EPT[CSL+] Duke versus Georgia Tech - Page 5
| Forum Index > Brood War Tournaments |
|
StarN
United States2587 Posts
| ||
|
Xeris
Iran17695 Posts
HAXXXXXXX | ||
|
Ideas
United States8180 Posts
| ||
|
YoUr_KiLLeR
United States3420 Posts
On November 08 2009 01:37 hazelynut wrote: - Who do you think will make the finals from the West Conference, and how do you think Georgia Tech would fare against them? ▲ I haven’t really paid much attention to other divisions but I would say UT. They were great last year and it looks like they’re just as good this year, plus AttackZerg is a great guy. WTF OZZIE | ||
|
LeoTheLion
China958 Posts
On November 09 2009 15:47 DarthThienAn wrote: There's always a possibility of cheating. There are things we can't stop, and I think this was definitely a matchup worth live streaming for the CSL fans. Our hope is that people are above cheating and respect themselves, their opponents, and the league enough to not resort to something like that.. It'd be the same as a hacker imo. Yes I know, but something like delaying the stream by 15 or 30 minutes reduces the possibility of cheating by a lot, while still allowing for a stream. Some cheating may be unintentional, i.e. the team watching in the same room as the player playing, and the sound is on. Even if the player doesn't want to cheat, he'll still hear stuff, and it's hard to ignore "OMG OMG PROXY RAX" when you hear it. | ||
|
LeoTheLion
China958 Posts
On November 09 2009 22:38 StarN wrote: I can vouch for them, none of the Duke guys cheated. (and I go to UNC :X) I didn't say Duke or GT cheated. I'm just saying that it might be a better idea to have a delayed stream, or to even cast the reps. | ||
Empyrean
17082 Posts
On November 10 2009 12:49 LeoTheLion wrote: I didn't say Duke or GT cheated. I'm just saying that it might be a better idea to have a delayed stream, or to even cast the reps. I pushed for this but Xeris kept on PMSing  | ||
|
blabber
United States4448 Posts
On November 10 2009 12:49 LeoTheLion wrote: Yes I know, but something like delaying the stream by 15 or 30 minutes reduces the possibility of cheating by a lot, while still allowing for a stream. Some cheating may be unintentional, i.e. the team watching in the same room as the player playing, and the sound is on. Even if the player doesn't want to cheat, he'll still hear stuff, and it's hard to ignore "OMG OMG PROXY RAX" when you hear it. a delay of like 2 or 3 minutes would probably be enough. The main problem here is actually figuring out how to delay the stream through livestream | ||
|
Xeris
Iran17695 Posts
On November 10 2009 12:58 Empyrean wrote: I pushed for this but Xeris kept on PMSing I pushed for people to remove the sticks from their anuses, and it worked. In the future though, we'll coordinate these big matches so that we can get a delay. Although at the time, it'd be really annoying to 100 people on my stream to watch me sit in the channel for 20 mins waiting for a game to be played, etc. | ||
|
LeoTheLion
China958 Posts
On November 10 2009 14:01 blabber wrote: a delay of like 2 or 3 minutes would probably be enough. The main problem here is actually figuring out how to delay the stream through livestream If player A takes a hidden expo, player B may never find that expo in a game. But if the commentator says "A is taking an expo at 7!!!" three minutes later B hears it and recalls to 7. Best case scenario is if games are cast after they are completed. | ||
|
LeoTheLion
China958 Posts
On November 10 2009 14:31 Xeris wrote: I pushed for people to remove the sticks from their anuses, and it worked. In the future though, we'll coordinate these big matches so that we can get a delay. Although at the time, it'd be really annoying to 100 people on my stream to watch me sit in the channel for 20 mins waiting for a game to be played, etc. They don't have to watch you for 20 min waiting in channel. Just say stream starts 30 minutes after the matches start. Until then just play a vod or something. | ||
|
Ideas
United States8180 Posts
| ||
OneOther
United States10774 Posts
On November 10 2009 14:36 LeoTheLion wrote: They don't have to watch you for 20 min waiting in channel. Just say stream starts 30 minutes after the matches start. Until then just play a vod or something. there was trust between our teams. i know how much cooler it is to watch the games live than watch delayed replays. | ||
|
Ideas
United States8180 Posts
On November 10 2009 15:04 OneOther wrote: there was trust between our teams. i know how much cooler it is to watch the games live than watch delayed replays. I kinda got the feeling you guys didn't trust us at all. What with cameron kicking our ob out of the match and then starting it immediately after and all.... | ||
|
Xeris
Iran17695 Posts
On November 10 2009 14:36 LeoTheLion wrote: They don't have to watch you for 20 min waiting in channel. Just say stream starts 30 minutes after the matches start. Until then just play a vod or something. The point is, that wasn't practical at that moment because there were already 100 people in the channel. Sure in the future it can be worked out so this is no problem, but for that time it wasn't very efficient. Plus, people likely wouldn't cheat. | ||
|
OneOther
United States10774 Posts
On November 10 2009 15:09 Ideas wrote: I kinda got the feeling you guys didn't trust us at all. What with cameron kicking our ob out of the match and then starting it immediately after and all.... there was no reason to create more potential problems when you could have watched the stream, just like we were | ||
|
Ideas
United States8180 Posts
On November 10 2009 15:13 OneOther wrote: there was no reason to create more potential problems when you could have watched the stream, just like we were that's your opinion but it doesn't give you the right to kick our ob out without discussion | ||
|
Ideas
United States8180 Posts
| ||
SilverskY
Korea (South)3086 Posts
| ||
|
OneOther
United States10774 Posts
On November 10 2009 15:15 Ideas wrote: that's your opinion but it doesn't give you the right to kick our ob out without discussion are you actually still bitching about that? the player didn't want obs and he asked about five times to leave politely (actually kicked him once). he came back and wouldn't even respond to the player. if there's a stream, which already creates possibilities of cheating, we are not going to an obs in when the player doesn't want it. and how does first game being lagless mean the second game will be the same? it's two different players lol. and there was no obs in the first game either besides duran. | ||
| ||
