EPTThe only thing I sheeped you on was risk because you made a good case and he was already looking scummy to me,
I thought iamp perfect might be scum but I looked at his filter and I changed my mind.
Liquid City Mafia - Page 10
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
The only thing I sheeped you on was risk because you made a good case and he was already looking scummy to me, I thought iamp perfect might be scum but I looked at his filter and I changed my mind. | ||
|
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
| ||
|
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
| ||
|
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
| ||
|
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
Anti town yeah sure (more specifically anti you). that they were. But I dont see what I would gain from it as scum? | ||
|
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
You suspect me and iamp and shiao, but what about his scum reads? Dont they seem even scummier to you? | ||
|
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
| ||
|
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
On October 07 2012 09:37 DarthPunk wrote: LoL. Why would you even bother asking Hapa anything? Beacuse if I was in hapa's shoes I would have a hard time answering that question, deciding if i should give a scum or town. I'm glad you actually clarified your case on me because I want everyone to see how dumb it is. It in itself is incredibly WIFOM. I could see the motivations for town or scum behind it. | ||
|
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
| ||
|
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
At the time there was nothing else going on, so this is why I felt more comfortable shitting up the thread. It's not a town motivation that caused me to wifom you. It's a kush motivation. | ||
|
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
+ Show Spoiler + my confirmed scum thread shitting in newbie 28 was way more effective than yours, and I did it without spamming. #1 you are violating a game rule: no spamming. Just the mod is too lazy to enforce it. #2 if you post a million things that obviously aren't serious then you aren't confusing town, you are just making it harder to read through the thread, which I suspect most people only do once anyway. Confusing town is way more valuable. | ||
|
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
+ Show Spoiler + On October 02 2012 12:21 BlackMamba24 wrote: Day 1 Vote Count Shady Sands (7): kingjames01 (2): keirathi, kushm4sta (1): VisceraEyes (1): Talismania, Mementoss (0): austinmcc (3): kreb, mkfuba07, BloodyC0bbler risk.nuke (1): Sharrant Node (7): Marvellosity, VisceraEyes, austinmcc, kushm4sta, Z-Boson, iamperfection, BroodKingEXE, The following players have not voted: AdmiralAardvark, SlOosh, Shady Sands, Friendly reminder to use the Voting Thread to have your vote counted. It's a little under 1 hour till deadline. Currently, Node is set to be lynched. (Tie with Shady Sands, he acquired 7 before Shady) We now know that this was a bandwagon created by scum and directed at scum. At this point it's 7 for node and 7 for Shady. Scum are really scared right now. Z-boson is the first scum to leave the bandwagon. He moves his vote to Coag, someone who isn't even a candidate for d1 lynch. (He thinks it makes him look less suspicious than switching to shady who he knows will flip town.) On October 02 2012 12:30 Z-BosoN wrote: Allright, there he is. I've decided that I will not give a shit about what people are saying regarding meta and choose whoever I think is scummiest and makes a better lynch. I'm going with coagulation because of what I've stated earlier on him. He hasn't posted anything useful so far and flows along with content-less posts. Shows no real interest in scum hunting and his association with me on shady sands is ridiculous, as if he is incapable of reading. ##Unvote ##Vote Coagulation Well not giving a shit about meta is quite dumb. Also he moves from someone who looks actually scummy to someone who's meta points to null. At that time austin (confirmed town) posts about some of the resistance to the node lynch. He singles out coag, z-boson, and sloosh. Note that all 3 of these guys still look quite scummy. On October 02 2012 12:36 austinmcc wrote: + Show Spoiler + I can't stay up for deadline. My vote is staying on node. In the same way that some may have concerns about the way votes are coming in, look at some of the votes going elsewhere, or admonitions to go elsewhere: On October 02 2012 12:17 Coagulation wrote: Everyone keep your votes on shady sands. Node bandwagon looked scummy as fuck and only makes shady look even scummier. Wagon looks scummy. Nothing about node himself, nothing about node's posts On October 02 2012 12:30 Z-BosoN wrote: Allright, there he is. I've decided that I will not give a shit about what people are saying regarding meta and choose whoever I think is scummiest and makes a better lynch. I'm going with coagulation because of what I've stated earlier on him. He hasn't posted anything useful so far and flows along with content-less posts. Shows no real interest in scum hunting and his association with me on shady sands is ridiculous, as if he is incapable of reading. ##Unvote ##Vote Coagulation Dude who randomly mentions Node On October 02 2012 12:33 slOosh wrote: Guh didn't realize how much time I actually take to read. Between Node and Shady Sands I'm leaning Shady. With a total lack of follow through after his troll antics, he has disrupted early day discussion and dropped off. Not lynching him today on the basis of a potential modkill is stupid - he could easily trade his life for hurting day 2 discussion as well and he might not even be lynched. The nature of the Node lynch is really strange. Reason enough to lean the former. ##Vote: Shady Sands Node lynch is "strange." Is Node himself scummy? Are Node's posts scummy? Paraphrasing austin: COAG discredits the bandwagon without even mentioning the scum was being bandwagoned. Z-BOSON previously randomly referenced forgettable node post 5 hours after the fact. SWOOSH also talks about the "nature" of the bandwagon. OFC he thinks it's off, because he knows his scumbuddies orchestrated it. In summary: more pressure on z-boson please. | ||
|
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
The only time you give your scumreads is when someone asks you for them and you give them with barely any explanation. VE who is an obvious pick. BC because he's afk. Why aren't you tunneling people like you usually do? | ||
|
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
On October 07 2012 11:33 Coagulation wrote: I dont know whos scum yet want me to fake it for you? nah I can empathize with that position. | ||
|
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
i am bad at this game just like you | ||
|
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
Soft Defense of Playbad Vets This group is being FOSed by a lot of people (including me) just because they have very low activity and they are known to be good and experienced mafia players. This group definitely includes but is not probably not limited to: BloodyC0bbler, Keirathi, VisceraEyes To use their inactivity as a scumtell I think is unfair. Here is why: There are too many of them to all be scum. Therefore something else must be causing vets to afk
If you read their activity before they start lurking, it's mostly decent and what you'd expect. I propose we focus on scum targets with more evidence than "they usually play better." | ||
|
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
DPs case against you boils down to a few points: Your attitude is aggressive. You didn't scumhunt enough (I would say is due to general inactivity). You didn't explain your vote on KJ enough. (I think you explained as much as most people and more than me.) You left your vote on KJ even though he wasn't going to be lynched. You explain your vote for marv. You say you are slow when voting for marv. Your increased level of not giving a shit. None of which are scumtells IMO. So now your method of scumhunting is saying "why don't you think I'm scum?" #1 this line is caused by guilt for inactivity #2 also it is in itself a way of scum hunting in which you don't have to pay close attention. You just have to scan for your name to be mentioned. | ||
|
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
@broodkingexe Why do you have a scumread on Matt? Is it just because he's been afk and hasn't responded? | ||
|
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
1 me fucking with you and 2 me fucking with you | ||
|
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
There are so many afk vets they are not all scum. Probably at least one is scum but they have contributed so little that it's impossible to tell which. These guys are probably quite good at playing mafia. Something as obvious as afking is not a scumtell. That is why I think we should focus on another group of potential mafia. ##fos risk, z boson, coag, sloosh | ||
| ||
