EPTOn April 09 2013 03:24 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:
And he called out his buddy with me and got him to L-1 if I'm correct?
L-1 = still not lynched. Show nested quote +
On April 09 2013 03:14 Lazermonkey wrote:
On April 09 2013 03:12 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:
I agree with the first part.
The second part not so much. Okay so VE hard-pushed Hopeless. Hopeless flips scum. How does that make VE look bad?
Because he looked for an opportunity to jump over to the Sylencia wagon.On April 09 2013 03:11 Lazermonkey wrote:
On April 09 2013 03:00 Ghor wrote:
You have VE as scumread, shouldn't it make you skeptical that he only soft-pushed hopeless during D1 while seeking for reasons to switch to sylencia?
Opinions please?
I wouldn't say he soft pushed hopeless. He was quite active in pushing hopeless and was AFAIK the first person to vote him. If hopeless does flip scum, however, I do think that it makes VE look worse.You have VE as scumread, shouldn't it make you skeptical that he only soft-pushed hopeless during D1 while seeking for reasons to switch to sylencia?
On April 09 2013 00:39 Ghor wrote:
After this part, I went back through something and I'd like to play some advocatus diaboli with myself.
Before the D1 lynch, VE claimed that he wanted to lynch hopeless, and asked people to convince him to prefer Sylencia over Hopeless. Before slowly moving to Sylencia, he actually called hopeless scummy for something, but never voted for him or pushed his lynch afterwards (and a lot in town wanted to lynch hopeless)
Which is something that I could see VE doing if he's hopeless' scumbuddy. And I don't see how he just completely skips the strong point he's made against hopeless to ask people to win him over to a sylencia lynch.
After this part, I went back through something and I'd like to play some advocatus diaboli with myself.
Before the D1 lynch, VE claimed that he wanted to lynch hopeless, and asked people to convince him to prefer Sylencia over Hopeless. Before slowly moving to Sylencia, he actually called hopeless scummy for something, but never voted for him or pushed his lynch afterwards (and a lot in town wanted to lynch hopeless)
On April 03 2013 06:51 VisceraEyes wrote:
I feel like he got caught with his pants down trying to tiptoe around a risk.nuke lynch. He was indirectly supporting the risk.nuke wagon without adding his vote. Regardless of risk.nuke's alignment, that's a suspicious action out of Hopeless. If at the time he felt like risk.nuke was scum (which his whole association BS is supposing) then there's no reason for him to be indirectly supporting the wagon while trying to start a counter-wagon on someone else.
Furthermore he lied about it in the thread. Observe.
When confronted about his vote on Ghor he says it was to get him to answer his question, but as you can see from the first post, he clearly says that he feels like Ghor should be considered for lynch today. Inconsistent. Scummy.
I feel like he got caught with his pants down trying to tiptoe around a risk.nuke lynch. He was indirectly supporting the risk.nuke wagon without adding his vote. Regardless of risk.nuke's alignment, that's a suspicious action out of Hopeless. If at the time he felt like risk.nuke was scum (which his whole association BS is supposing) then there's no reason for him to be indirectly supporting the wagon while trying to start a counter-wagon on someone else.
Furthermore he lied about it in the thread. Observe.
On April 03 2013 01:32 Hopeless1der wrote:
I think risk is scummy but didn't want the day to end that soon. Also wanted to see if anyone agreed with my assessment of the supposed scumslip.
Ghor is annoying as all hell and his intentions behind voting sylencia do not match with his scum read on risk.nuke. He wants sylencia to commit to some type of a read on risk and when he refuses to do so, calls him scum for it. No where does he validate why this is scummy. Combine that with what appears to be a trolling smurf hellbent on behaving like a caveman, and I think he's a good choice for lynch.
On April 03 2013 01:14 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:
Hopeless...
At this point in time risk had 3 votes on him. You kinda threw some shit at him and called him scummy. What was your intention with this post?
Hopeless...
On April 02 2013 10:49 Hopeless1der wrote:
[quote]
[quote]
Doesn't seem all that legit to me.
[quote]
Also, scumslip in that he knows CC is town.
[quote]
[quote]
Doesn't seem all that legit to me.
[quote]
Also, scumslip in that he knows CC is town.
At this point in time risk had 3 votes on him. You kinda threw some shit at him and called him scummy. What was your intention with this post?
I think risk is scummy but didn't want the day to end that soon. Also wanted to see if anyone agreed with my assessment of the supposed scumslip.
Ghor is annoying as all hell and his intentions behind voting sylencia do not match with his scum read on risk.nuke. He wants sylencia to commit to some type of a read on risk and when he refuses to do so, calls him scum for it. No where does he validate why this is scummy. Combine that with what appears to be a trolling smurf hellbent on behaving like a caveman, and I think he's a good choice for lynch.
On April 03 2013 01:48 Hopeless1der wrote:
My vote on ghor was to get him to answer my bloody question about his stance on risk instead of directing me to his filter.
##Unvote: Ghor
##Vote: risk.nuke
On April 03 2013 01:46 VisceraEyes wrote:
Hopeless if you really felt that way your vote would be on risk.nuke. You're accusing Ghor of being risk's "scumbuddy" because he's not voting for risk. What the hell are you doing? Not voting for risk. You say Ghor is attacking Sylencia in lieu of pushing risk.nuke. What are you doing? Attacking Ghor in lieu of pushing risk.nuke. Your play is wholly and completely contradictory and scummy as sin. Do you have anything to say for yourself?
Hopeless if you really felt that way your vote would be on risk.nuke. You're accusing Ghor of being risk's "scumbuddy" because he's not voting for risk. What the hell are you doing? Not voting for risk. You say Ghor is attacking Sylencia in lieu of pushing risk.nuke. What are you doing? Attacking Ghor in lieu of pushing risk.nuke. Your play is wholly and completely contradictory and scummy as sin. Do you have anything to say for yourself?
My vote on ghor was to get him to answer my bloody question about his stance on risk instead of directing me to his filter.
##Unvote: Ghor
##Vote: risk.nuke
When confronted about his vote on Ghor he says it was to get him to answer his question, but as you can see from the first post, he clearly says that he feels like Ghor should be considered for lynch today. Inconsistent. Scummy.
Which is something that I could see VE doing if he's hopeless' scumbuddy. And I don't see how he just completely skips the strong point he's made against hopeless to ask people to win him over to a sylencia lynch.
Opinions please?
I agree with the first part.
The second part not so much. Okay so VE hard-pushed Hopeless. Hopeless flips scum. How does that make VE look bad?
And he called out his buddy with me and got him to L-1 if I'm correct?
