EPTNewbie Mini Mafia XLIV - Page 2
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Umasi
United States1399 Posts
| ||
|
Umasi
United States1399 Posts
On July 13 2013 08:33 Superfluous wrote: While I agree that we should lynch someone if they are super scummy, I'd like to point out that voting for no lynch is an option. Assuming I'm interpreting the rules/setup right, mafia only has 1 kp so there's no immediate motive for lynching such as reducing kp. It may be a stronger play to not lynch and hope that cop(if there is one) gets a turn to check before lynch. It is a risk though because I believe we are not guaranteed to have a cop. Just an idea I wanted to throw out and get your guys' thoughts on. Can I ask what everyone thinks of this? Superfluous feels like the most solid lynch at the moment, to me, as I've stated. Most others have just ignored it does anyone have thoughts on it? | ||
|
Umasi
United States1399 Posts
On July 13 2013 09:22 Rainbows wrote: I think sponge is town for not wanting to take town cred. scum would be all over that ahit. Town cred is not something that you can take or refuse, taking and refusing town cred itself can give reads. | ||
|
Umasi
United States1399 Posts
"meh" and nothing is really coming from it, so why are we beating a dead horse? | ||
|
Umasi
United States1399 Posts
On July 13 2013 09:33 Hurricane Sponge wrote: Since I have to spell it out for the thread (StiM, Umasi....) Try not to defend your town reads. Let them defend themselves. We get more content via a direct conversation, and if scum is barking up the wrong tree, he'll be scared off if three townies rush to someone's defense. It is written: Lo, and let thy scum tunnel; for when they tunnel the town, the Town tunnels into you. What made you assume I thought you were a town read? I don't think I've said anything like that, and I actually don't have you as town (or scum) attacking someones logic is not a claim that someone else is townie, it's just saying "this is stupid" | ||
|
Umasi
United States1399 Posts
On July 13 2013 09:35 jrkirby wrote: "For all we know, THIS could be his scum post." That's exactly what I was trying to get information on. Here was my reasoning: if this is his scum post, then he won't HAVE a real scum post. But it's been long enough that he could've written another one by now, so no point in pushing it anymore. No, this is my second game, kinda. Why is there no point in pushing it? There's no reason to not push it if you think it was scummy, and if you were pushing it for the sake of having something to do, just go do something else. Still, more people, what do you think of Superfluous post and then disappearance? | ||
|
Umasi
United States1399 Posts
Sponge posting his Early Day 1 Conversation Starter." Was it ever a question that his post was to start discussion? And I think what superfluous said was scummy because he gives a soft agree.all? is in soft agreement with the general flow of the thread, then just talks about nothing, then disappears. The post itself, combined with the lack of anything else, is what is scummy as crap. I don't want to overreact too hard to you saying "slight scum read", but if I was truly searching for a neutral place to put my vote on, I wouldn't continue talking about it. | ||
|
Umasi
United States1399 Posts
| ||
|
Umasi
United States1399 Posts
| ||
|
Umasi
United States1399 Posts
It's been two hours since the game began, some people could still be working, etc. The way you popped in, said one thing kinda suspicious, then popped out is what really irks me. Don't apologize and talk about other forums as an excuse, excuses are bad. Reasons are fine, but that didn't feel like a reason to me. We don't need to point out no lynching as an option, because it's BAD No lynching is something that scum would LIKE. I think I said it in the last game I played (too lazy to dig it up,) but the only tool a townie has is their vote, so don't waste it on something like a no lynch. There should always be someone who is objectively "scummiest" that you'd rather vote for than no lynch, have a little confidence. | ||
|
Umasi
United States1399 Posts
aside from you being on a trip or not and that being hard to believe. Although props for thinking that lynching every lynch period is a good thing :D | ||
|
Umasi
United States1399 Posts
am I misunderstanding how the lynch works? If two players have five votes on them, the first one to five gets lynched, am I wrong? Have I horribly misunderstood something? | ||
|
Umasi
United States1399 Posts
So if two players have equal votes, does it actually just become a no lynch? that's fucked up. | ||
|
Umasi
United States1399 Posts
It started to get stagnant and I don't want it to be stagnant t.t | ||
|
Umasi
United States1399 Posts
| ||
|
Umasi
United States1399 Posts
| ||
|
Umasi
United States1399 Posts
(I realize that they're extremely similar, but I think it's a matter of tone) the timing he came in at (right when we brought up lurkers) to be like "I'm trying not to lurk" is just kind of......weird? I think it's out of place and scummy. | ||
|
Umasi
United States1399 Posts
On July 13 2013 10:58 jrkirby wrote: He said he couldn't be in here at the beginning before the game started, right? No real reason to have suspicion on the lurkers yet, just note that they're lurking. The difference here, is that he's ...... like hard to articulate. He is lurking, and pops in to post a comment at such a WEIRD time like, immediately when the conversation mentions lurkers compared to otherwise contributing thoughts. I think Super is the best choice atm, but I'm by no means positive. | ||
|
Umasi
United States1399 Posts
What do you think about my accusations against the other? Rather, Super, what do you think about Nightcat, and Nightcat, what do you think about Super? | ||
|
Umasi
United States1399 Posts
On July 13 2013 12:19 StiMaDDict wrote: This. Pretty much repeating what Xzavier did in the last game, calling everyone retard, was from me being genuinely mad. Overall attitude in my posts and impolite words in them were for the purpose I have stated. Do note: I'm not a good actor and I am not sure whether there was a clear boundary between me being mad because of quotes and spoilers and pretending to be mad at Rainbow. I was not bothered by Rainbow's pressure to put it simply and it is not in my best interest to lie about this. Aside from everything you just said which I really don't care too much about, you just told us you're not a good actor. What made you think it was reasonable to act then? | ||
| ||
