On November 03 2013 05:51 syllogism wrote:
I'm reading your mafia QT posts and it's pretty amazing that you thought that the case against you was weak.

e: holyflare

You had no case other than role pm. You just linked your old one that had flawed reasoning.

Holyflare

United Kingdom30774 Posts

November 02 2013 21:18 GMT

#5759

On November 03 2013 06:12 syllogism wrote:

Show nested quote +

Those posts from day 1 were posts no townie would ever make, but sadly I wasn't thinking clearly after having Cephiro and CR flip town. Besides that, you lied about your role ability in a way that makes no sense and there was a host confirmation that you were lying about the role completely. I am very much willing to admit when my cases are weak and when I'm wrong, but this is absolutely not such a situation.

Those posts? You linked 1 post linking to lonemeow that i would absolutely post as town in every game. People said palmar was town. Lonemeow comes back in with 0 posts and votes him with no reasoning. I am going to post it out and also question the other people on palmar. I also made a case on him to confirm after the night but he got vigd. Day 1 you are also not likely to hit mafia abd so killing lurkers as policy like i said is the most optimal as they were the ones posting enough to keep themselves in but not contributing. You also made no case if you just linked to an old one that you clearly had a good enough reason to drop after my answers. So your only case was a mod pm.

Holyflare

United Kingdom30774 Posts

November 02 2013 21:24 GMT

#5761

However, my response to asking mods to post was a tell so yeh there was that.

Holyflare

United Kingdom30774 Posts

November 02 2013 21:29 GMT

#5765

No, i fully admit my play wasn't towny but the posts that were mentioned have no alignment indicative nature in them.

Holyflare

United Kingdom30774 Posts

November 02 2013 21:36 GMT

#5773

Well you are ridiculous. That part on stutters was fine. The others were policy. That is in no way alignment indicative and to say that is ridiculous. In what way would a scum mindset make that post? There isn't any reason to. It wasn't under the guise of scum hunting. It was 24 hours in and did point out stutters posts who were scummy. Nobody in the thread at the time said they wanted a palmar lynch. Guess what happened? He got lynched.

Sn0 at the time posted very questionable things. You said it was just rehashing the thread but only 1 of them was and that was sn0,the other 2, well palmar at least was directly against thread sentiment at the time.

Holyflare

United Kingdom30774 Posts

November 02 2013 21:40 GMT

#5775

On November 03 2013 06:31 Grackaroni wrote:
Syllo had some good points against him when the 1 scum Hufflepuff check came out

I still can't believe that you were scum acting excited that another scum town slipped by saying squib. Also that you claimed a secre vote after that doing that.

I haven't played enough mafia to know when a role is considered blue or not so I thought if I could say it was a 1 shot vote then I would fit in. Especially as scum had a role cop, if i was checked by a town role cop it would show my vote.

Holyflare

United Kingdom30774 Posts

November 02 2013 21:42 GMT

#5776

There was also a lot of talk in the qt that i was setting up to make myself look more towny that you didn't see about that slip post i made, that is why it looks odd to you.

It's easy to point out posts that look scummy after the game is over as you know i am scum, this would be the case from every filter in this game.