|
##Vote Laughing Jack
I've been saying all game that his posts have no consistency. Totally abonding his scumread on me for what seemed like no reason. Speaking of which:On November 02 2013 04:04 Laughing Jack wrote:
I took a break from the thread and I'll be unexpectedly going to a party tonight, I'll try to find some corner and read up on the thread and vote later tonight. I probably want to lynch into the first three quarters of of the day lurkers, but not 1-posters. OK, this post was after he already said that he didn't want to lynch me anymore. He had already posted his diagram and had said that he wanted to lynch HZ or oats.
So when I read that he's going to a party and will try to find some corner to read and vote, doesn't that sound like there's a chance he wont make it back to the thread? So why wouldn't he move his vote off of me and on to someone he does want to lynch just incase?
I think that if fuba wasn't threatened, we would have never seen LJ again last night. It's not a coincidence that he managed to find time to vote right when Fuba pulled into a tie w/ HZ.
And that doesn't even mention the fact that he said he wanted to vote a lurker in that post and voted the super active guy.
|
Sorry for not being more active the last few days. Weekends are never really good for me. Gonna reread stuff.
|
On November 04 2013 23:12 Stutters695 wrote:
Now, what I consider most compelling as a reason to lynch him stems from his desire to lynch me after my vote switch. Yeah, I was just reading this and the fact that he made this post before the flip:On November 02 2013 08:51 Asinine wrote:
That Stutters vote is soooo suspicious if fuba flips town. Let's not forget that post. And then this post after the flip:On November 02 2013 09:03 Asinine wrote:
I want to lynch Stutters tomorrow. I'm putting hzflank on the backburner until we lynch this guy.
is just terrible.
He specifically says that you're suspicious if Fuba flips town. So Fuba flips scum and the first thought Asinine has is "We should lynch this guy"?
|
And then these posts:On November 02 2013 09:09 Asinine wrote:Show nested quote +On November 02 2013 09:06 hzflank wrote:On November 02 2013 09:03 Asinine wrote:
I want to lynch Stutters tomorrow. I'm putting hzflank on the backburner until we lynch this guy. You will put the guy who was almost lynched instead of the scum on the backburner, while you lynch the guy who dropped the hammer on the scum? Check again, Stutter's vote was extraneous and was only placed after it was obvious that fuba would die.
On November 02 2013 09:12 Asinine wrote:
Oh right, Stutters unvoted as well as voted. Fair enough. I still think he should be looked into, along with tehpoofter,
I mean, let's just assume that he was right with that fist post about the stutters vote being extraneous. Well why would he have said that an extraneous vote on a townie is suspicious?
|
On November 04 2013 23:53 Mig wrote:
JarJar do you plan on voting Asinine? It doesn't look like anyone is going to vote LJ. Was getting to it:
##Unvote
##Vote: Asinine
|
On November 04 2013 23:53 Mig wrote:
JarJar do you plan on voting Asinine? It doesn't look like anyone is going to vote LJ.
And I'll also say that LJ was right in that looking @ Oats filter, I have a hard time believing that they were scumbuddies.
|
|
|
On November 05 2013 01:56 Mig wrote:
So no one has a problem that every single person besides me/grack/odin has essentially voted for asinine? I think it's very likely that you're his teammate.
Everyone go look @ migs filter. Specifically night 1. He's totally anti-asinine throughout the whole night. Then after Oats flips and the mafia are a lynch away from losing, his attitude towards asinine totally changes and he starts looking for any reason not to lynch him.
|
On November 05 2013 03:06 Asinine wrote:Show nested quote +On November 05 2013 03:01 Stutters695 wrote:
Asinine, what changed between the immediate aftermath of the Fuba lynch and when you disappeared that made me go from (as far as I can tell) one of your top suspects to just I could be scum? I thought you had voted fuba after his lynch had gained a decisive majority. After I realized I was wrong, I downgraded you to only possible scum. So then whet did you mean by this post from right before the flip?On November 02 2013 08:51 Asinine wrote:
That Stutters vote is soooo suspicious if fuba flips town. Let's not forget that post.
|
On November 05 2013 03:10 Asinine wrote:Show nested quote +On November 05 2013 03:09 JarJarDrinks wrote:On November 05 2013 03:06 Asinine wrote:On November 05 2013 03:01 Stutters695 wrote:
Asinine, what changed between the immediate aftermath of the Fuba lynch and when you disappeared that made me go from (as far as I can tell) one of your top suspects to just I could be scum? I thought you had voted fuba after his lynch had gained a decisive majority. After I realized I was wrong, I downgraded you to only possible scum. So then whet did you mean by this post from right before the flip? On November 02 2013 08:51 Asinine wrote:
That Stutters vote is soooo suspicious if fuba flips town. Let's not forget that post. Yeah, read my posts after that post... I did and can't figure it out. Please answer my question directly. What did you think was suspicious about stutters vote ?
|
On November 05 2013 03:32 Asinine wrote:Show nested quote +On November 05 2013 03:29 JarJarDrinks wrote:On November 05 2013 03:10 Asinine wrote:On November 05 2013 03:09 JarJarDrinks wrote:On November 05 2013 03:06 Asinine wrote:On November 05 2013 03:01 Stutters695 wrote:
Asinine, what changed between the immediate aftermath of the Fuba lynch and when you disappeared that made me go from (as far as I can tell) one of your top suspects to just I could be scum? I thought you had voted fuba after his lynch had gained a decisive majority. After I realized I was wrong, I downgraded you to only possible scum. So then whet did you mean by this post from right before the flip? On November 02 2013 08:51 Asinine wrote:
That Stutters vote is soooo suspicious if fuba flips town. Let's not forget that post. Yeah, read my posts after that post... I did and can't figure it out. Please answer my question directly. What did you think was suspicious about stutters vote ? Let me spell it out for you. Show nested quote +On November 02 2013 08:51 Asinine wrote:
That Stutters vote is soooo suspicious if fuba flips town. Let's not forget that post. Show nested quote +On November 02 2013 09:03 Asinine wrote:
I want to lynch Stutters tomorrow. I'm putting hzflank on the backburner until we lynch this guy. Show nested quote +On November 02 2013 09:10 Pandain wrote:On November 02 2013 09:09 Asinine wrote:On November 02 2013 09:06 hzflank wrote:On November 02 2013 09:03 Asinine wrote:
I want to lynch Stutters tomorrow. I'm putting hzflank on the backburner until we lynch this guy. You will put the guy who was almost lynched instead of the scum on the backburner, while you lynch the guy who dropped the hammer on the scum? Check again, Stutter's vote was extraneous and was only placed after it was obvious that fuba would die. It was far from extraneous, it put us in the lead. It doesn't clear him because he voted hz before for very weak reasons, but it doesn't really mean he's scum. Show nested quote +On November 02 2013 09:12 Asinine wrote:
Oh right, Stutters unvoted as well as voted. Fair enough. I still think he should be looked into, along with tehpoofter, No, that only explains why you were suspicious about stutters AFTER the flip. You thought that his vote was just a token vote for a teammate after the fact.
When you made that first post you thought that Fuba was gonna flip town. Why was stutters vote suspicious @ that point?
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
