EPT[NA LCS] Summer 2014 Super Week 1 - Page 76
| Forum Index > LoL Tournaments |
|
GhandiEAGLE
United States20754 Posts
| ||
|
Gator
United States3432 Posts
| ||
|
Ryuu314
United States12679 Posts
so glad I have vasili on my fantasy team tho | ||
|
Alaric
France45622 Posts
| ||
|
Disengaged
United States6994 Posts
TSM lolno | ||
|
oo_Wonderful_oo
The land of freedom23126 Posts
Time to pick Wukong and Karthus? Vote pls, btw. If possible and you can press buttons/have time to do it. Poll: coL - LMQ - Bad game (6) - Came to watch Westrice playing. (4) - Mediocre game (1) - Excellent game (0) - Good game (0) 11 total votes Your vote: coL - LMQ (Vote): - Excellent game BAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAALE. | ||
|
Slusher
United States19143 Posts
| ||
|
ticklishmusic
United States15977 Posts
On May 25 2014 06:08 meowmasta85 wrote: i have to say i may have overrated robertxlee as a LCS level adc. he's always strong in the laning phase, but during teamfights he doesnt have optimal position nor does he go in aggresive. he's always first to back out and safe himself not really his fault, he can't count on his team to peel for him or do damage. his choices are to try and stay alive, or to go full yolo and try and do damage before he gets popped. | ||
|
Disengaged
United States6994 Posts
On May 25 2014 06:10 Slusher wrote: I can understand why the other teams in the league feel compelled to downplay LMQ but I can't see them finishing outside of the top 3 CLG was winning their game against them until they just completely DERPED on calls. | ||
|
Sakray
France2198 Posts
| ||
|
Ryuu314
United States12679 Posts
On May 25 2014 06:10 Slusher wrote: I can understand why the other teams in the league feel compelled to downplay LMQ but I can't see them finishing outside of the top 3 well to be fair, playing against challenger teams is generally not a good indicator of skill since challenger and LCS are on two hugely different levels. Even then, LMQ looked very beatable in the challenger league. I'm confident that C9 can easily beat LMQ. CLG and TSM also have the potential to consistently beat LMQ, but watching how they've been playing I'm very dubious. I'd say they're probably even. TSM really seems like they're still adjusting. Their calls and decision making is just not quite there. CLG looks solid, but Seraph isn't really living up to the hype. | ||
|
Slusher
United States19143 Posts
On May 25 2014 06:11 Disengaged wrote: CLG was winning their game against them until they just completely DERPED on calls. win is a win really need to see CLG vs TSM (which isn't happening this week  ) to cement my opinion but it's not so much that I think they are outright better than those teams but I think the 3 of them are close enough that one of the non LMQ teams will miss the cut albeit slightly | ||
|
meowmasta85
721 Posts
| ||
|
Disengaged
United States6994 Posts
On May 25 2014 06:12 Ryuu314 wrote: well to be fair, playing against challenger teams is generally not a good indicator of skill since challenger and LCS are on two hugely different levels. Even then, LMQ looked very beatable in the challenger league. I'm confident that C9 can easily beat LMQ. CLG and TSM also have the potential to consistently beat LMQ, but watching how they've been playing I'm very dubious. I'd say they're probably even. TSM really seems like they're still adjusting. Their calls and decision making is just not quite there. CLG looks solid, but Seraph isn't really living up to the hype. Give Seraph time to adjust and get used to things and then we can officially judge him. People hype things for no reason and people hype Seraph because hes korean and the streams showing him destroy less mechanical savvy players. | ||
|
SwizzY
United States1549 Posts
| ||
|
GhandiEAGLE
United States20754 Posts
Sure, but the point is that it was a close game that, if repeated, could easily end in an LMQ loss. Assuming TSM is more or less at CLG's skill level, it's totally feasible to see LMQ getting fourth place. | ||
|
Amui
Canada10567 Posts
| ||
|
oo_Wonderful_oo
The land of freedom23126 Posts
On May 25 2014 06:14 SwizzY wrote: Not trying to flame, but is pr0lly actually good? I feel like every time Ive ever watched him play he's underperformed/outright played badly. Anyone know his history? pr0lly carried coL to place where are they right now. And he destroyed Shiphtur in Promotions. Previously, he came to replace Chuuper in coL mid and almost saved them from facing Quantic who became C9 later, picking Ziggs and Annie and winning with them. It was glorious. | ||
|
MattBarry
United States4006 Posts
On May 25 2014 06:14 SwizzY wrote: Not trying to flame, but is pr0lly actually good? I feel like every time Ive ever watched him play he's underperformed/outright played badly. Anyone know his history? He was probably the best challenger mid after XWX | ||
|
meowmasta85
721 Posts
On May 25 2014 06:15 GhandiEAGLE wrote: Sure, but the point is that it was a close game that, if repeated, could easily end in an LMQ loss. Assuming TSM is more or less at CLG's skill level, it's totally feasible to see LMQ getting fourth place. and by the same logic, it's totally feasible to see LMQ getting second (or maybe even first) place? why don't we wait for a few weeks to see how things play out. predictions now are worthless anyways | ||
| ||
