[MSL] NaDa vs Jangbi Quarterfinal C - Page 10

On March 05 2009 18:29 0z wrote:

he's been lingering on the scene for far too long
plus i dont't like him

On March 05 2009 18:29 0z wrote:

he's been lingering on the scene for far too long
plus i dont't like him

On March 05 2009 18:28 Gryffindor_us wrote:
Some thoughts on the match:

NaDa needs to be very careful about being aggressive early on against Jangbi because it was a poor idea last time (1 tank 5 marines on Andromeda). If he's going to do that he needs to bait Jangbi out because after Jangbi repelled that attack he marched across the map (exposing his main). Well, NaDa could take advantage of that counter-aggression if he did something like Fantasy did against Jangbi (barring some sick probe scout) or with some well placed vultures.

NaDa did really well against Jangbi when he defended against reavers with good turret placement and a fast break across the map. (Consistent with HiyA)

NaDa should heavily consider an old style dropship build against Jangbi on one of the maps because Jangbi does not build cannons. (especially so after 1st and 2nd expansion)

NaDa might incorporate goliaths in an early march across map to stymie Zealot bombs. (Ala HiyA)

Finally, NaDa should not cheese Jangbi. That is a bad idea XD! Feel free to tear this apart. I hope it doesn't seem like I'm pointing out things inherent to PvT but I feel strongly about these points in relation to Jangbi. I think he's kinda arrogant and that's where you can really get him (especially during or after counter-aggression). I do like him as a player though so XD.

Aside from all that...

DA YUN YEOUL SUN TZUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

On March 05 2009 18:34 isbunk wrote:
i mean, this is the mms-stream

+ Show Spoiler +

is there a way to play that in vlc, because when i do, i get an error

On March 05 2009 18:33 FakeSteve[TPR] wrote:


hello, old friend. nice to see you're still around here cheering for nada

On March 05 2009 18:35 toshi wrote:

thnx man it's work for me