A Bluelightz Mafia "The Attack" - Page 4
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
| ||
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
Besides, maybe oats doesn't vote and gets kilt ![]() | ||
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
I don't have a problem with wondering what caused getmoript's read to swap on you, or what the whole deal was. Maybe worthwhile to say and then see whether JJD thinks it's valid or not. | ||
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
| ||
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
oats, please knock it off. If you don't want to read, don't want to do anything, then fine. But don't post that you won't bother to go read the thread and are worried about a test and have to go pop your hemorrhoids and then turn around and ask other people to scumhunt for you. If you're willing to read someone else's scumhunting and reads, which you ought to be given that you're asking for them, then you should be willing to read your own posts or the guy you wanted lynched. DrH, catch up or replace out. If you catch up, we can chat. People have some reason to pile on you or find your actions at deadline scummy, but you won't fully know why unless you read through and catch up. getmoript, last time town no-lynched on D1 because mafia wouldn't show up to place the final vote on their buddy, half of you won the game. That rounds up to the whole hydra winning. So odds are you will win this game if you're town. If you're mafia, then WoS lost that game and so the whole hydra will lose this one too. It's science. | ||
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
On July 23 2013 00:42 Oatsmaster wrote: This.What austin? On July 22 2013 23:19 Oatsmaster wrote: Of course, if someone had a gun and wanted to use it, I might make a case. On July 22 2013 23:23 Oatsmaster wrote: I was busy, I made a joke. I have a test I might fail tmr. I am appealing to emotion, and its fun jerking you around on a rope. On July 22 2013 23:29 Oatsmaster wrote: I would love to talk about something if it didnt involving looking at other pages. rayn is mafia, but you don't quite remember why, can't be bothered to go looking for it, and want to chat if you don't have to look at anything else. On July 22 2013 23:33 Oatsmaster wrote: I cant vote for anyone, game is boring. So who do you think is scum marv? You think im totes town, so dont lynch me bby. On July 22 2013 23:37 Oatsmaster wrote: rayn is mafia, but you're not gonna bother finding the reasons and you don't want to read back over the thread. But JJD and marv should give you scumreads. Except you don't want to read jack, so maybe you read their thoughts or maybe you don't. And since you don't want to look over the thread, surely you won't go check filters or pages to draw your own conclusions about their reads.I can sense marv's anger flowing through the page. So JJD, whos scum? The two don't match up, imo. | ||
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
On July 23 2013 00:46 FiveTouch wrote: I heard it's not the only post I've made in the thread. You can find my thoughts on oats. Oats - I want to lynch scum. If you're scum, then I want to lynch you. If you're not then I don't. It's up to you to keep yourself from getting lynched regardless of your alignment, and right now you're failing because yes, I want to lynch you for how you're playing right now. It's bullshit and what's worse is that it looks like you're TRYING to infuriate marv. austin - I hope you have thoughts on other players because you literally said nothing about DocH (what is there to say? Why mention him?) and you said nothing about Oats (the lecture is cool an all, but you never say whether or not you would kill that dude) and you said nothing about getmoript (I don't even know what you just said about getmoript, but it says nothign about what you think his aligment is) in that post just now. It reeks of fake contribution and I find you suspicious for it. Make it stop. -VE I didn't say anything about DrH because there's nothing to say about DrH. Either he plays the game and THEN we can talk to/about him, or he replaces out, or whatever. | ||
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
On July 23 2013 01:48 getmoript wrote: I still like lynching TanGeng, especially given that the vote failed. IF he flips town, then it tells us something about DrH. Scum DrH is very unlikely to have returned to thread, been asked to lynch TanGeng by multiple people, and chosen not to do so. Possibly, but really unlikely. Even if he's replacing out, that's direct information about whoever comes in. Can anyone give a reason for why we shouldn't just autolynch Oats tomorrow? Either one works, but still mildly in favor of TG first. | ||
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
On July 23 2013 01:57 getmoript wrote: Do we get something MORE from lynching oats over TG? No Austin. Look at all of what Oats has done. He's refused to interact. He's got this huge test tomorrow and cba to do shit so he's neither focusing on the test to he can contribute tomorrow nor trying to get some good reads in here to make up for his bullshittery. Lynch him. I want to lynch both, and maybe we have vigis that want to shoot, but right now I think that what TG possibly tells us about DrH is more valuable than the satisfaction of lynching Oats. | ||
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
On July 23 2013 02:11 getmoript wrote: We get lulz. But if we don't lynch him, he has to sit in this game and post and vote for another 72 hours. Then we STILL get lulz when we lynch him, AND make him play.Lulz. We get lulz out of lynching Oats. Considering his about of cba attitude, I'll happily take lulz and hound him about the awful play for the next 5-6 games. | ||
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
On July 23 2013 02:51 getmoript wrote: Well, it happened and you won. This time, the no-lynch didn't work out in your favor, but you maybe didn't have the runs, and you'll win again. That was a unique situation.... I had the runs. If I would've noticed I would've bussed you in a heartbeat. Ta da! All is well. Just gotta make the game as enjoyable and productive as you can, and save the rest for postgame. | ||
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
On July 23 2013 05:04 cDgCorazon wrote: You say TG should have been lynched. Is there someone in particular that you're aiming that at? Someone who isn't convinced/didn't try to lynch?Ok so I read everyone's filter and I've come up with a few opinions: -TG should've been lynched D1. Like seriously. His game has been ridiculously scummy and he should've been lynched for it. -Getmoript needs to stop arguing with everyone. While I applaud them for posting a lot and trying to move things forward, they are borderline creating chaos in the game. I'm leaning a bit towards scum with them, but I need to see more because Geript is playing very rash and emotional while WoS is being more moderate and even-keel. -DrH did cause a no-lynch so I think that should against him, but he should not be instantly beheaded for it. That being said, I really do want to hear more from him. -Everyone has been too spammy in their posts, and there has not been enough analysis. Only 2 or 3 players have been providing good analysis on a constant basis. In an environment like this, scum are going to thrive. Everyone needs to step up so scum have nowhere to hide. If anyone wants opinions on specific things, just ask. | ||
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
| ||
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
On July 23 2013 07:11 raynpelikoneet wrote: I think I mostly started it, although one head of getmoript was on board initially iirc. Just read the progression from TanGeng's vote onwards.Who did make the actual case on TanGeng? On July 23 2013 07:17 FiveTouch wrote: What part of the existing wagon got you all hot and bothered?I did this thing I really don't like...it's pretty stupid looking back, but he was lurking most of the day, and when he was called out for not doing anything he was all "What? Look I'm just trying to generate discussion!" Like, no you weren't dude. No one posts with the sole intent of "generating discussion". People have stuff to say when they post, and he defended himself by saying "Dude don't listen to me, I was just trying to generate discussion" That's ultimately why I assented to lynch TG. That and the existing wagon. | ||
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
| ||
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
On July 23 2013 08:37 FiveTouch wrote: There weren't a lot. You came in either actually or fake pissy that we weren't lynching the lurkers you'd pointed out:I had my own reasons - the fact that there was a wagon played a part of my choice, but the reasons I gave were the reasons for my support of the wagon. -VE On July 22 2013 13:56 FiveTouch wrote: None of the leading candidates are scu.my lurkers.😞 You'll regret making me read filters for tonight. This I swear. On July 22 2013 14:28 FiveTouch wrote: You could lynch him, because he didn't scream townie and was weird.I can lynch TG. Nothing screams townie to me in his filter, the "why leave me off ur list" is completely weird. Can we make TG lynch happen? On July 22 2013 14:49 FiveTouch wrote: Then he was lurking but came back, and hadn't looked townie without specifics, ending with him being nullish.TG was mostly lurking, but came into the thread as soon as his name was called and has since put on a pretty poor show of appearing townie. Admittedly this doesn't exclude him being town. I just find it far more likely to come from scum than town in this instance based on how he's presented himself in thread. Look at his defense - he's not even trying to convince me he's scumhunting. He's appealing to my fear of mislynching, exclusively. Like I said - it's nullish, but I'm leaning scum and we've got an established wagon DocH. Plz vote TG I had gone to sleep, but you came in shortly before the lynch and started from there. I'm honestly interested in more specifics on why he was scummy, because the reasons you gave weren't boatloads and were tempered by him not being townie and being nullish leaning scum. | ||
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
| ||
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
On July 23 2013 09:21 FiveTouch wrote: I don't terribly know either. Something different. Well I just don't know what else to say on the matter austin. I gave my reasoning for supporting the wagon, so I'm not really sure what you're after here. -VE | ||
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
On July 23 2013 09:25 FiveTouch wrote: Nah, different stuff about why you voted TG. Not different stuff like not-TG stuff.Well that's what I've been doing this whole cycle - something different - yet you've been harping on my TG reasoning. If you're after "something different" then why not comment on all the "different" I've been doing SINCE then? :/ | ||
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
If TG town, DrH/replacement likely town. If TG scum, DrH could be either. Don't overvalue a TG flip. | ||
| ||