EPTGame starts at 14:04 (earlier was test stream)
Team Liquid Blood Bowl League - SEASON 1 - Page 8
| Forum Index > General Games |
|
Nokarot
United States1410 Posts
Game starts at 14:04 (earlier was test stream) | ||
|
MaiBoA38
United States108 Posts
Edit: NM its on now | ||
|
Catyoul
France2377 Posts
How tu use BBmanager : 1. Install BB manager : http://94.23.239.117/BloodBowlManager.ClickOnce/publish.htm 2. Make an account with the same name as your BB account (different password obviously) 3. To upload replays, the easiest is having BBmanager open before playing your match. After playing it, BBmanager will pop a little bubble offering you to submit the game. Select the league, confirm the players names and input the match day and that's it. Team hall of fame : + Show Spoiler + Player hall of fame : + Show Spoiler + Results day 1 : + Show Spoiler + | ||
|
Nokarot
United States1410 Posts
Make sure to communicate with your opponent and in this thread so we all know when matches are  | ||
|
jaycee
Australia62 Posts
I'm thinking late Saturday GMT for a changeover: EU (GMT+0): Saturday 2300h US (GMT -6): Saturday 1700h AU (GMT+8): Sunday 0700h This would mean everyone can play 1 game Saturday and 1 game Sunday and be done for the week. Would propose a Match Day change Wednesday evening as well. Thoughts? Does this not work for any timezone? | ||
|
Nokarot
United States1410 Posts
I'm up 24/7 all day every day and currently on medical leave for classes and basically have no responsibilities, so I don't care if I play at crazy times to accommodate people outside my time zone. Obviously everyone else has lives and would love to find a more structured way of doing things- I just fear that issues may arise. I would rather stick to a loose schedule and just change the day when everyone is done than to potentially have to hear about a tough decision of awarding a win to someone because a game couldn't be scheduled before a forced day change. Even if it means we end up playing a 30+ week league, that's what I'd prefer anyway. If there was a forced day change on Saturday, though, you'd essentially be scheduling it to 1 game per week unless you forced a day change mid-week, too, would you not? Otherwise it would be (for example) day 5 starting on Sunday and ending on the following Saturday. You'd have to say Sunday-Wednesday and Wednesday-Saturday or something. | ||
|
jaycee
Australia62 Posts
On November 14 2010 19:05 jaycee wrote: This would mean everyone can play 1 game Saturday and 1 game Sunday and be done for the week. Would propose a Match Day change Wednesday evening as well. Yeah not personally worried about forfeiting games if I have to (can play vs Euro easily I think). Its more a case of wanting to firm up some transition of Match Days so that: 1) the days actually transition 2) can start planning games a little in advance | ||
|
Nokarot
United States1410 Posts
| ||
|
cloudica
England43 Posts
Can you delete games from the record? | ||
|
Catyoul
France2377 Posts
| ||
|
TargetPractice
Sweden33 Posts
Maybe the league could advance at mid-day on monday and mid-day on friday? so you had one game on fri-sat-sun one game on mon-tue-wed-thur | ||
|
Megelrov
Denmark95 Posts
| ||
|
Zanzabar Haberdasher
United States510 Posts
If everyone can get week 2 done in 48 hours, we'll move to week 3. If week 3 is done in 12 hours we'll move to week 4. Until someone starts lagging behind, I think this is the way to do it. | ||
|
TargetPractice
Sweden33 Posts
Also, I do think we need a time limit where games need to be done. Then people can plan around this so they know when they are expceted to have played. It will probably happen alot that a single game lags behind even if most players do play thier games in timely fashon. I vote for 2 games/week but 1 g/week could be possible as well, but like now it is only one game that isnt played from week 1 and noone knows when it will be played. Could be tonite, could be in a few days, could be never. | ||
|
Brownjesus
Denmark53 Posts
On November 15 2010 03:14 TargetPractice wrote: It could be nice if you give someone co-admin so we can update the league frequently. Also, I do think we need a time limit where games need to be done. Then people can plan around this so they know when they are expceted to have played. It will probably happen alot that a single game lags behind even if most players do play thier games in timely fashon. I vote for 2 games/week but 1 g/week could be possible as well, but like now it is only one game that isnt played from week 1 and noone knows when it will be played. Could be tonite, could be in a few days, could be never. i have pretty much made it clear on several occasions that it is supposed to be played tonight :p my opponent havent been around for the past few days, cause of travels.. or something... but i expect it to be played tonight... so easy now tiger :p | ||
|
Zanzabar Haberdasher
United States510 Posts
On November 15 2010 03:14 TargetPractice wrote: It could be nice if you give someone co-admin so we can update the league frequently. Also, I do think we need a time limit where games need to be done. Then people can plan around this so they know when they are expceted to have played. It will probably happen alot that a single game lags behind even if most players do play thier games in timely fashon. I vote for 2 games/week but 1 g/week could be possible as well, but like now it is only one game that isnt played from week 1 and noone knows when it will be played. Could be tonite, could be in a few days, could be never. At this time there is no reason to give someone the power to fiddle with standings and or the matchmaking. I frequently check to see if all the week's games are done, so be assured that when the game happens you'll know about it. | ||
|
Jaug
Sweden249 Posts
| ||
|
Megelrov
Denmark95 Posts
| ||
|
Brownjesus
Denmark53 Posts
| ||
|
kingjames01
Canada1603 Posts
| ||
| ||
