| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
slOosh
3291 Posts
"None of Palmar, slOosh or Crossfire99 are scum." "None of the following players have anti-town roles at the moment: Palmar, slOosh, Crossfire99" "None of the following players have scum roles at the moment: Palmar, slOosh, Crossfire99" Pick whatever your role works best with, and justify your choice when you can. And results of course. | ||
|
slOosh
3291 Posts
On December 14 2012 04:06 Dienosore wrote: @Blazinghand: "Any time a wagon gains momentum this quickly with no response it's on a townie." is just not true. Have you considered that the wagon was formed so fast that a mafia scumbuddy didn't have time to come to his defense before people were already jumping on? If someone hard defended Fool in this situation, it would have come off to me as incredibly scummy, especially since we were about to see his flip. If Fool had flipped mafia, then his scumbuddy who tried to defend him would have been immediately under the scope. Now that he isn't under direct threat, though, it is interesting to me to see who is coming to his defense... What do you mean by this? Why would scum go through the trouble of defending a buddy who can't be lynched? | ||
|
slOosh
3291 Posts
You say it's a waste of time when it's clear you are focusing your attention on iGrok world, when today's lynch in this world is far from set. Who do you think is scum in this world? | ||
|
slOosh
3291 Posts
| ||
|
slOosh
3291 Posts
I'm guessing if the vote count is correct that someone has power of hidden vote? Let's see what this does: ##Unvote (GreY): Crossfire99 | ||
|
slOosh
3291 Posts
##Vote (GreY): slOosh | ||
|
slOosh
3291 Posts
| ||
|
slOosh
3291 Posts
leaning away from marv pending some results. | ||
|
slOosh
3291 Posts
| ||
|
slOosh
3291 Posts
On December 14 2012 06:09 GreYMisT wrote: GreY's Votecount Palmar (1): Randombum Crossfire99 (2): SlOosh No one to be lynched I voted myself to see if there was a hidden vote on Crossfire or I somehow obtained doublevotes. The ##worship thing was just a guess. | ||
|
slOosh
3291 Posts
I'm not seeing where you are getting at with austin. Are you saying that town austin is usually paranoid about you and therefore would have no doubt included you in the check? I don't see much reason for scum to come in when town has no idea what to do after their main scum lynch was taken away, and then fake claim to offer up lynching guidance the way he did it. I'm leaning Kenpachi as a lurker / unreadable lynch. | ||
|
slOosh
3291 Posts
On December 14 2012 08:06 marvellosity wrote: yes, I would absolutely expect him to include me on a check. In fact you were co-host in LV when I played around with austin in Toad's mason chat, and he's never trusted me since, and we've played many games together. austin is always paranoid of my alignment to the bold, why not? There's no incentive to. The thread was totally stagnant and he could easily feign interest and activity the way he did before hand. It is less likely that he make up a scum claim, and then work to direct the lynch in such a manner when he could have just sat back and let town die. Only reason to direct a lynch is to misdirect it off a scum fellow, and there wasn't anything building up on anyone to need to go to fake claim land. | ||
|
slOosh
3291 Posts
##Unvote ##Vote: kenpachi | ||
|
slOosh
3291 Posts
| ||
|
slOosh
3291 Posts
| ||
|
slOosh
3291 Posts
Is Dieno's play from CT so disparate to be the sole basis of a scum read on him? | ||
|
slOosh
3291 Posts
| ||
|
slOosh
3291 Posts
| ||
|
slOosh
3291 Posts
On December 15 2012 01:23 marvellosity wrote: I did think about it a little more, and I'm not sure I completely accept what you said. The fact there was no reason for austin to do what he did as scum isn't a reason not to. austin loves 'plays'. What good did austin's power do? We ended up policy lynching kenpachi. You say that as if it was solely his fault that Kenpachi was lynched. Motivations are separate from results, and I don't think his motivations are scum driven. He carves out three people who cannot be lynched before him, which limits scum mislynch options and also drives lynch focus on himself if any of these three players look suspect. Plus there is the "let's just lynch him to confirm 3 people". All these things greatly diminish scum's ability to play, and the only upside to this whole thing is maybe "town credit" but that's like bussing your teammate before anyone starts suspecting them gives "town credit". The only way his play makes sense is if crossfire99 is scum, since the lynch was wavering and could have snowballed onto him, but I'm finding that austin's consistency / explanations outweigh that. | ||
|
slOosh
3291 Posts
On December 15 2012 01:45 Dienosore wrote: We really didn't have any good candidates for our lynch, that's why it was so tough. It was more like pick the least worst option. We should start the discussion on who we want swap, and maybe this time have a backup just in case Clarity decides he wants to play interdimensional puppet master again. Any volunteers? Do you think clarity isn't town? | ||
| ||
|
|
Sparkling Tuna Cup
WardiTV 2025
Spirit vs YoungYakov
Rogue vs Nice
Scarlett vs Reynor
TBD vs Clem
uThermal vs Shameless
PiGosaur Cup
WardiTV 2025
MaNa vs Gerald
TBD vs MaxPax
ByuN vs TBD
TBD vs ShoWTimE
OSC
YoungYakov vs Mixu
ForJumy vs TBD
Percival vs TBD
Shameless vs TBD
The PondCast
WardiTV 2025
Cure vs Creator
TBD vs Solar
WardiTV 2025
OSC
CranKy Ducklings
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
