EPTDesert Mini Mafia - Page 5
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43268 Posts
| ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43268 Posts
On August 29 2013 22:00 Sylencia wrote: 2nd half - the process from hopeless was there was a mention about Sn0, hopeless said it showed he was actively reading, so I took a look and it looked pretty dumb Does the bolded part make sense to you now that you have read hopeless' filter. where does he say so? | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43268 Posts
| ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43268 Posts
| ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43268 Posts
On August 30 2013 00:20 Sn0_Man wrote: Rayn we played this last game. I'm not gonna sit here and answer your questions all game. You obviously have a conclusion that you drew. If you want to share it with the thread in order please feel free. Yes i have a conclusion. I am a bit puzzled however why are you unwilling to look at what Sylencia says about you? If someone called me out for reasons that make no sense to me i would definitely be willing to point that out in thread. | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43268 Posts
Who do you think is most likely mafia atm? | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43268 Posts
On August 30 2013 00:37 Tutankoopa wrote: 1. He's been acting weird about the policy lynch on rayn, attacking me as if he seriously thought that I was dead set on lynching yamato in my first post of the game. 2. Calls rayn's play stupid afterwards. Calling somebody's play "stupid" while not expressing a scum read on them implies you having a town, or at least not scum read on them. It seemed fake, as if the whole time he's had extra information, and he knows rayn is town and is subconsciously using that to justify his case on people who accuse rayn. Yes I had read his filter and I changed my mind on a reread. Editing takes effort. I've read everything else in the thread but I don't have anything to say about any of it. I'll try to be more clear: 1) Hopeless thought process is; "rayn is being stupid, but that does not make him mafia. In fact it's more likely that it makes him town. I don't understand the policy in lynching him". You respond to this with: Also, you say rayn's play is stupid yet you also claim to not understand the policy lynch. Explain? I think Hopeless thought process is pretty clear. What do you think there is for him to explain? 2) You didn't really answer my question. Why did you start writing a post before you had read the whole thread? What's the point of doing so because you do not have all the information available? That to me seems like you are contributing to something you can't be called out for later because the information you are contributing to is no more relevant. 3) Can you explain why you wanted people to find out you are a smurf and why did you refuse to tell me that you are a smurf in the first place later when i straight up asked you about it? | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43268 Posts
On August 30 2013 00:45 Sn0_Man wrote: PS: essentially he's allowed to misread me but not allowed to read me perfectly then 180 w/o explanation. The latter needs explanation or else he joins my "scummy" pile. That is a good point, i missed that tbh. I have something else in mind, but i still would like to see if marv sees what i see before i bring it up. | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43268 Posts
| ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43268 Posts
On August 30 2013 01:06 Tutankoopa wrote: Re: Rayn 1) Anyone who claims that I was seriously pushing a lynching with my first post is playing dumb. I don't think hopeless is capable of that logic. He's being ever so serious about his case on a guy's first post of the game and it doesn't feel right. 2) re read what I wrote. You are 100% incorrect about this. 3) you are the one who made it an issue. I've said as little as possible about it and only when asked about by you. 1) But why did you use the exact wording you used in your question to Hopeless? Your answer to me now is nowhere near an answer to the question you asked from Hopeless. It's a completely different thing. 2) Simple question. Why do you post before you have read the whole thread? You never answered me. 3) For real man. Your first post in this game is a direct smurf claim or a scum claim. Do you disagree? | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43268 Posts
On August 30 2013 01:21 Sn0_Man wrote: Rayn the thread is 20 pages and ur filter is 5. This isn't new, but you are spamming and making the thread hard to read. Show me one post from my filter after the first two in this game that is spam and explain your statement. | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43268 Posts
On August 30 2013 01:54 debears wrote: rayne: can you organize your top 3 scumreads for me and give elaborate reasoning on them while I do mine? Tutankoopa: - I can't see any direction in his play - When i ask about his motives behind his actions he sums up what he did, not why he did (which is what i am asking). Multiple times. - He has apparently no reads at all. Sylencia: - Him landing on reading Sno is weird. He says he went into Sno's filter by reading Hopeless' filter and the post where Hopeless calls sno out for "appearing that he is reading". That post of Hopeless is bullshit (because it's the second post in the game he refers to - Sno appears to be reading the game by reading the OP? wtf?). However when Sylencia reaches Sno's filter he points out something else that implies Sno is not reading but appearing to be reading. I find that whole scene fishy. Hopeless: - Calling out Sno at the start of the game (read my Sylencia read) for bullshit reasons. - Seemingly not understanding Tutankoopa's first post and the follow up of his after that. Really, it's quite obvious. - Still arguing about that, and that's pretty much the only thing he has done besides the Sno thingy. | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43268 Posts
| ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43268 Posts
| ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43268 Posts
| ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43268 Posts
On August 30 2013 02:31 Sn0_Man wrote: Can anybody provide some corroboration to this: I'm kinda using it as a reason to dismiss debears case but I'll admit A) Marv looks unhelpful this game so I'm not sure I should use anything he says to make reads and B) I've never played with sciberbia. yeah what marv says is true. | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43268 Posts
| ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43268 Posts
On August 30 2013 02:39 debears wrote: Ugh i mean by discredit, "tells people to ignore you" I could see him doing that given how i played the first 24h in Ego. | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43268 Posts
On August 30 2013 02:44 debears wrote: How about this line from him? If he wanted you ignored for posts of no real content, then why did he defend himself against you if he is town. If he is town, he would know your accusations against him were bullshit. In other words, your accusations should have been ignored by himself according to himself. The only way your accusations held enough merit for him to not ignore you is if he is mafia Follow me?> I don't think so. My thought process on him is the following: He noticed my posting at the start of this game was quite similar than in Ego. We were both town in that game. I was actually "shitposting" there as i had no time to play that game in the beginning. He thought i would follow up like i did in Ego, therefore he told people to ignore me. When i askd him "why shut me down" he realized i am not going to play like i did in Ego, and clarified his statement that if i am gonna shitpost, i should be ignored. If not, i should be listened. That post of mine directed to him was actually contentful and he realized he was wrong on me, and retracted from his argument. As i said before he could be doing that as scum aswell, but i do not think it makes him scum because i can see why he did what he did from town pov. On August 30 2013 02:49 Hopeless1der wrote: rayn...i just DO NOT understand how you come to a scum read on me. My words on Sno were pure hypothetical "why would you ever do that as scum?" I'm still harping on TK because, like you, I think he's scum and also that he is misrepresenting my reasons for voting him. I don't understand your first post about Sno in any way. How does reading the OP = "trying to look like you are reading the thread"? | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43268 Posts
On April 05 2013 09:25 sciberbia wrote: My strategy as scum (as I explained in the post-game) was to try to play exactly as I do as town. The reason that I posted setup speculation as scum is precisely because that is what I usually do as town. I tend to start the game by inviting discussion on the setup because imo it is the best (only?) way to get people meaningfully talking about something actually relevant to the game. The alternative way of generating discussion, as you are demonstrating, is to wait until someone else makes a post and then attack them for it, but I don't tend to form scumreads off someone's first post, and I don't like to lie about my reads, hence discussion on setup. So he does setup speculation as either alignment. You are right about the third faction point, i found that out to be weird aswell. Another thing that feels not right about sciberbia is that now that i read his filter from Ego he was really pro-active from the start of the game, gave out reads for multiple people with decent reasoning. I don't see that here. He is more laid back and seems to be observing more than playing the game. sciberbia you should answer debears post. and give some reads out. | ||
| ||
