If you didn't notice I spent a while trying to figure out if tyrran was actually scum, 2 hours. (I did some things in between as well)
some free time doesn't mean that I will be spending the entire day playing this game.

Grackaroni

United States9856 Posts

January 13 2012 00:28 GMT

#1508

Well now you're just seeing what you want to see...

Grackaroni

United States9856 Posts

January 13 2012 01:19 GMT

#1519

I think it was in response to Zephirdd's theory about him.
RoL has gone long enough delaying scumhunting, I think he's scum.
##Vote: RebirthofLegend

Grackaroni

United States9856 Posts

January 13 2012 01:21 GMT

#1521

Wait why does it say that it is dusk? has day not begun yet??

Grackaroni

United States9856 Posts

January 13 2012 01:33 GMT

#1523

On January 13 2012 10:31 Jackal58 wrote:

Show nested quote +

What?

nevermind. It said it was dusk earlier in the zbots vote count area (instead of night/day), it must just take a little time to setup.

Grackaroni

United States9856 Posts

January 13 2012 15:18 GMT

#1547

I don't think BH is nearly as pro-town as people think he is.

On January 08 2012 08:56 Palmar wrote:

Show nested quote +

Erandorr has done nothing this game that warrants me giving him the "I'll rather no-lynch than lynch a townie" treatment, however, despite risk's last effort, do you not think he overreacted to you calling him out? Claiming that plan that literally was nothing but "I'm gonna post and see what people say", do you think he is honestly under the impression that this "plan" was so pro-town and vital, that it justifies attacking someone?

I actually thought risk.nuke was decent at the game.

But to answer your question, I'll be around for another half an hour or so, and there is no reason to protect erandorr.

On January 08 2012 09:02 Blazinghand wrote:

Show nested quote +

No this is wrong Erandorr has actively come to the thread and hustled us. Why on earth are his actions remotely acceptable

There have been times in this game where BH has blatantly not read the thread or is misinterpreting posts.
He likes to focus in on people who he feels are useless such as his case for Bluelightz (which only showed that he was anti-town) his case on erandorr (he ignores the meta which only proves that he is inactive and doesn't want to be modkilled) and finally his case on RoL (he's not scumhunting, his plan looks shitty)
You are not actually scumhunting, you just lock in on people acting anti-town and tunnel them for the rest of the day to make yourself look good. you grab all their quotes and make a "case" but in reality it actually resembles what bluelightz' cases look like.
Your play is legitimately worse than in Student.
I am still suspicious of how long it took RoL to start scumhunting but at least he finally started.
@BH: why not look into a player more active rather than only focusing on players doing nothing? there's 5 scum to catch.

Grackaroni

United States9856 Posts

January 13 2012 15:20 GMT

#1549

@Syllo: what are your thoughts on spaackle? He looks pretty scummy to me but you didn't mention him.

Grackaroni

United States9856 Posts

January 13 2012 15:25 GMT

#1552

Spaackle

Grackaroni

United States9856 Posts

January 13 2012 15:29 GMT

#1555

On January 14 2012 00:27 Bluelightz wrote:
Hmm, why?

If you want to make a case on me you could at least read my filter...

Grackaroni

United States9856 Posts

January 13 2012 18:03 GMT

#1578

@BH Those are my concerns... My case may not look like your's but I can give you an example of what your's would look like.
*post a bunch of BL random useless posts*
B-Dawg is hustling let's lynch.
you're not actually looking for scum you simply find somebody who is bad or inactive and prove why they are bad or inactive and tunnel them.

Grackaroni

United States9856 Posts

January 14 2012 00:15 GMT

#1623

But you didn't even read it Layabout...
He used Ver's guide as the basis for concluding that Palmar is town during a time when Palmar doesn't look particularly townish.

Grackaroni

United States9856 Posts

January 14 2012 00:49 GMT

#1633

If nobody wants to accept that spaackle/RoL is scum than I'll move to HoD.
We are basing a lynch purely off of the fact that he was sent to purgatory with no kill and he hasn't done much scumhunting.
the odds aren't even 90%
you said it yourself layabout about wiggles
Syllogism is also a good player so he could still have been targeted no?

How much better would an angel lynch be over a demon lynch right now, because I am pretty confident that Spaackle is a demon and RoL could be either.

Grackaroni

United States9856 Posts

January 14 2012 00:57 GMT

#1639

On January 14 2012 09:54 syllogism wrote:
Oh so only basing lynch on the fact he has done no scum hunting, been only defending himself, made a bunch of really strange posts from town perspective (like the one about palmar thinking that he was blue) and there was no kill on the night he was jailed. He never really suspected me despite knowing his own alignment, because he didn't want the focus to be on the fact that one of the jailed players is AoD.

Oh, so now you're talking to me?
I'll lynch HoD.
Maybe tomorrow you can put in the effort to actually look into Spaackle rather than ignoring my question and saying you don't give a shit about his allignment...

Grackaroni

United States9856 Posts

January 14 2012 01:03 GMT

#1640

EBWOP : in case I didn't make it clear.
##Vote: HarbingerOfDoom
he has a good chance of being the AoD and nobody wants to vote the people I think are likely to be scum.

Grackaroni

United States9856 Posts

January 14 2012 01:31 GMT

#1650

BL, why are you considering voting before even reading the cases?
@Layabout: would those BL posts go into the Layabout horseshit w/e?

Grackaroni

United States9856 Posts

January 14 2012 01:47 GMT

#1655

@Jackal: I thought you wanted to lynch dirkzor? Why BL and not dirkzor...
@Refallen: my vote is the 4th one there. double check before posting. The idea itself is good though, I would be happy to lynch RoL or spaackle and to banish HoD to purgatory.

Grackaroni

United States9856 Posts

January 14 2012 13:03 GMT

#1704

Can't talk much, going to class.

RoL has ONLY focused on BH, plus he has been too busy to scumhunt for the first 2 days but wasn't too busy to come up with a plan that was anti-town.
##Vote: RebirthOfLegend

Grackaroni

United States9856 Posts

January 14 2012 15:47 GMT

#1716

There's a reason why the entire town disagreed with you're plan. . . it's bad.
If all scum players simply claim VT then you get a trade off of having a confirmed voting block of 4 blue roles in exchange for them risking being shot or roleblocked which basically gets rid of their roles.
The execution was also very bad. The chance of a townie in this game lying to protect themselves or take a shot seems pretty likely to me.

All you're plan did was waste people's time and cause a couple of people to claim VT, which is bad for town.
You''re not helping by tunneling on BH, if you're extremely confident that he is scum than you can continue to push him but it doesn't mean that you should ignore everyone else. Surely there are other people in this game acting scummy besides BH, but you haven't bothered to push them.

Grackaroni

United States9856 Posts

January 14 2012 21:53 GMT

#1761

Actually he claimed a different role which makes it more confusing.

Grackaroni

United States9856 Posts

January 14 2012 22:00 GMT

#1770

I'm looking through his filter, can you point me to where he claimed VT, that in itself would be more than enough reason to lynch.