EPT[ManilaMajor] Group Stage - A & B - Page 57
| Forum Index > Dota 2 Tournaments |
|
OuchyDathurts
United States4588 Posts
| ||
|
bluzi
4703 Posts
| ||
|
Taf the Ghost
United States11751 Posts
Each of the heroes are fine, but together you're expecting miracles from all of your cores to make it work. | ||
|
wims80
1892 Posts
| ||
|
tm_invincible
Vietnam220 Posts
| ||
|
Atoissen
Norway1737 Posts
On June 03 2016 19:15 Pandemona wrote: They either won league or win champions league they are more than successful for what they do. Since 1999 they have only had 3 season where they did not either win champions league or the league title, thats pretty outstanding  Well.. not to take to much away from RM, but they have played in La Liga... Look at who won La Liga the last 50 seasons... Its 90% Barca or RM... Before theier Galacticos style they won it 5 times ina row from 86-91. they won it 32 times in total since 1932... Meh, whatever...  | ||
|
OuchyDathurts
United States4588 Posts
| ||
|
bluzi
4703 Posts
| ||
|
Dracolich70
Denmark3820 Posts
On June 03 2016 19:15 Pandemona wrote: They play in a league where Barcelona and Real got the bulk of the TV money, and 90% of the teams have a budget on par with a championship side, while Barcelona and Real can pick from any side in the world.They either won league or win champions league they are more than successful for what they do. Since 1999 they have only had 3 season where they did not either win champions league or the league title, thats pretty outstanding As he said, Galacticos was never as successful, because team composition was not thought through, but just getting star players for shirt sales in mind - and precidency PR. Any successful team needs so-called water carriers to set up star players. Having 5 or 11(22) star players that just want to be the star will never work. Atl. Madrid and Leicester are proofs of team success over star quality with team compositions. | ||
|
OuchyDathurts
United States4588 Posts
| ||
|
Diavlo
Belgium2915 Posts
On June 03 2016 19:10 Shergal wrote: To me that's the definition of not top-tier. He can coast through a simple game but he can't gain advantages where there were none to begin with (which is what the top-tier players do). He's top-tier at other aspects of the game but for someone who has been playing professionally since Dota 1 and never made any waves outside of ppd's cozy leadership people really liked to inflate him as some sort of higher being who was above Dota. Your definition of being a top tier laner is being risky? Universe gained plenty of advantage in lanes, especially in dangerous ones where others would feed. As far as his abilities before ppd, he was a good player before (definitely the best Dignitas player) and he definitely improved in EG, maybe the team made him look better than he was but that can be said about pretty much anyone. | ||
|
OuchyDathurts
United States4588 Posts
| ||
|
Ayaz2810
United States2763 Posts
The word "versing" is not a real one. Please stop saying "when you're versing a riki, you want to buy sentry wards". It sounds horrible, and most of you do it. This has been a public service announcement | ||
|
OuchyDathurts
United States4588 Posts
| ||
|
OuchyDathurts
United States4588 Posts
| ||
Pandemona
Charlie Sheens House51493 Posts
| ||
|
nayumi
Australia6499 Posts
| ||
|
hunter_x
Germany2762 Posts
| ||
|
sweatbomb
Sweden469 Posts
| ||
|
Racket
3023 Posts
| ||
| ||
