Newbie Mini Mafia XXXV - Page 4

On January 14 2013 13:30 Spaghetticus wrote:
Hi guys, glad to be playing as I missed the sign ups. I'm going to go get some food and drink and slog out some catching up. I'm an active player who loves theory and analysis, I believe there are plenty of people in here who can bring you up to date on my meta if need.

On January 14 2013 14:30 Oatsmaster wrote:
Zarepath,
Why did you vote for me.
Explain, in detail.

he didnt share TOWN reads (like some individuals) he shared SCUM reads... remember.. its alot harder for scum to present scum reads as they are openly lying.

He just got too emotional for my taste.

Also you look scummy to me oats.

Mandalor: Pushing against laguerta and trotske acoording to his thinking. Then votes for branig, whos post i really didnt like either. Votes for laguerta after his very weird no lynch thingie. He does get emotional while defending himself, so much that with the first read i instantly thought "scum" in my head. After going through his filter though, i'm quite uncertain.

On January 14 2013 09:48 Trotske wrote:
I think this post is of a really really bad town player who thinks he needs to defend himself with votes on other people and I think that Mandalor is trying to kill a bad townie. So for that and the post Macosta made stating the reasons for lynching him I am going to change my vote.

##Unvote
##Vote Mandalor

On January 13 2013 12:49 shz wrote:

@Oatsmaster:
In parts, the same thing applies to you. If you want to play that aggressive, contribute something useful. Your Mocsta-case is dumb and obviously defensive. Chill out or explain why this is a good way to play (I have no clue how to work with that, I know there are very aggressive (town-) players here, but I have no experience with that).
What I gathered is, that Mocsta plays this way. This does not mean he is town, but neither does it tell you he is scum. He played the same way as town in my game with him.
Your case is dumb and weak, but it's still 24h to our first lynch, so I'll let it slip.If you contiune to play that way, I'll vote for you (or bringa).

Oats actually stepped up a bit. This is not a town read, but at least he is contributing.

On January 14 2013 11:41 Sn0_Man wrote:
##Vote: Mocsta


Lol, wtf.

On December 21 2012 09:42 Mocsta wrote:
(1)
Fellow townies,

I realise its easy to point the finger at Aquanim or even myself; we both developed cases against Spaghetticus.

If you want to question either of us, I suggest action be taken by middle of Night 1. I believe if this matter is not closed sooner than later, it will cloud our ability to constructively look at the sequence of events that led to Spaghetticus.


(2)
We need to consolidate and stick to a battle plan.

I think part of this is absorbing the Day 1 posts before sling accusations at persons.

We need to start questioning peoples motives critically; and understand the town atmosphere at the time of key events.


(3)
For me..

Key Events are:
(1) Reactions when Chromatically began targetting Corazon
(2) Threesr announcing himself in the thread, in the way he did
(3) Reactions to Threesr being top of the vote count
(4) Interplay with FatChunk
(5) Aquanim/Spaghetticus/Myself

Please feel free to add/remove events as you see fit.. I wrote this from recollection.

(4)
I am going to start examining these events with the following goals
(a) Who is pushing these events to occur
(b) Who is not posting at all
(c) Who is joining the bandwagon,but, not adding original thought


When I have had time to answer these questions, I will post again in the thread.

I hope you all too... take a step back.. and do a similar process.

On January 14 2013 14:25 Mocsta wrote:
ok im back.

(1)
As I said before.. I realise its easy to blame me for the hammer vote; I even developed a case against Mandalor.

So ask what you need to ask. Point what fingers you need to point.

Just remember Night 1 is 20 hrs (not 24hrs).

I do not want this action to cloud our ability to constructively look at the what happened Day 1.

On January 14 2013 17:14 shz wrote:
I threatend you for being detrimental to town cause. Whether you are actually scum or not, this behaviour didn't help at all. You stepped it up, but that doesn't mean you are town for the rest of the game. This means you stopped being bad, and at least tried (or look trying) to be helpful.

This post was a shock, as I was on my way to bed thinking Sno lost interesting and is getting modkilled anyway, then he just votes withouth ANY contribution. This was a "Lol, wtf" moment. He later did actually post, but by that time I was in bed.

I stated clearly why I did not push Sno. Because he was an hour away from being modkilled. I will look out for him now, as he also said that we wants to contribute more.

On January 14 2013 17:23 shz wrote:
I did not hoped, I anticipated one. Don't put words in my mouth.[b]

Why waste a vote on a modkilled player, when there is another good target to lynch?
Acid and glurio weren't on their way to a modkill, and I don't have them high on my scum-list atm. As I said, laguerta and Sno. Are mine atm, and as long as this doesn't changes, I'll look at them both.