[EU LCS] Spring 2014 Playoffs - Page 27
Forum Index > LoL Tournaments |
Sleight
2471 Posts
| ||
![]()
onlywonderboy
United States23745 Posts
On April 17 2014 01:53 Sleight wrote: Please talk more about the Ziggs-Zed matchup. Yeah, because the changes to Exhaust hasn't had any effect on how this match-up has played out. Edit: Unless you are talking about Quickshot talking nonsense then just ignore me. | ||
SharkStarcraft
Austria2236 Posts
| ||
Roffles
![]()
Pitcairn19291 Posts
| ||
Roffles
![]()
Pitcairn19291 Posts
| ||
Swords
6038 Posts
On April 17 2014 01:56 SharkStarcraft wrote: Quickshot is truly the best at pointing out the most obvious things ever in a really exiting way. Guess there's not much to talk about when you don't really have deep knowledge of the game. I just remember him saying that LeBlanc is a terrible pick in midlane in like the 2nd week of this split and stupid things like that. List of dumbass things Quickshot has said: 1. Nami can suppress people 2. BotrK does magic damage 3. Lulu is an assassin feel free to add more. He just says so much stuff that isn't only stupid, but completely wrong. He absolutely should not be an analyst. | ||
Sedzz
Australia391 Posts
| ||
FaRess
Tunisia937 Posts
| ||
Redox
Germany24794 Posts
On April 17 2014 02:03 FaRess wrote: It's wierd everyone is focusing on quikshot, deman is just as shit. One is analyst, the other play-by-play. | ||
FaRess
Tunisia937 Posts
I understand that, but the fake excitement, and the few times he tries to say something relevant are just as bad. | ||
Dan HH
Romania9129 Posts
On April 17 2014 02:03 FaRess wrote: It's wierd everyone is focusing on quikshot, deman is just as shit. But Deman is mostly doing play-by-play while Quikshot for some mysterious reason ended up being a color caster | ||
Swords
6038 Posts
On April 17 2014 02:05 FaRess wrote: I understand that, but the fake excitement, and the few times he tries to say something relevant are just as bad. You did manage to time this nicely with Deman continuing to commentate a chase that wasn't even happening. | ||
Roffles
![]()
Pitcairn19291 Posts
On April 17 2014 02:03 FaRess wrote: It's wierd everyone is focusing on quikshot, deman is just as shit. Deman's play by play is fine. It's not great, but it's not awful. Quickshot's analysis is utter garbage because half of it is spewing inaccurate shit. He might be much better as a play by play commentator, but asking him to do color commentary is just dumb. | ||
orzeu
Poland5205 Posts
| ||
Redox
Germany24794 Posts
| ||
SharkStarcraft
Austria2236 Posts
On April 17 2014 02:06 Roffles wrote: Deman's play by play is fine. It's not great, but it's not awful. Quickshot's analysis is utter garbage because half of it is spewing inaccurate shit. He might be much better as a play by play commentator, but asking him to do color commentary is just dumb. I like how delicately pick apart quikshot xD It's all true though The thing about Deman is that while he doesn't know shit about the game either he at least does not pretend to. Quikshot is just not suited for the job of an analyst. | ||
Amethyst21
Canada7032 Posts
| ||
Roffles
![]()
Pitcairn19291 Posts
| ||
skykh
3006 Posts
| ||
Neverhood
United States5388 Posts
| ||
| ||