|
Oh, missed that Toast said he would be busy until tomorrow. mbad
On February 09 2012 08:55 BaronFel wrote:
@Nisani
[...]
I don't see how trying to be impartial is a bad thing? We could've tried to play this game with random lynchings and gone with our gut, but most people are trying to logically post. If I was impartial, that would mean I would look over someones argument just cause I didn't agree with them at the start...
Funny enough, that was the main reason I was looking at Sinensis, I didn't think he was logical/partial enough.
?? This doesn't make sense at all. I think you don't know what impartial means..? "Going with our gut" =/= partiality, and being against someone's character =/= impartiality... Nisani is referring to the fact that you haven't been making hard stands on people, do you have anything to say about that?
Nisani's point is funny though:
On February 08 2012 12:53 Nisani201 wrote:Show nested quote +On February 07 2012 23:02 BaronFel wrote:
After looking through Nisani201's filter, I think he's rather suspicious (short posts, didn't explain his decisions much). He's probably my main suspect at this point.
Mderg seems like a townie to me, or at least rather logical.
EchelonTee is rather aggressive, but I don't think that makes him more suspicious than Nisani201 at this point.
gotta go to work, but I'll be back later tonight Also make me think he's scum. He tries to be as impartial as possible with everything.
Doesn't BaronFel's post look a lot like:
On February 08 2012 06:58 mderg wrote:
Just a general not that well reasoned list of reads:
Bluelightz IMO rather town than scum, not safe to assume, though
EchelonTee IMO suspicious but no serious suspicion
TheToast IMO rather town than scum but not confirmed
Nisani201 IMO rather scum than town, my first target
[UoN]Sentinel IMO hard to imagine as scum
BaronFel IMO not cleared my feeling tells me that he´s town
prplhz pretty much confirmed town
I really want to see your case on Sentinel, but your case on BF is just saying he is newbie lurker, a counterpart of how you're an experienced/abrasive lurker. Take your stance on Sentinel, if you actually have one.
|
On February 10 2012 00:23 Bluelightz wrote:Right now, BaronFel could easily be Town, the way he post's his opinions make me think he is town for now. Sentinel, could be town as well, looking at this post is what makes me have mixed opinions on him. Show nested quote +On February 07 2012 07:14 [UoN]Sentinel wrote:On February 07 2012 06:34 prplhz wrote:
You the last scum [UoN]Sentinel? I wish I were. Maybe then I could have some fun. That's the end of it. I will be available somewhere around 3 hours before the deadline and be here for aroun d30 minutes maybe, but can't be sure :/
do you realize that saying everyone is green is GOOD for mafia?? are you intentionally or unintentionally avoiding the topic of who you want to lynch.
|
Sentinel/Nisani are on chopping black atm, both are accusing each other, yet neither have anything substantial to say about it. Guess no one cares about this game n e moar
On February 09 2012 12:50 Nisani201 wrote:Show nested quote +On February 09 2012 08:09 prplhz wrote:
@Nisan201 Why don't you make any sense at all?
Things you've said that do not make sense in my brain:
1: prplhz is a good scumhunter. I doubt you believe this because it's not true. I'm like maybe mid gold league and I've never played well in any game you've been in and I've never seen you in any observer QT.
2: You have not been vocal or decided to have any thread presence because 1, yet you don't really act like you truly believe 1. You didn't support me in ANYTHING this whole game. I would actually have pushed you day2 but I thought it would be weird to shoot sinani206 and then push Nisani201. No idea where I got this idea from.
3: You only ever do anything when called out. Your cases on BaronFel and [UoN]Sentinel are like, meh, you could have pushed those at any point in this game because they took you maybe 2 minutes to write up. I've seen you do a lot better but in this game you don't seem to really give a damn.
And can't you at least make up some bullshit reason for not giving us sinani201? He was so obvious and you've played with him more and know him better than anybody else here. I had to read through of his games (I didn't count SEVEN FUCKING TEEN by the way) night1 but you were in all those, why didn't you give us sinani201? 1. You landed a vig shot on Sinani on N1. 2. This is a defect in my town play. Look at any of my games and you'll see that it's natural for me to be somewhat lurky/less vocal. 13. See #2 2I will be writing an analysis on Sentinel later today (or tomorrow if I don't have enough time). I agree that I haven't been as active as I should be but that will change.
1. It's true that you always play lurky and unvocal; however in this scenario you haven't really been making sense, along with lurking. In the games I read, you facilitate discussion by prodding inactives/people making no sense, ask probing questions, etc. You did that for D1 a bit, but tapered off severely D2. It gives off a huge vibe of "townies getting lynched, idgaf".
2. being lurky doesn't mean you're bad at scumhunting; in MLP Mafia you busted out a huge, correct analysis when the time came for it; are you unable/unwilling to do so now?
I'm going to be back home 4 hours before the deadline. hopefully ppls start making sense by then.
|
well crap. 20 mins to deadline. not like I fell asleep or whatever. reading, will post final thoughts at -10 mins.
|
|
|
Sentinel didn't you say you had a "final defense"? or something? was that it?
|
what happens if no one has a majority?
##Unvote: [UoN]Sentinel
##Vote: No Lynch
|
I DON'T KNOW MAN why didn't you label your posts with who you were addressing. I feel like I'm cramming for a final exam or some shiz.
|
##Unvote: No Lynch
##Vote: Bluelightz
|
|
|
nisani/bluelightz/baron awol.
is no lynch terrible at not D1? We have to hammer bluelightz or BF now??
|
less than one minute, prplhz is nolynch now WORST SCENARIO EVER
|
##Unvote: Bluelightz
##Vote: BaronFel
|
##Unvote: BaronFel
##Vote: Bluelightz
|
|
|
OMFG PRPLHZ YOU WERE 1 SECOND TOO LATE AHHHHHHHHHHHHH
|
On February 10 2012 12:02 TheToast wrote:Show nested quote +On February 10 2012 12:01 prplhz wrote:
THIS IS SO BAD
THIS IS SO SO SO SO BAD
THIS IS THE WORST THING I HAVE EVER SEEN HAPPEN ON THIS FORUM Dude calm down before you get yourself banned from the Mafia forum. If we want to win this though, we have to use Night 3 to agree on exactly who is Mafia. They still can only kill one tonight. However I have the strangest feeling that Bluelightz and BaronFel will both still be with us. FML.
toast it's partially his fault, vote right after deadline, I think he's also condemning himself with that post. we can't keep subtly or un-subtly bashing each other, it causes teh disunity.
|
On February 10 2012 12:01 [UoN]Sentinel wrote:
I POSTED MY FINAL DEFENSE FOR NOTHING
=/ I feel like an idiot for drawing it out of you, but your veiled blue claim was pretty obvious when you said "I have my final defense ready if it comes to it". I was never planning on hammering you for that reason, unless you were last man standing or some weird wifom nonsense happened.
|
On February 10 2012 12:01 redFF wrote:
TOO LATE BRO
epic troll ;(
i'm at fault for the (mostly) terrible day. said I would post meat on multiple occasions but didn't do shit. I'm a fckover yayaya
|
On February 10 2012 11:58 TheToast wrote:
prplhz and ET, it's up to you guys now to decide what happens.
Believe it or not, it was your guys' arguments that moved me away from looking at Bluelightz...
Bluelightz wasn't actively dangerous which is why I stopped looking for a second. But he's essentially been lurking all game, while posting lists/blue speculation to make it look like he's not. my #1 scum prospect
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
