EPTI will not be modkillllll....
Mattchew the sexy has been modkilled!
Acme Mini Mafia, Inc
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
I will not be modkillllll.... Mattchew the sexy has been modkilled! | ||
|
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
Release comes in to the thread with this post and edit On November 01 2012 09:00 Release wrote: to everyone: Are we asking Millers or Masons to claim? prplhz (the origin of the idea) said millers and now kushmasta has asked for masons to claim (although he does avoid saying mason). I have to say already that kshmasta is looking scummy. Since i don't see the advantage of a miller claim, i'd like to know why a miller should claim (from both prplhz and hope in particular). I'd also like to hear from kushmasta why you avoided saying mason. On November 01 2012 09:01 Release wrote: EBWOP: those are three separate ideas, although kushmasta is looking scummy for both trying to change who should claim and being deceitful about it. He accuses kushmasta of... honestly i dont know... especially after he asks about the discussion being about masons or millers. Kush misread the thread / roles being discussed and thought millers = masons... calling him scum for this is the biggest stretch i have seen in a while. there is no way anyone with any level of reading comprehension would draw these conclusions from kush's posting and reading the thread around it release is trying to look like he is scum hunting by skewing kush's words from the thread. Zealos is probably scum too. He immediately jumps into the thread (after promising to be active this game) with 2 posts that are setup talk and literally basically say nothing. On November 01 2012 09:06 Zealos wrote: I don't like the idea of masons claiming at all? o.O On November 01 2012 09:09 Zealos wrote: I highly doubt a mafia would get so aggressive right off the bat imo. Just seems like dumb reasoning, is all. The thing is though, he jumps on the fact that masons are being talked about. Other than Kush mis-reading the thread there has been no talks of masons claiming. He then follows this with a really soft defense of release saying that mafia wouldnt be that aggressive. A. I would hardly call release's posting aggressive, trying to paint it as aggressive is deceptive and super scummy. B. Scum can be aggressive and passive all the time, but he is trying to paint aggressiveness as townie, while giving that trait to release ##vote Release | ||
|
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
|
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
On November 01 2012 10:40 Acrofales wrote: Zealos is being Zealos. I have nothing much to say about him yet. can you expand and explain this to me like im 5 | ||
|
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
|
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
On November 01 2012 10:59 Acrofales wrote: That is correct. @Release: I could vote for you, but there's no point yet. Why the rush with over 40 hours left in D1? As I said at the top of that post: I don't like your followup and can easily read a scum motive into it. However, it's D1 and tunneling on one player is not the way I like to play D1 (it leads to a mislynch 90% of the time). yeah im voting because of the opposite, often on day 1 town loses focus and direction for its lynch and ends up in a last minute scramble. I trust my early reads pretty heavily so it will take a lot to move my vote right now | ||
|
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
|
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
a mafia is the key word(s) that defines it as a general read | ||
|
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
|
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
|
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
|
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
|
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
|
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
|
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
Yeah I wanna hear a lot more... Acro and muso your partners need to claim there is too much question involved in what seems to be an attempt at a "setup confirmed" lynch plan | ||
|
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
|
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
|
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
On November 02 2012 09:23 kushm4sta wrote: I think it is the natural tendency of mafia to accuse people on things that they themselves are guilty of. As mafia you are hyper aware of your own mistakes and that gives the mind a convenient go to for what to look for in other people. Mattchew hypothetically accuses release of something that he is actually also guilty of! Release jumps on me for a stupid reason. Mattchew jumps on Realease for a stupid reason. So essentially you are accusing him because of bad "reading comprehension." That is kind of the same thing he accuses me of though. Then this: Are your early reads right a lot? Most people haven't even talked yet at this point, but you overblow this release case to the point where you already know who you want to lynch. I think Mattchew was being hypocritical and overzealous in his attack on Release. fos mattchew Someone with a meta read, is Mattchew usually this decisive for weak reasons? are you thick? I think release is scum because he skewed what you said and jumped on the opportunity to do so to call you scum... His reasoning is so flawed... I also believe I said that there was no conceivable way his reading comp was that bad, meaning I believe he did this intentionally | ||
|
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
|
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
##vote muso | ||
|
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
|
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
On November 01 2012 11:20 Release wrote: Do not use this post later to claim that i am shifting attention off myself. I acknowledge that I am under suspicion. So in the flurry of comment regarding the claiming, we seem to have dismissed the possibility of enacting a Lynch-all-liars policy. The main con i see if we do enact it is that we can't pull use fishing for reactions as freely. The main pro, however, is that people can't claim to be fishing for reactions. Another consequence is that more information is in the thread. Both town and mafia know more about true intentions and can react accordingly. Personally, i am against such a policy because people can very easily say "i changed my mind" and blame/vindication will tend to be imposed base on a town/scum flip. On November 02 2012 11:27 Release wrote: ##Vote: Muso con-tra-dick-shun | ||
|
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
On November 03 2012 10:50 Release wrote: You expected me to deliberately not vote what appeared to be very scummy behavior? Hell, i could have chosen accro too if i wanted to lynch-all-liars. I chose Muso for the scummy manner in which he lied. His "very scummy behavior" was lying... | ||
|
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
|
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
Risk idk about because this is how he always plays.. Prp I felt off about and its real weird that prp would have a town read on me and then prom would come into the game knowing prp's thoughts and alignment and disregard that I am posting from my phone I have been traveling to friends to get on a comp (I'm in nj with no power) | ||
|
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
should i die Acro - I feel is townie, but i think his scum is better than my town so be on alert I feel that Risk plays like this as town. kush is kush, and it would take serious scum balls to say a lot of the shit he has thrawn has shared a lot of the same thoughts and thought processes that i have had... he is one of my stronger town reads release earned some serious mutha fucking town points with me when he answered to my accusation by explaining his thought process and not taking the easy way out. I would not lynch him as of now I think hopeless has a pretty decent chance of flipping scum. His posts are long but usually contain a lot of summary with very little opinion on a lot of things, and barely any thought process sharing Darthpunk could also be scum, he's pretty quick to hop on any little "easy to lynch" reason presented in the thread. He doesn't seem to be actively scum hunting either i dont have time to read into draz even though i opened his filter or anyone else | ||
|
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
|
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
On November 18 2012 10:23 DarthPunk wrote: Props to debears, Kier and marv for figuring shit out in the obs thread.  what about the real game? | ||
|
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
On November 04 2012 07:05 Mattchew wrote: prom can you point out where i said that in the past... i simply dont remember writing that should i die Acro - I feel is townie, but i think his scum is better than my town so be on alert I feel that Risk plays like this as town. kush is kush, and it would take serious scum balls to say a lot of the shit he has thrawn has shared a lot of the same thoughts and thought processes that i have had... he is one of my stronger town reads release earned some serious mutha fucking town points with me when he answered to my accusation by explaining his thought process and not taking the easy way out. I would not lynch him as of now I think hopeless has a pretty decent chance of flipping scum. His posts are long but usually contain a lot of summary with very little opinion on a lot of things, and barely any thought process sharing Darthpunk could also be scum, he's pretty quick to hop on any little "easy to lynch" reason presented in the thread. He doesn't seem to be actively scum hunting either i dont have time to read into draz even though i opened his filter or anyone else | ||
|
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
On November 18 2012 14:13 Hopeless1der wrote: I guess its pretty obvious why you had to go Matt. but i think that post was after the deadline of atleast you submitting your kills :/ | ||
| ||
