If i had to send a 4th member, sentinel or maybe cora. | ||
|
Adam4167
Australia1426 Posts
On December 29 2013 08:53 Grackaroni wrote: Level of resistance? The team has already passed lol. Only just by the looks of it. 5-4 is all i'd expect from a town team. If it had gone over in a landslide, then I'd know i'd fucked up. | ||
|
Adam4167
Australia1426 Posts
On December 29 2013 08:53 raynpelikoneet wrote: You have already "voted yes" so why the sudden hesitation? I am not hesitant. I said I am almost certainly voting yes. My god. ARE YOU EVEN READING. We have the time, why would we not use it. | ||
|
Adam4167
Australia1426 Posts
On December 29 2013 09:06 [UoN]Sentinel wrote: Why would an all town team have no resistance? Wouldn't it be the other way around, with spies coming in to start something and try and get a different team into play? There hasn't been no resistance. We have 4 people voting no or declaring they're going to vote no. Thats a team passing by the smallest of margins. | ||
|
Adam4167
Australia1426 Posts
Rayn, same question to you | ||
| ||
