|
Marshall Islands1474 Posts
On January 23 2013 04:56 sandroba wrote:
I really don't think that's a good comparison, his whole filter in that game are random 3 liners saying XYZ is mafia for w/e reasons. This very last post you quoted look at how he struggles to justify his change of mind and how weak and fake sounding is his explanation. Very much different from this game imo.
His reason for calling me town was "I leak town through my pores"
There is no justification whatsoever
|
Marshall Islands1474 Posts
On January 23 2013 05:01 Toadesstern wrote:
do you know the names of the bgs yet? :/
I don't, no. I've PMed BC about it too.
By the way, bugs called Oats 90-95% town if you care to read the thread, my amphibious friend.
|
Marshall Islands1474 Posts
On January 23 2013 05:03 sandroba wrote:
Can you quote the post he calls you scum previous to that? I really fail to see a reason to find him mafia besides what I pointed out earlier.
Why are you asking me to point out contradictions I've already posted in the thread?
On January 21 2013 11:58 Oatsmaster wrote:
What does 5touch have done to deserve the mayorial position? Is it because all of you agree with his reads? Or think he is town? Cause all I see in his filter is a lot of 1 liners and not much else.
FiveTouch./Everyone sheeping him.
On January 21 2013 22:21 Oatsmaster wrote:
Ok on to FiveTouch,
He is leaking town through his pores, but I dont want to vote for him because day 1 lynch will be a mislynch. Me. However, if he changes his target, I would think about voting for him based on his reads.
From his first filter analysis, I am a bunch of one-liners and not much else. In his second filter analysis I'm leaking town, with no reason given for the change.
Of course it is also possible for a town Oatsmaster to change his mind like this. But the manner in which he did so is quite unnatural.
|
Marshall Islands1474 Posts
On January 23 2013 04:22 sandroba wrote:
I actually reread annul's filter and I found some townie tidbits in it. If you are a vig please shoot into stutters/bke.
I would like you to expand on this.
|
Marshall Islands1474 Posts
On January 23 2013 07:11 sandroba wrote:
I'd rather not till he gives us something. I don't want to look bad for defending scum again =P
No, please do so right now. You said you found tidbits already in his filter, so you can talk about what you found. I'd like to know before he posts too much more, actually.
|
Marshall Islands1474 Posts
On January 23 2013 07:17 sandroba wrote:Show nested quote +On January 22 2013 00:11 annul wrote:
i find it funny that my analyses and accusations have gone completely ignored Show nested quote +On January 22 2013 00:25 annul wrote:On January 22 2013 00:16 Vivax wrote:On January 22 2013 00:11 annul wrote:
i find it funny that my analyses and accusations have gone completely ignored That's cause they suck and everyone knows it . if they are so bad, then attack them. that's what you do when people make shit arguments. that's what i did to yours, after all. but it seems like the rest of the game are afraid to put their nuts on the line. I thought these 2 posts were pretty townie. I would think annul wouldn't mind being ignored as scum.
My experience of annul is that he doesn't like being ignored as any alignment.
|
Marshall Islands1474 Posts
So in an interesting turn of events, Oatsmaster and debears are my bodyguards.
|
Marshall Islands1474 Posts
You're probably incorrect, but this can be gone over during the day.
|
Marshall Islands1474 Posts
Now, as far as I'm aware.
|
Marshall Islands1474 Posts
How do you feel you're playing this game, Oatsmaster? How would you assess your own play so far?
|
Marshall Islands1474 Posts
Time to play the game, debears. No more screwing around.
|
Marshall Islands1474 Posts
On January 23 2013 10:36 gonzaw wrote:
Kind of saw this coming to be honest (except the sandro kill).
Unless some of them were a vig shot.
Oats, you seem to be active, why haven't you addressed my response to your "case"?
Five, could have scum killed you+Toad last night if both debears+Oats were scum and "subbed in"?
Of course, but they would be trading 2 mafia for me.
|
Marshall Islands1474 Posts
On January 23 2013 10:42 debears wrote:
Btw, I say we take the focus of oats and me for today. I'll get nked tomorrow. If Oats is town he will too.
##vote annul
##vote double lynch
no, this isn't good enough. The focus is moreso on you because you are in quite important positions. That means you don't abdicate responsibility for any time at all.
|
Marshall Islands1474 Posts
On January 23 2013 11:00 debears wrote:
5touch, something I was thinking on the nks unless there is some wild vig shot claim
On Djo and JX
I find them extremely odd. They were both on players who seemed to be more null/scum than town imo. They aren't particularly deadly town players with reputations like Gonzaw, Austin
So, this makes me think the scenario for the mafia is one of two things
1) Mafia has a few vets and they want us to have to decide between actual town vets and the scum vets
2) Mafia has multiple lurkers and want us to wifom into lynching our vets
What do you say?
I wasn't aware that this was the reputation of gonzaw and austin.
I don't quite know what happened with the nightkills, but in any case I'm certainly not lynching into bugs or Toad today. With gonzaw my read has been fluctuating.
Mostly I'm curious why you bring this up. Do you think this will help us find mafia? Your entire post looks created to put ideas in people's heads, but I can't tell if it's malicious right this minute.
|
Marshall Islands1474 Posts
On January 23 2013 11:16 annul wrote:
i voted DL and for dearestsnot.
when the time comes, i may move that vote.
You're not going to explain yourself, are you?
|
Marshall Islands1474 Posts
On January 23 2013 07:03 grush57 wrote:
Heyguys I have to go..... don't kill me I am mason, I masoned yamato, I'll be back in a little bit.
grush, why did you choose yamato to mason?
|
Marshall Islands1474 Posts
On January 23 2013 11:21 debears wrote:Show nested quote +On January 23 2013 11:06 FiveTouch wrote:On January 23 2013 11:00 debears wrote:
5touch, something I was thinking on the nks unless there is some wild vig shot claim
On Djo and JX
I find them extremely odd. They were both on players who seemed to be more null/scum than town imo. They aren't particularly deadly town players with reputations like Gonzaw, Austin
So, this makes me think the scenario for the mafia is one of two things
1) Mafia has a few vets and they want us to have to decide between actual town vets and the scum vets
2) Mafia has multiple lurkers and want us to wifom into lynching our vets
What do you say? I wasn't aware that this was the reputation of gonzaw and austin. I don't quite know what happened with the nightkills, but in any case I'm certainly not lynching into bugs or Toad today. With gonzaw my read has been fluctuating. Mostly I'm curious why you bring this up. Do you think this will help us find mafia? Your entire post looks created to put ideas in people's heads, but I can't tell if it's malicious right this minute. One of the best ways to catch mafia is to figure out the type of mafia we are facing no?
The best way to catch mafia is through catching mafia, not speculating on night kills that we can't know the answer to.
|
Marshall Islands1474 Posts
On January 23 2013 11:25 annul wrote:Show nested quote +On January 23 2013 11:18 FiveTouch wrote:On January 23 2013 11:16 annul wrote:
i voted DL and for dearestsnot.
when the time comes, i may move that vote. You're not going to explain yourself, are you? eventually. not now, though.
If you are in fact town, you should be aware that the main focus of the day is unavoidably going to be on you for your posting behaviour and this vote. This would be a complete waste of a day in the situation you are town. Your unwillingness to engage with town, where a majority want to lynch you, is very mafia-oriented. Why would you wish this?
|
Marshall Islands1474 Posts
On January 23 2013 11:35 annul wrote:
as i said i am not worried about being lynched
whether you are worried about being lynched is completely irrelevant, and wasn't my point in the slightest. Please respond to my point (town wasting much of the day on you).
|
Marshall Islands1474 Posts
On January 23 2013 11:46 annul wrote:
i cannot control what the players do. if they want to circlejerk and spend 36+ hours on me, after "already deciding" i am the target, then that is not my fault. its certainly possible to focus on more than one thing at a time.
yes, it is your fault, because you could choose to engage with the town and find mafia.
Why do you refuse out of hand to do this?
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
