EPTyes but how do you know yamato77 is town?
how do you know he is on your team.
There is a 6/8 chance you are a town but I am currently checking out what you do.
Newbie Mini Mafia XXXII - Page 4
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
AxleGreaser
Australia1154 Posts
yes but how do you know yamato77 is town? how do you know he is on your team. There is a 6/8 chance you are a town but I am currently checking out what you do. | ||
|
AxleGreaser
Australia1154 Posts
What if he is scum? Are you not concerned he might be scum? Lastly is he a high town read from you? or is hea quite scummy read from you? GO | ||
|
AxleGreaser
Australia1154 Posts
ooops typo Ok that makes a little sense, | ||
|
AxleGreaser
Australia1154 Posts
| ||
|
AxleGreaser
Australia1154 Posts
On December 05 2012 00:30 Oatsmaster wrote: No, I wasnt providing advice on how he could look more town, I was giving a suggestion on more effective/accurate ways to win the game as town. If he is scum, it doesnt matter. I am concerned that he is scum. HOWEVER, it doesnt really affect much BECAUSE if you know that someone is scum, you just ignore them. Currently I have a slight town read on yamato, however he seems to be acting differently as opposed to last game. Probably because he wants to improve like me, but you never know. commenting on bits of that. "however he seems to be acting differently as opposed to last game." didnt you say you thought we should hunt for scum that way? "If he is scum, it doesnt matter." it matters to me. The way I catch scum is when they do things i think they should not. You were getting yamato to behave in way that you think is more pro town by hunting for scum in a more 'normal way' How am I meant to find him if you give advice on how to act like the rest of us? | ||
|
AxleGreaser
Australia1154 Posts
"however he seems to be acting differently as opposed to last game." didnt you say you thought we should not hunt for scum by looking at meta and use more normal means. Why are you now looking at meta? | ||
|
AxleGreaser
Australia1154 Posts
BTW. Thank Yam for suggesting what I should do. | ||
|
AxleGreaser
Australia1154 Posts
On December 05 2012 00:30 Oatsmaster wrote: No, I wasnt providing advice on how he could look more town, I was giving a suggestion on more effective/accurate ways to win the game as town. If he is scum, it doesnt matter. I am concerned that he is scum. HOWEVER, it doesnt really affect much BECAUSE if you know that someone is scum, you just ignore them. Currently I have a slight town read on yamato, however he seems to be acting differently as opposed to last game. Probably because he wants to improve like me, but you never know. commenting on bits of that. "however he seems to be acting differently as opposed to last game." didnt you say you thought we should hunt for scum that way? "If he is scum, it doesnt matter." it matters to me. The way I catch scum is when they do things i think they should not. You were getting yamato to behave in way that you think is more pro town by hunting for scum in a more 'normal way' How am I meant to find out that yamato is scum if you give him advice on how to act like the rest of us?[/QUOTE] | ||
|
AxleGreaser
Australia1154 Posts
Ok I am off to bed | ||
|
AxleGreaser
Australia1154 Posts
On December 05 2012 07:25 Mr. Cheesecake wrote: Why has the discussion stagnated so? @Everyone What are your opinions of Kick/Yamato/Oats, those in the spotlight? What do you guys see about others as well? Just anything, lol. Some scummer reads etc. Interested in particularly hearing from Sylencia. I had an idea last night before I went to bed. But as I was still not quite awake enough I slept on it to see if today it felt wrong. It still reads feels the same as it did last night. those in the spotlight? getting the game they deserve. Interested in particularly hearing from Sylencia. I have not checked but it might be hard to do that. So anyway i will poke around the thread, for a while I was going to suggest the auspicious time of 12:00 here in oz but I want until 1.00 here in oz which 1:45 from this post. It would be pleasant if at that time we had some kind of quorum. Either that or if no one is here at that time I will speak to thin air just the same. | ||
|
AxleGreaser
Australia1154 Posts
On December 04 2012 10:26 Arnarnion wrote: Alright 1) I haven't played a game yet, but I did obs XXXII 2) I am of the opinion that lynches should be saved for top scum reads and that removing inactive players might not be as productive for town as it is for scum, since were just doing their work for them. 3)(Oats)- Don't give me none of that pie or cheesecake, the only true dessert is ice cream. (CC)- Green. I think saying that again, would be past superfluous. | ||
|
AxleGreaser
Australia1154 Posts
| ||
|
AxleGreaser
Australia1154 Posts
On December 02 2012 09:48 Arnarnion wrote: /in hypothesis google Arnarnion yep thought so. On December 02 2012 11:36 AxleGreaser wrote: /in Why do I suddenly feeel nervous? because apparently I had reason to be. I was sticking my had in the mouth of friendly dragon. and wondering if it would bite it off. I was sad  though because aqua really did ant to come back here when he has the time.and if I made bad karma Thats why I nearly walked away without ever posting here once. Oh well its done now. | ||
|
AxleGreaser
Australia1154 Posts
On December 04 2012 01:14 marvellosity wrote: except it says filters and there are no filters :< I don't know what or who said filters when? So if that is a sad face, perhaps asking a question would make it? :> ............... No perhaps I misunderstood there must be lies. So I am treating this as no question to answer as I have multiple interpretations. | ||
|
AxleGreaser
Australia1154 Posts
On December 05 2012 10:09 Mr. Cheesecake wrote: Axle, I have no friggen clue what the hell you're trying to say, ever. Seems like half of the stuff in your posts are randomly red for no reason. I think those bits are important. For instance "1) I haven't played a game yet, but I did obs XXXII" XXXII is this game. Playing and obsing it is bit ? Do note however, I am not complaining about anything at all. So far this game has been great. If I am correct. It is game setup that I dreamed of making for you guys one day. Apparently you guys have thought of most things first. So far this game has been great. As i think I have solved for the win condition. but to do that I would need to present my case, which I will do in about half an hour. So far I find no evidence incompatible with my case. | ||
|
AxleGreaser
Australia1154 Posts
Save your energy. The only evidence I will consider is the evidence I found before I indicated, I had any idea what the solution was. | ||
|
AxleGreaser
Australia1154 Posts
On December 05 2012 09:17 AxleGreaser wrote: I had an idea last night before I went to bed. But as I was still not quite awake enough I slept on it to see if today it felt wrong. It still reads feels the same as it did last night. those in the spotlight? getting the game they deserve. Interested in particularly hearing from Sylencia. I have not checked but it might be hard to do that. So anyway i will poke around the thread, for a while I was going to suggest the auspicious time of 12:00 here in oz but I want until 1.00 here in oz which 1:45 from this post. It would be pleasant if at that time we had some kind of quorum. Either that or if no one is here at that time I will speak to thin air just the same. real soon now i will present a case that I believe solves the game it solves the game in the sense that it solves it for my win condition. In my win condition everybody who is on my team wins. btw that would be you, as in anyone and everyone who read this post. ----- I have strong technical hunch that some people cant as sometimes when I open multiple windows here the game looks different. I have not tried to verify that so I could be wrong. If thats wrong or you don't understand just ignore it. | ||
|
AxleGreaser
Australia1154 Posts
the evidence considered for the case will only be from before that post (or there abouts) | ||
|
AxleGreaser
Australia1154 Posts
On December 05 2012 10:57 Rad wrote: @jidolboy Ahh, gotcha. Would you mind sharing your scum read? Both you and Sylencia have now mentioned that you have a scum read of some sort, and both of you seem to feel the need to hide it. Any reason you're holding back? That would be the case. I am sorry I will not be answering more questions that are put after that post either. What I need to do is finish reading the thread from before that post. | ||
|
AxleGreaser
Australia1154 Posts
On December 04 2012 21:43 AxleGreaser wrote: This post contains content on its own so that does not get lost in the last one. The last post drew a conclusion from a ridiculous small amount of data. That is not all the data it is based on just all that was quoted. A lesson I learned along time ago when dealing with potential liars is never show all your cards to them. The majority of people here are town. I, state that, I think my optimal play is to show a large fraction of what I know. [........] Finally, hence Importantly I do not reach final conclusions no matter what the English implies. | ||
| ||
