|
|
On December 16 2011 09:30 Grettin wrote: How is the situation looking so far? Good or bad?
Not good as far as amendments go. Now how that affects whether or not the bill will pass is a different matter. Good if it lets the bill get shot down, bad if the bill passes.
|
It's looking like nothing will be resolved for ages.
|
On December 16 2011 09:30 Grettin wrote: How is the situation looking so far? Good or bad?
Amendments are getting shot down left and right and their is a startling amount of ignorance being exposed in the room. It's looking grim.
|
On December 16 2011 09:31 Zalithian wrote:Show nested quote +On December 16 2011 09:30 Grettin wrote: How is the situation looking so far? Good or bad? Not good as far as amendments go. Now how that affects whether or not the bill will pass is a different matter. Good if it lets the bill get shot down, bad if the bill passes.
There have been some very reasonable amendments that would make this bill more realistic but they're not getting any support. Lets hope that the bill doesn't pass.
|
Goodlatte, another douchebag.
|
For me a as a non-american, this is pure comedy gold.. sorry guys : (
|
Well its good for you guys actually if they don't change much about the bill.The more retarded it is the less likely it is to pass later on. I'd be more afraid of a seemingly dumbed down form of a bill.
|
On December 16 2011 09:35 FMStyles wrote: For me a as a non-american, this is pure comedy gold.. sorry guys : (
The consequences are far more wide reaching than solely the US. Nobody should find this funny.
We, not Americans, not countrymen, but decent people and netizens should all be united in opposition.
|
Judiciary staffers : the schedule and what will happen tomorrow.
They will adjourn sometime tonight and reconvene tomorrow morning they have a ton of amendments remaining they have yet to set the time to reconvene
|
On December 16 2011 09:35 FMStyles wrote: For me a as a non-american, this is pure comedy gold.. sorry guys : ( it's okay. it's funny to me too. in a sad depressing kind of way, but it's hilarious nonetheless.
|
seems fitting after listening for a few hours
|
On December 16 2011 09:01 Corrosive wrote:Show nested quote +On December 16 2011 08:58 ManaFortress wrote:On December 16 2011 08:54 Crazyeyes wrote:On December 16 2011 08:52 ManaFortress wrote:If SOPA goes trough, then i predict that Anon will hack US goverment websites and ad pirated/copyright material onto the site, forcing the US govement websites to be blocked by their own laws. On December 16 2011 08:49 Serpico wrote: Is having a preprepared statement at the ready whenever someone brings up the amendment normal? It's odd how some people can respond to different comments with something prepared no matter what. Yes, since all amendments are submited before the hering, since there is a rooster with all the admendments in it. Or they'll just, you know, remove the ads. I understand your point, but if the site has still broken the law, even if just for a day. Yeah i bet the government will ban their own site after being hacked. Then anyone that is being charged for infringement of IP on their website can get off the hook by saying that they here hacked and that it was hackers who added the content.
|
On December 16 2011 09:35 FMStyles wrote: For me a as a non-american, this is pure comedy gold.. sorry guys : ( I would like to find it funny,but my country ain't the least bit better,in fact,it's even worse......
|
On December 16 2011 09:35 FMStyles wrote: For me a as a non-american, this is pure comedy gold.. sorry guys : (
yea i'm pretty sure at least half the websites you use on a daily basis are operated out of the US. so no, this ain't funny for you either.
|
i dont like the current amendment they are debating... it is true that without a barrier of 'loser pay' their will be thousand and thousand of filing to bully the defender. However the 'loser pay' system itself is a system designed to protect the big corporations.... Im so confused....
|
Man, what the fuck is wrong with this Johnson guy. I'm not trying to be a dick but it seems like he has some mental disability.
|
off topic, this clerk is pretty hot.
|
On December 16 2011 09:53 Enki wrote: Man, what the fuck is wrong with this Johnson guy. I'm not trying to be a dick but it seems like he has some mental disability. there are some special method in slow talking to make sure you get to the point that you want to get to. Not only that this is a timed debate, delaying shit by slow speak while the time is on their side is just a self protecting move....
However in Johnson case, yeah i think he need to check with the hospital
|
Are there any experts on the subject who are brought in in these types of hearings?
|
supreme court can shut this down if it gets passed right? or do i need to start paying attention in gov class?
|
|
|
|