[ManilaMajor] Group Stage - C & D - Page 28
Forum Index > Dota 2 Tournaments |
GeneralStan
United States4789 Posts
| ||
OuchyDathurts
United States4588 Posts
On June 04 2016 14:28 ForTehDarkseid wrote: Weren't they running some games yesterday ahead of the schedule though? Don't see how that matters. You gotta give the teams a few minutes between series to look at the replay, grab a quick snack, smoke, take a dump, or whatever. Can't just force them to play another BO3 instantly off the back of one. 5 min delay is the least of my concerns. Let us not forget the last major was Shanghai so.... | ||
bluzi
4703 Posts
![]() ![]() | ||
Toadesstern
Germany16350 Posts
On June 04 2016 14:30 spudde123 wrote: It's not a surprise Charlie is a good panelist when he is actually using his knowledge instead of hiding it. For example yesterday he was talking about the personalities in Secret, about what Arteezy had said to him at some point etc. He has a lot of experience and access that most panelists don't have and can tell unique things that are interesting to viewers. I just doubted he would actually use that but it seems he is. the man is not holding back the time he showed us what it probably sounds like when EE and Arteezy argue about builds after losing. Didn't he also basicly call bulba a moron in non-dota-related things leading to his choking? ![]() and omg that interview | ||
FiWiFaKi
Canada9859 Posts
On June 04 2016 14:30 spudde123 wrote: It's not a surprise Charlie is a good panelist when he is actually using his knowledge instead of hiding it. For example yesterday he was talking about the personalities in Secret, about what Arteezy had said to him at some point etc. He has a lot of experience and access that most panelists don't have and can tell unique things that are interesting to viewers. I just doubted he would actually use that but it seems he is. Yeah, he seems knowledgeable. It's unfortunate, but the casters are way way more knowledgeable than the analysts. Nahaz has his statistics stuff but doesn't say anything, Redeye never adds any information besides extracting information from others, and Fogged just says really obvious stuff imo. So people like Charlie are a rare commodity imo, I also enjoy his humor. | ||
Taf the Ghost
United States11751 Posts
| ||
OuchyDathurts
United States4588 Posts
On June 04 2016 14:30 spudde123 wrote: It's not a surprise Charlie is a good panelist when he is actually using his knowledge instead of hiding it. For example yesterday he was talking about the personalities in Secret, about what Arteezy had said to him at some point etc. He has a lot of experience and access that most panelists don't have and can tell unique things that are interesting to viewers. I just doubted he would actually use that but it seems he is. I'm pleasantly surprised by Charlie. He's a smart guy, he knows the inner workings of the scene better than most, he went to law school so he's not dumb by any stretch. You could always tell he was a really knowledgeable dude, but you didn't know if you were going to get the jackass Charlie or the smart guy Charlie. He's doing a really fantastic job though. | ||
Daralii
United States16991 Posts
Sort of. Tobi has to restart the game for some reason. | ||
Toadesstern
Germany16350 Posts
For me that spot belongs to Black so far despite me liking the guy. He knows his shit but he just doesn't seem to quite fit | ||
Daralii
United States16991 Posts
On June 04 2016 14:37 Toadesstern wrote: so if Charlie is the best, who's the worst? For me that spot belongs to Black so far despite me liking the guy. He knows his shit but he just doesn't seem to quite fit Agreed on Black. His knowledge is great, but he has a hard time speaking and sounds really high-strung. | ||
FiWiFaKi
Canada9859 Posts
On June 04 2016 14:37 Toadesstern wrote: so if Charlie is the best, who's the worst? For me that spot belongs to Black so far despite me liking the guy. He knows his shit but he just doesn't seem to quite fit Yeah, Black is a nice guy, very friendly, but just not good at speaking or keeping people's attention. If I was to rank analysts best to worst (from who's available): 1. Charlie 2. Winter 3. Purge (The top three are 1st class, the others I could think of 10+ analysts I'd rather have who are not at the event) 4. Fogged 5. Black 6. Nahaz I think some Casters here are great panelists - Waga, Merlini, Capitalist, Draskyl in particular are superb, and LD is solid too imo. | ||
Kuroeeah
11696 Posts
| ||
bluzi
4703 Posts
On June 04 2016 14:51 Kuroeeah wrote: EG looking to beat up LGD, barring some miracle high ground LGD defense How so ? They have a #4 position NP .... how does he have so little farm i dont understand.... Good thing Fear farms up | ||
FiWiFaKi
Canada9859 Posts
On June 04 2016 14:51 Kuroeeah wrote: EG looking to beat up LGD, barring some miracle high ground LGD defense Well you like to call things extremely early. | ||
Kuroeeah
11696 Posts
On June 04 2016 14:52 bluzi wrote: How so ? They have a #4 position NP .... how does he have so little farm i dont understand.... Good thing Fear farms up Holy shit your right Bulba is so poor ROFL | ||
Kuroeeah
11696 Posts
On June 04 2016 14:53 FiWiFaKi wrote: Well you like to call things extremely early. are you arguing EG doesn't have a significant lead? | ||
Taf the Ghost
United States11751 Posts
| ||
bluzi
4703 Posts
hhhh , they just rolled the bottom lane somehow , crazy !!! | ||
FiWiFaKi
Canada9859 Posts
On June 04 2016 14:55 Kuroeeah wrote: are you arguing EG doesn't have a significant lead? Before losing the bottom rax, no I didn't think so. A minor lead, like a 60/40 chance of EG winning, now they're up to 95/5. | ||
bluzi
4703 Posts
On June 04 2016 14:55 Kuroeeah wrote: are you arguing EG doesn't have a significant lead? Before the 2 heroes dieing bot and losing rax , of course they DIDNT ..... | ||
| ||