|
On December 12 2013 20:42 justanothertownie wrote:
According to MZ at least 4 scum voted for the same person day 2. According to MZ this person is also scum. It was absolutely possible that this scum would have been lynched. Still there were two other wagons on townies.
Makes sense, right?
At least I can back my arguments up with reasons
It stands in stark contrast to your read on me.
|
On December 12 2013 20:43 Meapak_Ziphh wrote:Show nested quote +On December 12 2013 20:38 justanothertownie wrote:On December 12 2013 20:36 Meapak_Ziphh wrote:On December 12 2013 20:33 Koshi wrote:
So it is kinda really strange that both Coag and JL don't swap to austin tbh. I am sad. This is what I was trying to explain to JAT but now he won't talk to me. If you'll notice, LSB is voting roffles as well and he's my other lynch target. Yeah, because you played so many scum games you will tell me now why scum always votes as a collective. No JAT. What I'm trying to tell you is that scum vote for each other because people do what we're doing now and go back and look at flips. It puts in WIFOM and can make other members look better. And if you think that scum have to stay away from voting in groups again you're sorely mistaken. Like, I've seen it happen, it's not that out of the ordinary, especially when there is a bunch of last minute switching. In my experience last minute switches are hard to deal with as scum so better just to park on someone who's not getting lynched and wait it out.
They parked their votes when roffles was a serious candidate.
|
On December 12 2013 20:44 justanothertownie wrote:Show nested quote +On December 12 2013 20:43 Meapak_Ziphh wrote:On December 12 2013 20:38 justanothertownie wrote:On December 12 2013 20:36 Meapak_Ziphh wrote:On December 12 2013 20:33 Koshi wrote:
So it is kinda really strange that both Coag and JL don't swap to austin tbh. I am sad. This is what I was trying to explain to JAT but now he won't talk to me. If you'll notice, LSB is voting roffles as well and he's my other lynch target. Yeah, because you played so many scum games you will tell me now why scum always votes as a collective. No JAT. What I'm trying to tell you is that scum vote for each other because people do what we're doing now and go back and look at flips. It puts in WIFOM and can make other members look better. And if you think that scum have to stay away from voting in groups again you're sorely mistaken. Like, I've seen it happen, it's not that out of the ordinary, especially when there is a bunch of last minute switching. In my experience last minute switches are hard to deal with as scum so better just to park on someone who's not getting lynched and wait it out. They parked their votes when roffles was a serious candidate.
They parked their votes 3 and 4 hours before the end of the day lol.
And in the case of coag, it's pretty clear he was around for that whole time judging by his post right after the flip.
|
On December 12 2013 20:44 Meapak_Ziphh wrote:Show nested quote +On December 12 2013 20:42 justanothertownie wrote:
According to MZ at least 4 scum voted for the same person day 2. According to MZ this person is also scum. It was absolutely possible that this scum would have been lynched. Still there were two other wagons on townies.
Makes sense, right? At least I can back my arguments up with reasons It stands in stark contrast to your read on me.
No, that is something you just don't do at all. You only come to the thread when you are under suspicon and topic of discussion presenting some easy scumreads like gtrsrs LSB and roffles without reasoning besides "they didn't do that much" and yell at people attacking you with bullshit reasoning.
|
EBWOP: I guess it is clear that the bullshit reasoning relates to your defense.
|
|
|
On December 12 2013 20:46 Meapak_Ziphh wrote:Show nested quote +On December 12 2013 20:44 justanothertownie wrote:On December 12 2013 20:43 Meapak_Ziphh wrote:On December 12 2013 20:38 justanothertownie wrote:On December 12 2013 20:36 Meapak_Ziphh wrote:On December 12 2013 20:33 Koshi wrote:
So it is kinda really strange that both Coag and JL don't swap to austin tbh. I am sad. This is what I was trying to explain to JAT but now he won't talk to me. If you'll notice, LSB is voting roffles as well and he's my other lynch target. Yeah, because you played so many scum games you will tell me now why scum always votes as a collective. No JAT. What I'm trying to tell you is that scum vote for each other because people do what we're doing now and go back and look at flips. It puts in WIFOM and can make other members look better. And if you think that scum have to stay away from voting in groups again you're sorely mistaken. Like, I've seen it happen, it's not that out of the ordinary, especially when there is a bunch of last minute switching. In my experience last minute switches are hard to deal with as scum so better just to park on someone who's not getting lynched and wait it out. They parked their votes when roffles was a serious candidate. They parked their votes 3 and 4 hours before the end of the day lol. And in the case of coag, it's pretty clear he was around for that whole time judging by his post right after the flip.
So why did Coag not save MZ? Did he just magically expect geript to do so?
|
On December 12 2013 20:49 Oatsmaster wrote:
As opposed to you JAT?
When was I ever under suspicion in this game?
|
Is the whole scumteam trying to lynch MZ? Lol all in huh
|
On December 12 2013 20:50 justanothertownie wrote:When was I ever under suspicion in this game?
Never.
|
On December 12 2013 20:47 justanothertownie wrote:Show nested quote +On December 12 2013 20:44 Meapak_Ziphh wrote:On December 12 2013 20:42 justanothertownie wrote:
According to MZ at least 4 scum voted for the same person day 2. According to MZ this person is also scum. It was absolutely possible that this scum would have been lynched. Still there were two other wagons on townies.
Makes sense, right? At least I can back my arguments up with reasons It stands in stark contrast to your read on me. No, that is something you just don't do at all. You only come to the thread when you are under suspicon and topic of discussion presenting some easy scumreads like gtrsrs LSB and roffles without reasoning besides "they didn't do that much" and yell at people attacking you with bullshit reasoning.
Bro. I have been under suspicion since early D2. I'm not just gonna ignore the people calling me scum because, as I've constantly said, they don't have case. I will continue to address this for as long as I have to.
I then bring up my reads and guess what, there isn't much for me to add because THEY HAVEN'T FUCKING DONE ANYTHING. Seriously, everything I said D1 about these people still applies. And idk what you mean by easy scumreads. They have acted scummy, I have called them out. Are some people not allowed to be scum anymore because they're too "easy" reads to have? I'm not like ignoring some big huge controversial case out there, this is what we have to work with right now.
This is just getting pathetic.
|
On December 12 2013 20:49 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On December 12 2013 20:46 Meapak_Ziphh wrote:On December 12 2013 20:44 justanothertownie wrote:On December 12 2013 20:43 Meapak_Ziphh wrote:On December 12 2013 20:38 justanothertownie wrote:On December 12 2013 20:36 Meapak_Ziphh wrote:On December 12 2013 20:33 Koshi wrote:
So it is kinda really strange that both Coag and JL don't swap to austin tbh. I am sad. This is what I was trying to explain to JAT but now he won't talk to me. If you'll notice, LSB is voting roffles as well and he's my other lynch target. Yeah, because you played so many scum games you will tell me now why scum always votes as a collective. No JAT. What I'm trying to tell you is that scum vote for each other because people do what we're doing now and go back and look at flips. It puts in WIFOM and can make other members look better. And if you think that scum have to stay away from voting in groups again you're sorely mistaken. Like, I've seen it happen, it's not that out of the ordinary, especially when there is a bunch of last minute switching. In my experience last minute switches are hard to deal with as scum so better just to park on someone who's not getting lynched and wait it out. They parked their votes when roffles was a serious candidate. They parked their votes 3 and 4 hours before the end of the day lol. And in the case of coag, it's pretty clear he was around for that whole time judging by his post right after the flip. So why did Coag not save MZ? Did he just magically expect geript to do so?
Because it would have been exceptionally scummy to do so. Especially for coag because everybody would have seen that he indeed gave a fuck about the lynch.
|
On December 12 2013 20:50 Oatsmaster wrote:Show nested quote +On December 12 2013 20:50 justanothertownie wrote:On December 12 2013 20:49 Oatsmaster wrote:
As opposed to you JAT?
When was I ever under suspicion in this game? Never.
Exactly.
|
On December 12 2013 20:51 Meapak_Ziphh wrote:Show nested quote +On December 12 2013 20:47 justanothertownie wrote:On December 12 2013 20:44 Meapak_Ziphh wrote:On December 12 2013 20:42 justanothertownie wrote:
According to MZ at least 4 scum voted for the same person day 2. According to MZ this person is also scum. It was absolutely possible that this scum would have been lynched. Still there were two other wagons on townies.
Makes sense, right? At least I can back my arguments up with reasons It stands in stark contrast to your read on me. No, that is something you just don't do at all. You only come to the thread when you are under suspicon and topic of discussion presenting some easy scumreads like gtrsrs LSB and roffles without reasoning besides "they didn't do that much" and yell at people attacking you with bullshit reasoning. Bro. I have been under suspicion since early D2. I'm not just gonna ignore the people calling me scum because, as I've constantly said, they don't have case. I will continue to address this for as long as I have to. I then bring up my reads and guess what, there isn't much for me to add because THEY HAVEN'T FUCKING DONE ANYTHING. Seriously, everything I said D1 about these people still applies. And idk what you mean by easy scumreads. They have acted scummy, I have called them out. Are some people not allowed to be scum anymore because they're too "easy" reads to have? I'm not like ignoring some big huge controversial case out there, this is what we have to work with right now. This is just getting pathetic.
It is not forbidden to have scumreads on them but it is not a good sign if people like that are your only scumreads. If the things you said day 1 still apply and nothing changed that means you didn't do any scumhunting since then.
Whatever I will be back in the evening.
|
On December 12 2013 20:54 justanothertownie wrote:Show nested quote +On December 12 2013 20:51 Meapak_Ziphh wrote:On December 12 2013 20:47 justanothertownie wrote:On December 12 2013 20:44 Meapak_Ziphh wrote:On December 12 2013 20:42 justanothertownie wrote:
According to MZ at least 4 scum voted for the same person day 2. According to MZ this person is also scum. It was absolutely possible that this scum would have been lynched. Still there were two other wagons on townies.
Makes sense, right? At least I can back my arguments up with reasons It stands in stark contrast to your read on me. No, that is something you just don't do at all. You only come to the thread when you are under suspicon and topic of discussion presenting some easy scumreads like gtrsrs LSB and roffles without reasoning besides "they didn't do that much" and yell at people attacking you with bullshit reasoning. Bro. I have been under suspicion since early D2. I'm not just gonna ignore the people calling me scum because, as I've constantly said, they don't have case. I will continue to address this for as long as I have to. I then bring up my reads and guess what, there isn't much for me to add because THEY HAVEN'T FUCKING DONE ANYTHING. Seriously, everything I said D1 about these people still applies. And idk what you mean by easy scumreads. They have acted scummy, I have called them out. Are some people not allowed to be scum anymore because they're too "easy" reads to have? I'm not like ignoring some big huge controversial case out there, this is what we have to work with right now. This is just getting pathetic. It is not forbidden to have scumreads on them but it is not a good sign if people like that are your only scumreads. If the things you said day 1 still apply and nothing changed that means you didn't do any scumhunting since then. Whatever I will be back in the evening.
No, it means that the situation hasn't changed since D1. I think these three are scum, that'd make the total number of scum 5 counting the two flipped. How many more do you think there are out there? Not everyone is scum -_-
Btw, do you have any reads other than me? It just occurred to me I haven't seen anything else from you in a really long time.
|
On December 12 2013 20:52 justanothertownie wrote:Show nested quote +On December 12 2013 20:49 raynpelikoneet wrote:On December 12 2013 20:46 Meapak_Ziphh wrote:On December 12 2013 20:44 justanothertownie wrote:On December 12 2013 20:43 Meapak_Ziphh wrote:On December 12 2013 20:38 justanothertownie wrote:On December 12 2013 20:36 Meapak_Ziphh wrote:On December 12 2013 20:33 Koshi wrote:
So it is kinda really strange that both Coag and JL don't swap to austin tbh. I am sad. This is what I was trying to explain to JAT but now he won't talk to me. If you'll notice, LSB is voting roffles as well and he's my other lynch target. Yeah, because you played so many scum games you will tell me now why scum always votes as a collective. No JAT. What I'm trying to tell you is that scum vote for each other because people do what we're doing now and go back and look at flips. It puts in WIFOM and can make other members look better. And if you think that scum have to stay away from voting in groups again you're sorely mistaken. Like, I've seen it happen, it's not that out of the ordinary, especially when there is a bunch of last minute switching. In my experience last minute switches are hard to deal with as scum so better just to park on someone who's not getting lynched and wait it out. They parked their votes when roffles was a serious candidate. They parked their votes 3 and 4 hours before the end of the day lol. And in the case of coag, it's pretty clear he was around for that whole time judging by his post right after the flip. So why did Coag not save MZ? Did he just magically expect geript to do so? Because it would have been exceptionally scummy to do so. Especially for coag because everybody would have seen that he indeed gave a fuck about the lynch.
So your argument is "better just get his scumbuddy lynched". Considering you are talking about voting analysis where you are basing your read on MZ right now his conversation is stupid.
Mafia does not want their own lynched if they can avoid it. There was certainly ways they could have avoided it before last second. They did not do that. So your argument is not valid and you can't use voting analysis to say MZ is scum.
|
rayn, I can't help but feel that you have been defending MZ this entire game. Why exactly?
|
On December 12 2013 21:09 Koshi wrote:
rayn, I can't help but feel that you have been defending MZ this entire game. Why exactly?
Because i do not think he is scum. And the points brought against him are bad, because there are no real points brought against him. And no Koshi, your case was not good.
|
Like i tried to get him copped last night to stop this stupid shit where people just say "but MZ is scum" but people refused to so. I wonder why..
|
Hmm. My case was actually pretty ok. You can say w.e you want but it is pretty good. But it stand or falls with the fact that MZ could be delusional. Which is ofcourse possible.
Is MZ delusional. hmmm.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
