EPT1) Are you telling me that SnB said VA is scum?
2) The reason for my vote on SnB was not because those 2 little thingies you quoted. The reason why it is still on SnB is because.
Golden Sun: The Broken Seal Mini Mafia - Page 15
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Koshi
Belgium38799 Posts
1) Are you telling me that SnB said VA is scum? 2) The reason for my vote on SnB was not because those 2 little thingies you quoted. The reason why it is still on SnB is because. | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
Uhh, we just talked about OP's post and his questions and you agreed with me they look bad. Are you now disagreeing again? Why? Do you think there is something useful he says in his post? If there is, can you point out what that is. Zealos: Pick two things that you find to be most important atm in this game and comment on them please. | ||
|
blubbdavid
Switzerland2412 Posts
On September 12 2013 21:07 Koshi wrote: @blubbdavid 1) Are you telling me that SnB said VA is scum? 2) The reason for my vote on SnB was not because those 2 little thingies you quoted. The reason why it is still on SnB is because. Oh looks like I confused him with papa. sry for that. But I still find it suspicious that you press on SnB so much because of because. The reason why it is still on SnB is because. What do you think about VA. | ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38799 Posts
On September 12 2013 21:10 raynpelikoneet wrote: Uhh, we just talked about OP's post and his questions and you agreed with me they look bad. Are you now disagreeing again? Why? Do you think there is something useful he says in his post? If there is, can you point out what that is. What the fuck? I LIKE OP HIS POSTS! Read my first answer to you again... | ||
|
goodkarma
United States1067 Posts
On September 12 2013 21:05 blubbdavid wrote: Forgot to add: ##Vote: Koshi And I will also look into Grack, don't like his posting. What specifically about Grack's posting has stood out to you? | ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38799 Posts
On September 12 2013 21:13 blubbdavid wrote: Oh looks like I confused him with papa. sry for that. But I still find it suspicious that you press on SnB so much because of because. What do you think about VA. I am not lynching VA first day. Unless crazy happens. | ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38799 Posts
| ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
On September 12 2013 21:20 Koshi wrote: What the fuck? I LIKE OP HIS POSTS! Read my first answer to you again... OH right you did. You also said "now his questions seem bad", i got confused. Anyways, is there anything else in OP's posts that is good besides the questions? I mean, there are like what.. 500 other words. | ||
|
Zealos
United Kingdom3576 Posts
| ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38799 Posts
On September 12 2013 21:26 raynpelikoneet wrote: OH right you did. You also said "now his questions seem bad", i got confused. Anyways, is there anything else in OP's posts that is good besides the questions? I mean, there are like what.. 500 other words. I meant only the first ones that he asked to PS. He is reading the thread and keeping notes in those spoilers of him. That is good. Transparant. No secrets. Makes it possible for us to follow a clear thoughtprocess. (If he keeps it up, which I think he will!) | ||
|
blubbdavid
Switzerland2412 Posts
Koshi, Grack and Kush Koshi for aforementioned reasons. Kush for his valuable contributions. And Grack: On September 12 2013 14:31 Grackaroni wrote: 1Pandain came into the thread with a long constructed post but he didn't analyze shit. 2He gave out some town reads that agreed with town sentiment. 3His reasoning for S&B being town is absolute bull. (S&B saw Debears post in a newbie game currently in signups, HOW DOES THAT EQUATE TO S&B GOING OUTSIDE THE GAME AND LOOKING FOR MAFIA??) 4He writes to a whole lot of nothing about OP (why did you even include that if you've made no conclusion off of it? 5And to top it off he then says that me and kush are BAD players so we are the top lynch choices 6Now when I called him out on him being more interested in lynching people for being bad than scum he says that we should focus on lurkers. I don't believe that Pandain has any interest in hunting scum. ##Vote: Pandain I disagree here with points 1,3,4,5 1. wut 3. have you already made out of thread investigation, Grack? 4. wut 5. you two should be lynched because of scum behaviour, not because you are bad On September 12 2013 16:08 Grackaroni wrote: I thought that at first glance, but I have a hard time believing that when he ends his read on me with, I'm not sure if he's scum. What I read out of that post is that he is most interested in policy lynching the weaker players. Lets get real, Kush playing anti-town is nothing new from him. He does it as both alignments. If he doesn't start contributing, we vig him and we move on. Lynches should be used on players we can actually analyze. I've only been scum one time and I was called out immediately by syllogism for wanting to policy lynch someone I called a weaker player. I see pandain displaying similar behavior. Aside from that i think that scum generally come in the middle of the day with long constructed posts such as these, this one in particular gave very little analysis. After that he peaced out. WoS made a post like this as well but it was clear to me that he was actually trying to analyze my behavior. Defending your scum comrade much, leaving him to the vig, if there is one? On September 12 2013 16:49 Grackaroni wrote: Hey Koshi, since you're here what do you think of my case on Pandain? Can you expand upon your read beyond bad entrance. Hey scumrade, since you're here and in the scum QT anyway, why don't we press together against Pandain? Can you help me find more stuff so that it looks legit. | ||
|
Onegu
United States9699 Posts
| ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
| ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
Pandain gave out some town reads that agreed with town sentiment. | ||
|
blubbdavid
Switzerland2412 Posts
On September 12 2013 21:20 Koshi wrote: I am not lynching VA first day. Unless crazy happens. Fair enough. May I have your opinion on Grack? | ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38799 Posts
On September 12 2013 21:39 blubbdavid wrote: Fair enough. May I have your opinion on Grack? We follow the same line of thought. So I am happy with him. His post directed towards WoS was very good, knowing that he just came off a conversation with VA and decided that wasn't his best target to pursue. Grack is on my do not lynch list. | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
On September 12 2013 21:45 Koshi wrote: (1) We follow the same line of thought. So I am happy with him. (2) His post directed towards WoS was very good, knowing that he just came off a conversation with VA and decided that wasn't his best target to pursue. Grack is on my do not lynch list. 1) Is there more than his read on Pandain and the WoS thing? 2) Could you elaborate more on why the post directed to WoS is very good. After re-reading the whole SnB--VA argument and all the players involved in it Grackaroni comes out definitely looking the worst and WoS the best. | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
| ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38799 Posts
2) You think WoS his case on Grack was strengthened after Grack defended himself? imo he destroyed WoS his case. rayn, what didn't you like about grack his defense after WoS attacked him? | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
On September 12 2013 22:26 Koshi wrote: 1) I know I was liking grack yesterday. I could look up again why if that helps you. Probably also because he didn't jump on SnB but jumped on VA instead. 2) You think WoS his case on Grack was strengthened after Grack defended himself? imo he destroyed WoS his case. rayn, what didn't you like about grack his defense after WoS attacked him? 2) No he did not. WoS had two points. - First one, Grack's answer is "That could be the case here". - Second one, doesn't prove WoS is wrong and Grack is right. WoS i think is focusing on wrong things on Grack imo. GK has the right approach. Grack says one thing, then he says something that makes the first thing invalid, and this goes on and on. Here: In all seriousness, you need to explain why you are confident SnB is town already this early in the game. Can you give me some reasoning? I never put much stock in my day1 reads, especially this early, so for somebody to come into the thread already certain about S&B's alignment seems scummy to me. If you've got a strong town read on day1 you should defend him. It's the fact that Vayne had a strong town read in the first place at that point in the game that is scummy.I saw nothing that gave me a strong town read on you which gives me the impression he is bullshitting. It's becoming more and more clear to me that Vayne is a very different player than myself so I will take that into consideration. He argues for 2 hours about someone having a different playstyle than he does. Also Vayne explained his read. -"vayne is scummy for having a strong read on someone" -"i don't put much stock on early reads" -"so grack, are people scummy for having strong reads early on?" -"no, actually vayne is not scummy, he just plays differently than i do" No shit Sherlock? | ||
| ||
