Aperture Mafia 2: Episode 2 - Page 21

On September 02 2013 04:27 Clarity_nl wrote:


The way you decide to do this is to write out all 7 names and call all seven "extremely suspicious". Instead of just saying "if geript flips red we should look at the people who vote felkyr"



Alright, let's just buy this explanation that you didn't scumslip and you were simply talking about a scenario where geript flips scum.

How is trying to push a wagon that is not geript fine, but if it is felkyr it is extremely suspicious.
stronganbig has it right. It seems like you haven't even read the game and you just went off the votecount to paint a wide array of people scummy.

Not only did you backtrack from 100% certain geript will flip scum to "I dunno what he'll flip but if he flips scum blabla"
But then there's this:


This is some class A bullshit. You just explained why you don't wanna waste a bunch of time narrowing down the list, and then you immediately follow it by saying Obviously at least half of the people on the list are almost certainly town. If it is obvious, why would you have to spend ANY amount of time on it?
If it is obvious, why do you call EVERYONE on that list suspicious??

I try to make him clarify:


Zentor is saying everybody knows which of the people on that list are likely town.
Then WHY DID YOU CALL EVERYONE ON THAT LIST EXTREMELY SUSPICIOUS.

Zentor cannot keep his story straight, which means he's not actually thinking about the game.
His posts (especially this votecount analysis without context) are designed to make it look like he's thinking about the game.
Therefore Zentor is scum.