|
On August 07 2009 06:34 Kwark wrote:Show nested quote +On August 07 2009 01:50 RaGe wrote:
Don't try to argue with him, it's pointless. You were right. I typed out a response but realised against his wall of constitution, founding fathers wishes and federal government intervention it just wouldn't get through.
Obviously because 90% of America cannot sustain human existence. Let's even break that down to 25%. 25% is still on the order of nearly 1.75 billion people. You don't think America has the capacity to sustain existence on 25% of the land?
|
What was the predicted population cap? 10 billion?
|
Stop getting the thread off topic Aegraen, this is about Mass extinction, not human population, this is about geological evidence, biological evidences, and earth evolution, human population sustain existance are insignificant in comparison, and off topic. The planet will still be here till the sun engulf earth, but the people are fucked, people might be fucked long long before that.
|
if u look at the contact between upper mesozoic and lower neozoic strata is fairly common to find a layer of "carbone" and Iridyum wich is commonly related to meteorites...
|
MURICA15980 Posts
On August 07 2009 06:40 Aegraen wrote:Show nested quote +On August 07 2009 06:34 Kwark wrote:On August 07 2009 01:50 RaGe wrote:
Don't try to argue with him, it's pointless. You were right. I typed out a response but realised against his wall of constitution, founding fathers wishes and federal government intervention it just wouldn't get through. Obviously because 90% of America cannot sustain human existence. Let's even break that down to 25%. 25% is still on the order of nearly 1.75 billion people. You don't think America has the capacity to sustain existence on 25% of the land?
With current consumption patterns, it's quite possibly no.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
