Basterd Mini Mafia - Page 3

On July 02 2013 06:08 JarJarDrinks wrote:
anyone have a vote count?

On July 02 2013 06:12 JarJarDrinks wrote:
because it looked like the only wagons @ the time were WoS, Lazer, and Vayne and I felt that was the best vote. The fuba thing just up and happened out of thin air. I think he's a bad lynch.

On July 02 2013 06:53 JarJarDrinks wrote:
I'm back

Me. Pretty sure my vote's already there.

On July 02 2013 22:56 JarJarDrinks wrote:
Regardless he unvoted so the point is moo.

What is wierd though is how he disappeared during the crucial part of the day. Especially considering he used that exact same reasoning to build his case against Stutters and myself. See if I was like him, I'd start throwing out all these theorys that he couldn't refute about how the mass roleclaim idea scared him away and he purposefully stayed away from the thread.

On July 02 2013 22:59 marvellosity wrote:


In fairness he did say his activity would be spotty on Day 1, Canada day and what have you. I agree with you that it's at best extremely hypocritical with the Stutters thing.

On June 30 2013 12:25 Oatsmaster wrote:
He instantly buddied marv after his miller claim which doesnt 100% confirm marv as town.

Its was like
'Miller claim please'
'im miller'
'k lets win game together marv'

Does anyone else not see that something is wrong?

On June 30 2013 07:06 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Actually no, Stutters' last post makes no sense from town point of view.
##Vote: Stutters

On June 30 2013 07:06 Stutters695 wrote:

I think he's lazy and didn't read the op/didn't comprehend, nbd.

WoS I'm not sure. My French is really rusty so I haven't even really tried to read them but I don't like the fact he's typing in a way clearly everyone won't understand. Can't really judge it this early without just WIFOMing myself for ages.

On July 02 2013 23:30 JarJarDrinks wrote:



In fact, I relooked @ the piggyback accusation and check this out:

Here's my first post that he's referring to:
Am I really piggybacking? I acknowledge oats case barely and then give 3 of my own reasons for thinking rayne was scummy. And also I wasn't attacking lazer and I certainly wasn't associating them as if they were in league. And then again he mentions actvity by saying that I didn't comment on stutters long absence. Like, I commented on stutters actual posts. What could he possibly expect me to say about the fact that he wasn't posting?

@gumshoe - opinion on mass role claiming?

On July 02 2013 00:46 gumshoe wrote:
Jar Jar did you get any flavour text at least XD might help me swallow this.
We're not supposed to I thought but yes I got flavor. Didn't you?

I'm actually worried that I wasn't even supposed to post what I did.
On July 01 2013 09:35 iGrok wrote:
Game continues. Deadline will not be pushed back, as only ~ 2 hours we missed.

To reiterate, the game is now unpaused, please continue. Thanks for working with me to sort this out.

I do need everyone else to go ahead and send in their role PMs, and I have changed one rule in the OP:
It is no longer allowed to post your role pm. You may only post your role name.
I'm thinking that the whole role name means I was only supposed to say "vanilla". Because I feel like the whole mass claim is kinda broken in this setup.

On July 03 2013 00:37 JarJarDrinks wrote:
Finding someones post not town-indicitive <> attacking that person. That's a huge leap to make.


This is just a complete misrepresentation of what happened. I had made my cases against you BEFORE any of the role stuff happened. I didn't take the opportunnity to pounce after you said you were leaving for the day. The majority of what I said was before that. Yes I reposted it for marv and then sure, I started it up again today while you were still gone. Are you saying that I shouldn't push my scumread because he disapeared for the day? I don't know how you can say you "assumed we were on fine terms" when we already had plenty of back and forth and I posted @ least 2 full cases against you.