EPTI mean, who cares about which one is ACTUALLY scum, right?
Desert Mini Mafia - Page 12
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
yamato77
11589 Posts
I mean, who cares about which one is ACTUALLY scum, right? | ||
|
yamato77
11589 Posts
On September 12 2013 00:06 Sn0_Man wrote: But he isn't even scum he's just dumb town... stop being bad | ||
|
yamato77
11589 Posts
On September 12 2013 00:14 raynpelikoneet wrote: In the meantime, yamato: 1) Why did you not explain your read on Sno to Hapa when he asked about it (besides me) multiple times? 2) What was your thought process of me being scum on N2-D3 start given that i saved Oats on D1? 3) Why did you do nothing in the game for 5 irl days D3 ->? i explained my read of sn0, period. we had this discussion. I rescinded ALL OF MY READS at the start of D3 for the purpose of re-examining them. saving Oats isn't necessarily an alignment indicative play. nor is it enough to make you "confirmed town" once he flipped town. i don't but into confirmed townies too often anyway, it's easy to lose games that way. i did stuff, you guys just ignored it and/or called me scum for it. story of my life. | ||
|
yamato77
11589 Posts
On September 12 2013 00:15 raynpelikoneet wrote: EBWOP: 4) Why did you think Hapa is scum on N3? 5) Why did you think Thrawn is scum on D3-D5? because he obviously didn't give much of a fuck about actually discerning my alignment. Hapa, as town, should know better than to call me scum when I spout off conspiracy theories thrawn, like I said many times, just had his activity trail off into uselessness near the end. Also, his about-face of his read on me was fishy and not at all what I would expect from a player who WATCHED ME PLAY SCUM IN GoT, and has played with me many times in the past. I'm actually confirmed town when I do stuff like accuse people who have a near zero chance of being scum. it's what I do. | ||
|
yamato77
11589 Posts
it's mind-boggling that it gets to the last 12 hours of D5 until you guys stop and think about this. Maybe I was being a dick earlier today, but really, you guys deserved it. and it helped me catch the real mafia between Sn0/Onegu. | ||
|
yamato77
11589 Posts
On September 12 2013 00:22 raynpelikoneet wrote: No you did not explain your read on Sno. Hapa asked you about it in two posts after you had "explained it". Why would i as mafia save Oats from being lynched over two lurkers when all of them are town? FT and Slam were lynchbaits this game, i could have just said "you are all fucking stupid, don't lynch Oats, lynch X" instead of claiming Mason with him (something that ensures he will not get lynched). No you didn't. You gave a read on someone, i questioned i, you said "lololol, okay X is not scum, Y is." I questioned it, you said "lololol, maybe Z is". how hard is it to understand that I reread the fucking game with a fresh outlook and began to realize that Sn0's involvement in the game has been high when he was in the thread? I explained this. You guys didn't read. I don't give a fuck about it anymore. the play is not that important. I don't read into it because it doesn't make sense as EITHER alignment, really. You should take your own reads with a grain of salt and realize that you damn well could have been wrong there and moved the lynch off scum. No, I gave my reads, which were Hapa/Thrawn, then Thrawn/X, and then Sn0 (because of his lynch-Onegu thing), and now Onegu. you wrote them off and called me scum. You can't say I didn't do stuff when I clearly did. That's called being bad. | ||
|
yamato77
11589 Posts
On September 12 2013 00:23 raynpelikoneet wrote: But you know this role stuff maybe best in this game. Hapa was CONFIRMED town unless he was scum doctor after debears' flip.. thrawn had, yes. So did you. Is a scumdoc completely out of the question in a closed theme game of this nature? My confirmation-biased mind thought not. | ||
|
yamato77
11589 Posts
On September 12 2013 00:31 raynpelikoneet wrote: I'll be honest with you here. I would have expected a lot more from you in this game if you were town. The things that bother me: 1) You analyzed the voteing patterns. What did you do on D1. Let's look at it; You talk only about marv/Hapa. Then your vote goes onto FT with reasoning "Heads/Tails?". How does ANYONE look worse than you by your own analyses? How can you call anyone scum by their D1 behaviour when you yourself don't take part in any relevant discussion, if you think HApa/marv discussion is relevant, why not push their lynches then? D2; You vote for Hapa. At that time i found the vote reasonable. However, that's all you do. You didn't give a shit about anything, when it's clear Hapa is not gonna get lynched you don't say anything about the current candidates or contribute to the lynch. 3) From there onwards you call the two confirmed townies scum. You call the confirmed scum who the confirmed townies nailed as scum "not sure to be scum". You should know better than this. 4) After that you call all of Thrawn/Sno/Onegu scum, whenever i ask relevant questions about your top scum read you change the candidate (as i pointed out earlier). 5) You leave your vote on marv, the you say "im not auto-lynching Sylencia on D4 (lol)", then you fuck off for 5 days.. Does town!yamato do stuff like this? Yesterday I read 5 games of yours. 2 scum games where you were not killed on D1/D2 and 3 town games where you were alive D3 ->. I don't see similitaries in your town games. I see similitaries in your scumgames. Most of this can be explained by the fact that I commit less time to this game than I used to. | ||
|
yamato77
11589 Posts
On September 12 2013 00:33 Sn0_Man wrote: You are such a victim yam. Lets look at your reads, starting with this: 12 Hours later, when slam flips town and Hapa has a proven doc claim: "Oops looks like I had 3 townies I wanted to lynch. My bad" 3 days later the best he's come up with is This is after *voting* for rayn D3 quite seriously for a period of time. "Oops 2 more townies on my hit list, still no scum". Dis guy can't possibly be town. Onegu filter is quite contrastable since he's been interested in lynching scum pretty much as long as anybody else has. you're bad stop being bad being good is called critically thinking | ||
|
yamato77
11589 Posts
On September 12 2013 00:34 yamato77 wrote: you're bad stop being bad being good is called critically thinking to put it simply wrong =/= scum right =/= town baddie | ||
|
yamato77
11589 Posts
On September 12 2013 00:33 Onegu wrote: First off it makes alot of sense, when I am not sure about sn0 100% and think you can flip mafia also, I bring up my points for sn0 being scum, rayn then counters them. I ask him questions he gives his strong reads. At that point rayn isnt switching, sn0 isnt voteing for himself and yamato has selfvoted and said he doesnt care, this gives him a good enough chance to flip scum that I am comfortable putting my vote on him and let the game end, at that point yamato wasnt doing anything. Second if it is going to be yamato giving up and rayn not moveing his vote why not move the deadline up. so if it is how you say it is (which is questionable, because that's not really what it looks like), then what do you think now? | ||
|
yamato77
11589 Posts
On September 05 2013 23:47 Onegu wrote: Yeah Syl is most likely scum, I have thought he was scummy since day one, also lynching him has zero downside if his claim is true we still dont lose the game, if he is scum fake claiming scum dies its a no lose situation. ##VOTE SYLENCIA you didn't vote syl until after his claim, so you get zero townie points for bussing your scummate | ||
|
yamato77
11589 Posts
On September 12 2013 00:40 Onegu wrote: Again you did give up, I quoted you where you said you give up. You even selfvoted at the time. it was a ploy to see who would FEEL THE NEED to continue to justify voting for someone who (on the surface) didn't care about dying. Rayn and Sn0 did that, you just left your vote and peaced. | ||
|
yamato77
11589 Posts
On September 12 2013 00:45 Onegu wrote: Ok you are correct it was after his claim. But you think I have been bussing him since day 1 then? My case on him almost got him lynched day one, if it wasnt for marv and sn0 changeing the wagon when he was set to be lynched we wouldnt be haveing this conversation. Also syl voted me day 1 so you think we were hard bussing each other since day 1? It's certainly not out of the realm of possibility. Your "case on D1" is also minus a vote, because your vote went on FT. It smells like a bus. | ||
|
yamato77
11589 Posts
You could be ABSOLUTELY SURE who is mafia based on who gets shot tonight. | ||
|
yamato77
11589 Posts
On September 12 2013 00:57 raynpelikoneet wrote: Sh.. do not talk about no-lynching. I wanna hear Onegu now. i have a limited amount of time i need sleeeeeeeeep | ||
|
yamato77
11589 Posts
On September 12 2013 01:00 raynpelikoneet wrote: How much can you hang on? maybe an hour | ||
|
yamato77
11589 Posts
| ||
|
yamato77
11589 Posts
| ||
|
yamato77
11589 Posts
##vote: no-lynch Now, Rayn, this puts you in control of where this goes. If you think Onegu is mafia, you should vote no-lynch with me and we'll roll the dice. If you leave your vote on Onegu, I will get lynched, so you shouldn't do that. If you reconsider your read on Sn0 and think he's mafia, you can lynch him instead, but it's more risky than no-lynching. Why I do this is because I'm actually not as confident now. While Onegu LOOKS bad, he almost always does look bad, even as town, no? Then I look at Sn0, and I think, "am I really that confident that him unwavering in his stance of lynching me makes him town?" Because, as scum, he has had no reason to change his vote since he placed it today, so why would he? | ||
| ||
