| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
FirmTofu
United States1956 Posts
On August 22 2013 05:10 Koshi wrote: ^ you haven't said why you find the Snowman scummy. + That veteran list is silly. Everytime I make a case, everyone just skims over it and nothing comes of it. I'm trying a new approach this time. asses your current base beliefs and then reach a logical conclusion while incorporating the NK. Let me know if you have trouble following the logic or if there are any holes in it. | ||
|
FirmTofu
United States1956 Posts
On August 22 2013 05:12 raynpelikoneet wrote: I think geript is scum for two reasons. I did not like his push on Crazometer at all. The reasons were not good and it seemed like he was trying to swing the discussion off WoS (he did not comment on WoS stuff at all at first). When i said later on i think geript is scum he instantly started yelling me "i know i am lurky as scum, but now i have been busy". Over-defensive, i never even said why i think he is scum. I would like to remind you that association cases don't amount to much. Try not to base your case on him on the fact that he is associated to WoS. Remember how that logic turned out in Titanic? | ||
|
FirmTofu
United States1956 Posts
| ||
|
FirmTofu
United States1956 Posts
On August 22 2013 05:22 raynpelikoneet wrote: Nonono. It's not an association case. It does not matter what alignment WoS is. geript as town does not know WoS' alignment. He does not look / comment on the case on WoS in any way. Instead he points out another suspect with reasons i find to be weak. The correct way to play as town is to tell what do you think of the case, point out if something is wrong in it, so that townies do not look at the wrong places. Or agree with it if you do. Add something if you have something to add. geript does none of it, he just let's the case go unnoticed. Fair enough, I can see that. | ||
|
FirmTofu
United States1956 Posts
| ||
|
FirmTofu
United States1956 Posts
Umm...no he didn't. I've read his filter and there is no retraction of the scum read on rayn anywhere between these two posts: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=425521¤tpage=35#687 http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=425521¤tpage=42#832 | ||
|
FirmTofu
United States1956 Posts
On August 23 2013 00:27 Sn0_Man wrote: Did I miss something or was *nobody* roleblocked N0? That seems important... This is what Sn0 has to says right after afking for nearly 2 irl days. He wants to draw attention to the fact that no one has claimed roleblocked. Why would anyone want to draw attention to something so inconsequential? Possible Explanation: Sn0 is scum and he deliberately didn't roleblock N0 in order to get town to think that there is no roleblocker. Possible Motivation: Sn0 wants to roleblock someone N1 so that that person looks bad Day 2 when they claim that they were roleblocked. Town will ask said claimer how it is possible that he was roleblocked when there was no one roleblocked on N0. Because no one has brought it up throughout Day 1, he wins free town cred by pointing it out and simultaneously leading town into a pointless conversation. Yes, I admit a large part of this is speculation. However, if Sn0 is actually scum, I think this is exactly what they were planning. On August 23 2013 02:43 Sn0_Man wrote: How is it remotely acceptable or town motivated to say "I'm untouchable anybody who attacks me is scum"? Thats easily a scum-favoured atmosphere to create. There was no ad-hominem, I'm commenting on the terribleness of your play. Scum-hunting, in fact. Something you MAY wish to attempt (you haven't started yet I notice). K maybe now there is ad-hom. Isn't that exactly what you are doing? You're attacking Vayne and me because we are attacking you. You haven't been actually scumhunting at all this game. You just attacked a few random people in the beginning of the game to provide the illusion of scumhunting, then you afked to allow the thread to fester. Once a few people caught on to your bullshit, you de-lurk and attack the people who attacked you. ##vote: Sn0_man | ||
|
FirmTofu
United States1956 Posts
| ||
|
FirmTofu
United States1956 Posts
On August 23 2013 04:31 kushm4sta wrote: I think we should lynch FT today actually. Anyone want to with me? ##unvote ##vote FT You wanna provide some reasoning? Do you disagree with what I said? | ||
|
FirmTofu
United States1956 Posts
On August 23 2013 04:34 kushm4sta wrote: you think scum didn't roleblock someone on purpose just so sno could say "no roleblockers lol?' why would scum do that I explained that. Scum didn't roleblock N0 so that they could roleblock N1. If they roleblock N1, the person who is roleblocked will appear scummy because no one was roleblocked N0. Scum was playing at driving discussion on Day 2 about roleblocks to divert attention away from them. Regardless, how does this "conspiracy theory" make me scummy? Care to explain? | ||
|
FirmTofu
United States1956 Posts
| ||
|
FirmTofu
United States1956 Posts
On August 23 2013 04:34 Oatsmaster wrote: I would totally lynch FT You've been saying this for a while now. I don't really understand why you've never made the move to actually vote me. If you find me scummy, why aren't you pushing your reads? Why aren't you pressuring me? | ||
|
FirmTofu
United States1956 Posts
On August 23 2013 04:43 Oatsmaster wrote: Why would scum fake a rb claim when there wasnt 1 day 1 FT? Your explanation tries really hard to paint Snodude as scummy. But its bridge too far. My intention was not really to paint Sno_man as scummy. I was literally posting stuff that I was thinking. As town, I like to be as transparent as possible. If I'm thinking something, I usually post it. I understand you think my theory is unlikely, but can you explain how: FirmTofu posts an unlikely theory=> FirmTofu is scum ? | ||
|
FirmTofu
United States1956 Posts
| ||
|
FirmTofu
United States1956 Posts
On August 23 2013 04:52 Oatsmaster wrote: FT posts an unlikely theory that happens to paint his top scumread as scum. Sadly that theory is bullshit. Scum post bullshit. Somemore bullshit is the reason you voted for Snodude. like what the fuck is this shit? Its all speculation. You are providing shitty reasons that snodude is scum for his gameplay. scum cant find good reasons because they know they are attacking town. Your reasons are shit. Shit reasons+speculation that is totally wrong+not attacking someone who fits your apparent view of scummy play to a tee. isnt this what vayne is doing? I'm not sure how any of that is speculation. That is exactly what Sn0_man has been doing all game. Read his filter. Sn0, can you respond to my earlier post that you conveniently ignored the entire game? | ||
|
FirmTofu
United States1956 Posts
On August 21 2013 10:39 FirmTofu wrote: I just caught this post. Sno, could you explain how rayn being accusatory and aggressive makes him scum? It looks like you are simply trying to discredit him here.You don't seem to be pushing for his lynch, but you want everyone to ignore him. Why would a townie want this when he isn't in rayn's crosshairs? What town motivation do you have to discredit rayn when he isn't even attacking you? | ||
|
FirmTofu
United States1956 Posts
On August 23 2013 05:00 Koshi wrote: Why are people outraged by FT his insane theory while the insane theory of the Snowman was ignored? (that rayn and I are scum because we failed a play in the thread because I didn't read the scum QT) Because I'm town and scum are piling up on me. | ||
|
FirmTofu
United States1956 Posts
They are the only people who are capable of figuring this game out. I unfortunately have to go to work. I'll be back in 5-6 hours. I sincerely hope you all will come to your senses by then. | ||
|
FirmTofu
United States1956 Posts
| ||
|
FirmTofu
United States1956 Posts
On August 23 2013 07:34 raynpelikoneet wrote: You will be able to play GMM III at work? Isn't that game starting in a day or 2? | ||
| ||
|
|
Sparkling Tuna Cup
WardiTV European League
PiGosaur Monday
OSC
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
The PondCast
Online Event
Korean StarCraft League
CranKy Ducklings
Online Event
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
