| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
AxleGreaser
Australia1154 Posts
Based on what? Why else emotionally prod me? + Show Spoiler + On December 04 2012 10:29 Rad wrote: 3. Green. I'll let you figure out why (spoiler: it's cause I'm a genius). [QUOTE]On December 04 2012 12:20 Rad wrote: [QUOTE]Don't hold back thinking others are just straight up better than you, waiting for them to make a move.[/QUOTE] Ok... | ||
|
AxleGreaser
Australia1154 Posts
##Vote Rad Are you there? Please id like to talk to you. I have some more questions about intentions. Especially when they began. | ||
|
AxleGreaser
Australia1154 Posts
| ||
|
AxleGreaser
Australia1154 Posts
| ||
|
AxleGreaser
Australia1154 Posts
On December 08 2012 05:19 Rad wrote: Axle did you really just OMGUS me? =/ I dont think so. Is there time we could discuss more interactively before the next lynch time? | ||
|
AxleGreaser
Australia1154 Posts
| ||
|
AxleGreaser
Australia1154 Posts
On December 08 2012 05:40 Kickstart wrote: Yes we have over 24 hours left. Please post some of your reasoning and questions for Rad so that we may all see your reasons and so that Rad may answer the questions when he has time. This is generally how forums work, you post something and then wait for a response so that not everyone is required to be there at the same exact time, you don't wait for everyone to gather in the thread and then start posting. Good if we are going to discuss things, then me discussing it with the person who committed first and hence most to this task is best way for me to be sure, that neither of us disclose more than is necessary to establish a shared understanding. First a theoretical discussion of why it is not currently wise for anyone to just go blah blah blah. If you are town 100% and you don't know who you are dealing with even if you do have a strong read. You should not show all your cards. You should not show cards in an atmosphere where there are arbitrarily long periods to craft an answer. One of the way to limit the depth to which the lies go is to insist the honest exchange happen in real time. While with time it is possible to make up very very deep lies you cant logic your way out of its real time exchange that carries risk for both parties. You drink the wine one molecule at time each. The prisoners dilemma, is a prisoners dilemma, but the iterated prisoners dilemma has tit for tat, I have not verified this, so if a mathematician wishes to object, please tell me. If you were careful each round in the iteration could be for higher and higher stakes and although the temptation to defect grows, the ever increasing possibility of future reward, ensures honesty in perpetuity. Q1. If someone wishes to discuss why we are going to play an iterated prisoners dilemma. Please do so. If you wish to show good faith by adding your own indipendent mathematical reason you have freedom to do so in you own way. A game of math tit for tat anyone? Or is math common language where it is too hard to lie.? We will thus not be playing one round of prisoners dilemma. I am happy to discuss it with either someone I trust so as to gain more trust. I am happy to discuss it with either someone I dont trust so as to solidify that read too. So is someone from my nominated list available? The questions and answering and stuff will go slow then speed up. If you don't like that please explain when all I ask is small amount of real time (now not prepared earlier) to satisfy my need to validate you, you cant give that? So is someone from my nominated list available? | ||
|
AxleGreaser
Australia1154 Posts
| ||
|
AxleGreaser
Australia1154 Posts
| ||
|
AxleGreaser
Australia1154 Posts
| ||
|
AxleGreaser
Australia1154 Posts
| ||
|
AxleGreaser
Australia1154 Posts
In an iterated prisoners dilemma each party takes a small risk, where cooperating has the biggest pay off, but either side could 'defect' at anytime. If this is an actual game, this is the best strategy I know. TBMK there is no extra risk to you than if someone says tell me everything you know about the situation. Indeed there is less. If Kick asks me to disclose stuff if doing so does not get result, that reflects poorly on Kick What I am proposing above minimises the Risk for Kick who is to me (towner than) Rad. If it shuts your head. Just say it hurts my head and play. If the math is wrong i take the blame Ok? Look I put more bet on the table. | ||
|
AxleGreaser
Australia1154 Posts
but then I get the reward for taking the risk of showing how to play this. That is no small risk/reward as apparently this appears to not be what you expected hence common knowledge. | ||
|
AxleGreaser
Australia1154 Posts
| ||
|
AxleGreaser
Australia1154 Posts
That they wish to prosecute using an iterated dilemma as described | ||
|
AxleGreaser
Australia1154 Posts
| ||
|
AxleGreaser
Australia1154 Posts
##vote Nolynch I can see way either could be scum. I dont have the time or the past history to decide. Does anyone else wish to nominate which one of those two we lynch first. We have sufficient time to lynch both, unless anyone else has abetter candidate for today and case they can make. (Do note how little information I disclosed... got here anyway(or an equivalent place). I am suspecting that may not have been the expected mechanic?) | ||
|
AxleGreaser
Australia1154 Posts
I can see way either could be scum. I dont have the time or the past history to decide. Does anyone else wish to nominate which one of those two we lynch first. We have sufficient time to lynch both, unless anyone else has abetter candidate for today and case they can make. Thus if no one has better candidates, the win is by Lynching Both, but choosing one to go first. I not only want to win but win by the biggest safety margin. Does anyone know which we should lynch first? (it is not like you are fosing them just giving anything other than an exactly equal read. To move things along. I have chosen Rad. ##Vote RAD If nothing else earlier I was accused of Lurking... whats being AFK when there is an argument on the table? | ||
|
AxleGreaser
Australia1154 Posts
##Vote RAD | ||
|
AxleGreaser
Australia1154 Posts
| ||
| ||
WardiTV Invitational
Round of 8 & 4 and Finals
Clem vs SKillousLIVE!
herO vs Spirit
TBD vs GuMiho
[ Submit Event ] |
|
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Mong Dota 2 1064Pusan  813actioN  609ggaemo 472firebathero 448BeSt 444Last 264GuemChi 242Larva 226Leta 131[ Show more ] League of Legends Counter-Strike Super Smash Bros Heroes of the Storm Other Games tarik_tv52696 B2W.Neo1515 sgares494 DeMusliM489 Pyrionflax281 RotterdaM245 Fuzer  227Hui .130 mouzStarbuck71 EmSc Tv  23trigger1 Organizations Counter-Strike StarCraft 2 Other Games StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War |
|
AI Arena 2025 Tournament
Replay Cast
Clem vs Zoun
Wardi Open
Monday Night Weeklies
PiGosaur Monday
Replay Cast
SOOP
SKillous vs Spirit
Tenacious Turtle Tussle
The PondCast
Replay Cast
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
