|
On December 31 2009 03:35 eXigent. wrote:
For $430 you could have sex with 2-3 really really pretty escorts out of the phonebook, and actually feel what its like to be with someone as hot as a pornstar. Total waste of money imo.
agree... I wouldnt spend my money in a piece of rubber when for the same amount i can get a real person.
|
Unfortunately, if we aren't careful...This is the future of TL threads. Lets work together people to prevent this future from happening! Global Retardation is real.
|
On December 30 2009 23:23 Biff The Understudy wrote:
Sometimes we will all have ou little pill to be happy. That will be great: you don't need to think, you don't need to be wise, you don't even need to interact with people. Just buy your pill and enjoy.
Fucking nihilist society. What a hateful time.
I hear you man.
+ Show Spoiler +And all I can say is, gimme my pill.
|
I love how the second video is tv rated G.
|
The sexbot revolution is arriving!
|
for all you people saying you'd rather spend the money on escorts, keep in mind thats 400$ a pop, while you get multiple uses (I assume o.o) out of this thing
|
ummm wow.....
that's pretty... disturbing?
|
At that price, it would be a better investment than the last girl I dated.
|
I love how just about everyone in this thread is like "lol i'm such a MANY MAN i could never even conceive the possibility of getting off without the aid of a woman"
Seriously fucking reminds of a bunch of prepubescent kids trying to prove how much of men they are. get off your fucking high horses.
|
@ captainwaffles: I know, right?
I have regular sex with my girlfriend and I'm still interested in this sort of technology. Anyone open-minded about sex reasonably should be. Probably 70% of the people talking strongly against this sort of thing aren't getting as much sex as they want. Poor dears!
|
On December 31 2009 03:23 EsX_Raptor wrote:
I bet chicks feel like toys every time they see a thread like this...
Lol yeah dude because dildos don't exist. Nobody says this is replacing women, and only people who DO view women as sex objects would think like that.
Way to own yourself.
|
On December 31 2009 05:02 captainwaffles wrote:
I love how just about everyone in this thread is like "lol i'm such a MANY MAN i could never even conceive the possibility of getting off without the aid of a woman"
Seriously fucking reminds of a bunch of prepubescent kids trying to prove how much of men they are. get off your fucking high horses.
On December 31 2009 05:09 Turbovolver wrote:
@ captainwaffles: I know, right?
I have regular sex with my girlfriend and I'm still interested in this sort of technology. Anyone open-minded about sex reasonably should be. Probably 70% of the people talking strongly against this sort of thing aren't getting as much sex as they want. Poor dears!
Does being in the "Lol im cool on the internetz" group make you feel better?
|
To all people against this: just think of this as leveling the playing field. Women get all sorts of high-tech sex-toys. That is something fundamentally wrong. Guys have always had the higher level of gizmo-love, and it's about time that we had something for our, err, gizmo-loving.
|
Eh, fair enough. I guess the general idea of it aint greatly different than a vibrator. And yet...it is. Perhaps it is because I never grow up with the notion that a pump to get off is very acceptable, or maybe its part of a mans Psyche, I don't know. What I do is that video disgusted me and I clicked it off about twenty seconds in.
|
I just found this funny. Don't read too much into it - just seems like another way for lonely guys to get off.
|
On December 30 2009 23:58 DM20 wrote:Show nested quote +On December 30 2009 23:42 29 fps wrote:
introduce this device to countries with overpopulation problems. and make sure they have computers. or condoms which would cost them much less.
GOD DOES NOT WANT US TO USE CONDOMS
|
On December 30 2009 23:00 El.Divino wrote:
.....
I'd like to increase my post count.
What he said... -_-;;
|
|
|
|
|
Seems like this thread is more about the future of sex rather than the future of porn.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
