|
I mean, NFL players get to keep playing after they punch their girlfriend in an elevator. Why not Dota, right?
|
cuz korok brings no money home also he isnt very good
|
SoCal8933 Posts
On June 23 2015 09:17 IntoTheheart wrote:Show nested quote +On June 23 2015 08:16 BluemoonSC wrote:On June 23 2015 08:13 Belisarius wrote:On June 23 2015 07:56 BluemoonSC wrote:On June 23 2015 07:46 Belisarius wrote:On June 23 2015 07:18 BluemoonSC wrote:
azarkon responded guys
he linked me a yahoo answers q/a to tell me what a model is
he's still using model in the wrong context
lmao idk he's being pretentious as all hell but I'm not sure it's totally off-base. He's really just using it as a synonym for "hypothesis", and I you see that usage all the time in scientific literature, whether or not it's technically correct. I've probably done it myself once or twice. let's assume his opinion constitutes a model for a moment. models have to have a mechanism. what is the mechanism here? in addition, how can his "model" be refuted? Secret and EG players are higher skilled, and it has nothing to do with the meta..ok so how do you back that up? what constitutes skill? all he states is that western teams have won games in teh past 6 months, that's really it. btw erasme, you think you could have linked a timestamp, frenchie? i was unimpressed bc you ate every skill up until you turned around and killed WR and mag. nice one. I'm not defending his actual argument. I said it was a hypothesis, I didn't say it was a good or testable one. It's probably still a model though. I suppose his mechanism is that quick adaptation is delivering better results than a generally higher baseline skill level. Again, not saying I agree with any part of that, or any of the underlying assumptions. The issue is with the assumptions, though, not on the technicality of whether or not it's a model. This is far too much text for this thread. ya but a hypothesis alone isn't a model. a model is used to explain something, e.g. western teams having more skill. he does nothing to illustrate that other than say "they win games" where you have a million different variables. I just read that thread. Interesting stuff, guys. Are you a math/science teacher? Because that's the vibe I"m getting.
math so you can probably understand why it grinds my gears lol
e: just got done with the world's heaviest team holy shit http://www.dotabuff.com/matches/1575337464
|
On June 23 2015 09:15 SKC wrote:
There is the issue that wifi in prison isn't that good.
concrete sucks for wifi lolol
|
On June 23 2015 09:23 BluemoonSC wrote:Show nested quote +On June 23 2015 09:17 IntoTheheart wrote:On June 23 2015 08:16 BluemoonSC wrote:On June 23 2015 08:13 Belisarius wrote:On June 23 2015 07:56 BluemoonSC wrote:On June 23 2015 07:46 Belisarius wrote:On June 23 2015 07:18 BluemoonSC wrote:
azarkon responded guys
he linked me a yahoo answers q/a to tell me what a model is
he's still using model in the wrong context
lmao idk he's being pretentious as all hell but I'm not sure it's totally off-base. He's really just using it as a synonym for "hypothesis", and I you see that usage all the time in scientific literature, whether or not it's technically correct. I've probably done it myself once or twice. let's assume his opinion constitutes a model for a moment. models have to have a mechanism. what is the mechanism here? in addition, how can his "model" be refuted? Secret and EG players are higher skilled, and it has nothing to do with the meta..ok so how do you back that up? what constitutes skill? all he states is that western teams have won games in teh past 6 months, that's really it. btw erasme, you think you could have linked a timestamp, frenchie? i was unimpressed bc you ate every skill up until you turned around and killed WR and mag. nice one. I'm not defending his actual argument. I said it was a hypothesis, I didn't say it was a good or testable one. It's probably still a model though. I suppose his mechanism is that quick adaptation is delivering better results than a generally higher baseline skill level. Again, not saying I agree with any part of that, or any of the underlying assumptions. The issue is with the assumptions, though, not on the technicality of whether or not it's a model. This is far too much text for this thread. ya but a hypothesis alone isn't a model. a model is used to explain something, e.g. western teams having more skill. he does nothing to illustrate that other than say "they win games" where you have a million different variables. I just read that thread. Interesting stuff, guys. Are you a math/science teacher? Because that's the vibe I"m getting. math so you can probably understand why it grinds my gears lol e: just got done with the world's heaviest team holy shit http://www.dotabuff.com/matches/1575337464
I almost asked "which player were you" but then figured it out.
Makes sense why faulty arguments would be annoying if you're a math teacher. 
|
On June 23 2015 09:23 BluemoonSC wrote:Show nested quote +On June 23 2015 09:17 IntoTheheart wrote:On June 23 2015 08:16 BluemoonSC wrote:On June 23 2015 08:13 Belisarius wrote:On June 23 2015 07:56 BluemoonSC wrote:On June 23 2015 07:46 Belisarius wrote:On June 23 2015 07:18 BluemoonSC wrote:
azarkon responded guys
he linked me a yahoo answers q/a to tell me what a model is
he's still using model in the wrong context
lmao idk he's being pretentious as all hell but I'm not sure it's totally off-base. He's really just using it as a synonym for "hypothesis", and I you see that usage all the time in scientific literature, whether or not it's technically correct. I've probably done it myself once or twice. let's assume his opinion constitutes a model for a moment. models have to have a mechanism. what is the mechanism here? in addition, how can his "model" be refuted? Secret and EG players are higher skilled, and it has nothing to do with the meta..ok so how do you back that up? what constitutes skill? all he states is that western teams have won games in teh past 6 months, that's really it. btw erasme, you think you could have linked a timestamp, frenchie? i was unimpressed bc you ate every skill up until you turned around and killed WR and mag. nice one. I'm not defending his actual argument. I said it was a hypothesis, I didn't say it was a good or testable one. It's probably still a model though. I suppose his mechanism is that quick adaptation is delivering better results than a generally higher baseline skill level. Again, not saying I agree with any part of that, or any of the underlying assumptions. The issue is with the assumptions, though, not on the technicality of whether or not it's a model. This is far too much text for this thread. ya but a hypothesis alone isn't a model. a model is used to explain something, e.g. western teams having more skill. he does nothing to illustrate that other than say "they win games" where you have a million different variables. I just read that thread. Interesting stuff, guys. Are you a math/science teacher? Because that's the vibe I"m getting. math so you can probably understand why it grinds my gears lol e: just got done with the world's heaviest team holy shit http://www.dotabuff.com/matches/1575337464
ask a-god to script it in matlab and simulate it 1000 times
that way we'll know the odds of EG/Secret winning and bet real money accordingly
|
if it was a european prison maybe he could get a computer but I wouldnt count on a virginia prison letting inmates do much more then watch tv and work out
|
bluemoon is experimenting with the bloodseeker abuse model of playing dota
|
SoCal8933 Posts
On June 23 2015 10:06 SpiritoftheTunA wrote:
bluemoon is experimenting with the bloodseeker abuse model of playing dota
im not sorry for moving faster than the speed of light to and from kills
my only death last game was the result of me not getting to press bkb button because i was dealing with 500 ping spikes
http://www.dotabuff.com/matches/1575393431
i dont plan on making radiance a thing, its for a challenge, but boy is it working/funny.
the hero is just so retardedly fun lmao
|
jesus whatiship is awful at pr
|
|
|
|
|
SoCal8933 Posts
On June 23 2015 10:21 SpiritoftheTunA wrote:
that mjollnir though
according to the dotabuff model of shadowfiend builds, with a 67.84% win rate, mjollnir is clearly a strong item choice on shadow fiend
|
On June 23 2015 10:15 andyrau wrote:
jesus whatiship is awful at pr
What part? The part where he confirmed the arrest or that everyone who mattered also knew?
|
On June 23 2015 10:29 Plansix wrote:What part? The part where he confirmed the arrest or that everyone who mattered also knew?
that statement was awfully done.
standard gerg
|
HighgroundTV Gerg here! Im here to confirm that our talented Wifestrangler will be playing at this years TI! I have already talked to Valve on the matter and reached an agreement that in favor for their support for Korok, i'll stop composing angry tweets related to how they're killing DotA.
|
SoCal8933 Posts
will a steam controller be worth it? what do you guys think
|
my buddy who tested it at pax east said it was the shit
|
On June 23 2015 10:41 Kuroeeah wrote:
HighgroundTV Gerg here! Im here to confirm that our talented Wifestrangler will be playing at this years TI! I have already talked to Valve on the matter and reached an agreement that in favor for their support for Korok, i'll stop composing angry tweets related to how they're killing DotA.
Gerg doesn't even play dota this is a FARCE
|
On June 23 2015 10:52 BluemoonSC wrote:
will a steam controller be worth it? what do you guys think
my model: keyboard/mouse is better than steam controller
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
